James Sanders
We are investigating James Sanders for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : James Sanders
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 09 Apr 2021
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 45768/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 21 Nov 2024
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
We are investigating James Sanders for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
We are investigating James Sanders for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
What are they trying to censor
James Sanders has been implicated in several controversies that have significantly tarnished his reputation. These incidents span from legal convictions to professional misconduct, each contributing to a complex and contentious public image.
Conviction Related to TWA Flight 800 Investigation
In the late 1990s, James Sanders, an investigative journalist, delved into the mysterious crash of TWA Flight 800. He obtained seat fabric from the wreckage to test a reddish-orange residue, suspecting it to be missile fuel. His findings were published in his 1997 book, “The Downing of TWA Flight 800,” where he posited that the U.S. military had inadvertently downed the aircraft with a missile. This led to his conviction for conspiring to remove material from the crash site, as the court determined that the First Amendment did not protect his actions in this context.
Allegations of Improper Use of Copyright Takedown Notices
More recently, Sanders has been accused of attempting to suppress unfavorable online content by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This alleged strategy involved impersonation, fraud, and perjury to remove critical reviews and adverse news from search engine results. Such actions, if proven, not only undermine the principles of free speech but also constitute serious legal violations.
Professional Misconduct Leading to Termination
In a separate incident, a police officer named James Sanders was terminated after a traffic stop involving a teenager escalated due to his unprofessional conduct. During the stop, Sanders used profane language and threatened the teenager, actions that were captured on body camera footage. This behavior was deemed a violation of departmental policies and led to his dismissal.
Reputational Impact and Potential Motivations for Content Removal
The cumulative effect of these incidents has severely damaged Sanders’s public standing. The conviction related to the TWA Flight 800 investigation casts doubts on his journalistic ethics and respect for legal boundaries. The allegations of misusing copyright takedown notices suggest a willingness to engage in deceitful practices to manipulate public perception. The professional misconduct incident further portrays a pattern of behavior inconsistent with societal and professional norms.
Given the detrimental impact of these stories, Sanders would have a strong incentive to remove them from public discourse. The negative portrayal could hinder future professional opportunities, erode public trust, and perpetuate a tarnished legacy. This motivation might drive an individual to consider extreme measures, including illicit activities, to suppress such information. However, engaging in cyber crimes to achieve this not only exacerbates legal troubles but also reinforces the negative perceptions he seeks to escape.
In conclusion, the controversies surrounding James Sanders encompass legal convictions, allegations of unethical behavior, and professional misconduct. Each incident contributes to a narrative that significantly harms his reputation, providing a possible motive for attempting to remove such information from public view, even at the risk of engaging in further illicit activities.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/23458334
- Apr 09, 2021
- daniel finley
- https://danielfinley.livejournal.com/571.html
- https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/james-sanders-trader-who-thought-he-was-untouchable-7870125.html
Evidence Box
We are investigating James Sanders for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.
Targeted Content and Red Flags
deltaplexnews.com
White Hall man arrested on allegations of multiple charges involving fraud
- Red Flag
dailymail.co.uk
City trader who spent £1million renovating his £5million townhouse with profits from an insider dealing scam ordered to pay back over £1million to avoid staying in prison
- Red Flag
About the Author
The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent Checks
Cyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent Investigation
Our Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit Forum
Threads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
2
Based on 4 ratings
Mira Garrison
Share
Well, I guess the next time anyone does something like this, they should make sure their criminal activities aren’t more obvious than the stuff they’re trying to hide, right? Like, really? A fake takedown to stop bad reviews??
Riley Carter
Share
The way Sanders flaunted his illegal activities is disgusting. His overconfidence blinded him to the reality of his criminal behavior.
Quincy Stone
Share
His whole life was built on lies and insider trading. Sanders thought his wealth made him untouchable, but now he’s paying the price for his crimes.
Kyle Brooks
Share
James Sanders thought he was above the law, and his arrogance led him straight into a fraud conviction. It’s clear that greed and disregard for ethics always have consequences.