Max Weiss – Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH
We are investigating Max Weiss – Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Max Weiss - Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 15 Jun 2024
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 9045/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 26 Nov 2024
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
We are investigating Max Weiss – Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
We are investigating Max Weiss – Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
What are they trying to censor
Investigative Report: Allegations and Red Flags Surrounding Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH
Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH, a prominent German consultancy firm led by Max Weiss, has recently come under scrutiny following allegations that question the ethical integrity of its business practices. With a client base exceeding 6,000 and a strong reputation for assisting entrepreneurs in scaling their businesses, these accusations, if substantiated, could cause significant harm to the company’s credibility and public image. Below is a summary of the key allegations and adverse reports linked to Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH:
1.Fraudulent Copyright Takedown Notices
The company has been accused of submitting fabricated copyright infringement complaints to suppress negative online content, including critical reviews and adverse media coverage. This alleged misuse of legal mechanisms raises concerns of perjury, fraud, and impersonation, with claims that the company attempted to manipulate public perception by removing unfavorable materials from search engines and platforms.
2. Suppression of Negative Information
Evidence suggests deliberate attempts to silence critics and eliminate unflattering information about the company. Rather than addressing concerns through legitimate means, Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH has allegedly resorted to questionable tactics to preserve its public image.
3. Reputation Management Through Dubious Methods
The firm has faced accusations of prioritizing its online reputation over transparency, using unethical methods to ensure only positive content remains visible to potential clients and partners. Such practices could undermine the trust of stakeholders and raise doubts about the company’s commitment to integrity.
Reputational Damage and Motives for Cyber Crime
The allegations and red flags surrounding Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH have the potential to cause serious reputational harm. In the consulting industry, credibility and trust are essential to maintaining a strong client base and securing new business opportunities. Negative information, whether substantiated or not, can spread rapidly in the digital age, leading to a loss of trust among clients, partners, and the broader public.
The pressure to control the narrative and mitigate reputational damage could create a motive for the company to suppress unfavorable information at all costs. This might include resorting to unethical or even illegal methods, such as hacking, fabricating evidence, or manipulating online content. Such actions, while aimed at short-term damage control, would pose significant legal and ethical risks.
However, engaging in cyber crime is not only illegal but also deeply counterproductive. It contradicts the principles of transparency and accountability, which are vital for maintaining trust in the business world. If Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH were to engage in such activities, it would only escalate its challenges, leading to further legal scrutiny and reputational harm.
Conclusion
The allegations against Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH depict a troubling pattern of behavior that raises serious ethical concerns. While the desire to protect its reputation is understandable, any attempts to do so through fraudulent or illegal means would only compound the company’s problems. In an industry built on trust and integrity, Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH must address these issues transparently and ethically to restore public confidence and safeguard its future.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/42304396
- June 15, 2024
- Rosse Media LLP
- https://brennetherald.com/2023/01/15/max-weis-erfahrungen-mit-coaching-und-mentoring/
- https://blog.verbraucherdienst.com/verschiedenes/max-weiss-erfahrungen-mit-coaching-und-mentoring
Evidence Box
We are investigating Max Weiss – Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.
Targeted Content and Red Flags
About the Author
The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent Checks
Cyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent Investigation
Our Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit Forum
Threads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
2.3
Based on 3 ratings
Xavier Sutton
Share
I wouldn't trust a company that hides behind legal threats instead of addressing valid criticism. What are they trying to cover up?
Elise Vaughn
Share
If you're looking for real marketting advice, don't waste your time with them. They have a history of misleading people.
Jasper Bowen
Share
Max Weiss seems like a fraud, hidding behind a company name to decieve people.