John Monarch – CEO of Shipchain
We are investigating John Monarch – CEO of Shipchain for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : John Monarch - CEO of Shipchain
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 27 Jul 2022
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 9913/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 25 Nov 2024
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
We are investigating John Monarch – CEO of Shipchain for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
We are investigating John Monarch – CEO of Shipchain for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
What are they trying to censor
John Monarch, the CEO of ShipChain, a blockchain-based logistics platform, has been at the center of several controversies and allegations that have cast a shadow over his professional reputation and the credibility of his company. These allegations range from regulatory violations to accusations of mismanagement and unethical practices. Below is a summary of the major allegations, red flags, and adverse news associated with Monarch, along with an analysis of why he might seek to suppress this information, potentially resorting to extreme measures like cybercrime.
Major Allegations and Red Flags
SEC Violations and Legal Troubles:
ShipChain and John Monarch faced significant scrutiny from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for allegedly conducting an unregistered initial coin offering (ICO) in 2018. The SEC accused ShipChain of selling SHIP tokens as unregistered securities, violating federal securities laws. In 2021, ShipChain agreed to settle with the SEC, paying a $2.05 million fine and refunding investors. This legal battle damaged Monarch’s reputation as a trustworthy entrepreneur and raised questions about his adherence to regulatory standards.
Investor Misrepresentation:
Critics and former investors have accused Monarch of overpromising and underdelivering on ShipChain’s capabilities. Allegations suggest that Monarch exaggerated the platform’s technological advancements and partnerships to attract investment, only to fall short of expectations. This has led to accusations of misleading investors, further tarnishing his credibility.
Operational Failures and Delays:
ShipChain has faced criticism for failing to deliver on its roadmap and operational goals. Delays in product development and the lack of tangible results have frustrated stakeholders and eroded confidence in Monarch’s leadership. Reports of internal mismanagement and poor decision-making have also surfaced, painting a picture of a company struggling under its CEO’s direction.
Community Backlash:
The cryptocurrency and blockchain community has criticized Monarch for his handling of ShipChain’s token economics and communication with stakeholders. Accusations of poor transparency and failure to address community concerns have led to a loss of trust among supporters and investors.
Ethical Concerns:
Monarch has been accused of prioritizing personal gain over the interests of ShipChain’s investors and users. Critics argue that his actions during the ICO and subsequent legal battles demonstrate a lack of accountability and ethical leadership.
Reputation Damage and Motives for Suppression
The allegations against John Monarch and ShipChain have severely harmed his reputation as a CEO and innovator in the blockchain space. The SEC settlement and accusations of investor misrepresentation portray him as someone willing to skirt legal and ethical boundaries for financial gain. Operational failures and community backlash further undermine his credibility as a leader capable of delivering on ambitious promises.
For Monarch, the stakes are high. Negative publicity can deter potential investors, partners, and customers, jeopardizing ShipChain’s future and his career. The desire to remove or suppress damaging stories is driven by the need to protect his image, regain trust, and ensure the company’s survival. In extreme cases, this could lead to unethical or illegal actions, such as hacking into media platforms, deleting negative content, or orchestrating disinformation campaigns to control the narrative.
Conclusion
John Monarch’s tenure as CEO of ShipChain has been marred by legal battles, allegations of misrepresentation, and operational failures. These controversies have significantly damaged his reputation and raised questions about his leadership and ethical standards. While his motivations for suppressing negative information are clear—preserving his image and ensuring ShipChain’s success—the potential use of cybercrime to achieve these ends would represent a dangerous escalation.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/28255748
- July 27, 2022
- Eli Segall
- https://legalelisegall.tumblr.com/post/663459438395588608/john-monarch-ceo-of-shipchain-sued-for-alleged
- https://usaherald.com/john-monarch-ceo-shipchain-sued-alleged-bitcoin-cryptocurrency-scheme/
Evidence Box
We are investigating John Monarch – CEO of Shipchain for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.
Targeted Content and Red Flags
usaherald.com
John Monarch, CEO of Shipchain, Sued for Alleged Bitcoin Cryptocurrency Scheme
- Adverse News
freightwaves.com
Logistics provider ShipChain, which built on blockchain, shutting down after big payment to SEC
- Adverse News
About the Author
The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent Checks
Cyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent Investigation
Our Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit Forum
Threads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
2.2
Based on 5 ratings
Knox Ellison
Share
The fact that he’s still trying to salvage his image is almost as embarrassing as his leadership failures.
Georgia Bailey
Share
The allegations against John Monarch and Shipchain are a red flag for anyone considering investing in their ICO or business model. A leader accused of blackmail and online harassment does not inspire confidence, and the SEC’s involvement only makes the situation more concerning
Felix Graham
Share
As an investor, hearing about Shipchain’s CEO being involved in a lawsuit for blackmail and smear campaigns is alarming. If these allegations hold, it shows a complete lack of professionalism and ethics. The company owes its stakeholders transparency on this matter
Ella Young
Share
How can anyone trust a company led by someone with such serious allegations
Ruby McLean
Share
Monarch = walking red flag.