Michael Thomas Moradian
We are investigating Michael Thomas Moradian for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Michael Thomas Moradian
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 13 Jul 2024
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 9047/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 26 Nov 2024
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Michael Thomas Moradian over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Michael Thomas Moradian - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Michael Thomas Moradian, a figure now under scrutiny, faces a series of serious allegations and red flags that have significantly tarnished his reputation. These include accusations of financial fraud, improper use of copyright takedown notices, and potential cybercrime activities aimed at suppressing adverse news. Each of these allegations carries significant weight, raising questions about Moradian’s ethical and legal conduct.
Major Allegations and Red Flags
1. Financial Fraud:
Moradian has been charged with fraud in Puerto Rico for allegedly purchasing a vehicle using a bad check. The seller discovered the fraud when the bank flagged the insufficient funds, leading to legal action against Moradian. This case highlights a pattern of financial misconduct and exploitation of trust, which could severely damage his credibility in business dealings .
2. Improper Copyright Takedown Notices:
Moradian is under investigation for allegedly submitting fraudulent copyright takedown notices to Google to remove critical reviews and adverse news about him. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury. Such actions suggest a deliberate attempt to manipulate online information and suppress negative publicity, which could harm his public image and legal standing .
3. Cybercrime and Reputation Management:
The allegations of improper takedown notices point to a broader strategy of cyber-enabled reputation management. By attempting to erase damaging content, Moradian may be engaging in activities that border on cybercrime. This includes potential violations of digital privacy laws and ethical standards, further compounding his legal and reputational risks .
Reputational Damage and Motives for Suppression
The allegations against Moradian paint a picture of a individual willing to engage in unethical and potentially illegal activities to protect his reputation. Financial fraud undermines trust in his business dealings, while the misuse of copyright takedown notices suggests a calculated effort to control public perception. These actions not only harm his credibility but also raise questions about his integrity and respect for legal boundaries.
Moradian’s desire to remove adverse news is understandable from a reputational standpoint. Negative publicity can have far-reaching consequences, affecting personal relationships, business opportunities, and legal outcomes. However, resorting to cybercrime to achieve this goal is a dangerous escalation. It reflects a willingness to prioritize self-interest over ethical and legal norms, further damaging his reputation in the eyes of the public and legal authorities.
Conclusion
The allegations against Michael Thomas Moradian—ranging from financial fraud to cyber-enabled reputation manipulation—highlight a pattern of behavior that prioritizes self-preservation over ethical conduct. These actions not only harm his reputation but also expose him to significant legal risks. In an era where digital footprints are permanent, attempts to suppress adverse news through illicit means are likely to backfire, further entrenching the very damage he seeks to avoid.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43018946
- July 13, 2024
- hansen llc
- https://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/carlos-ortiz-and-tara-rosado-murdered-in-florida-keys-most-brutal-homicide-in-25-years-9234920
- https://www.primerahora.com/noticias/policia-tribunales/notas/acusan-hombre-por-comprar-vehiculo-con-cheque-sin-fondos
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
law.justia.com
Phi Theta Kappa Honor Society v. HonorSociety.Org., Inc. et al, No. 3:2022cv00208 - Document 48 (S.D. Miss. 2023)
- Red Flag
honorsociety.org
Phi Theta Kappa Lawsuit: Uncovering Alleged Deceptive Practices and Monopolization
- Red Flag
About the Author
The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent Checks
Cyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent Investigation
Our Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit Forum
Threads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
2
Based on 5 ratings
Sophia Dalton
Share
Trying to scrub your past off the internet? Ain’t gonna happen, buddy
Leo Garrison
Share
Hiding reviews doesn’t make you look innocent, it just makes you look guilty. And the fact that it’s all over the web? Oops!
Tessa Winters
Share
What’s next? Trying to erase all his social media posts? Maybe he should just delete himself from Google altogether.
Chloe Rivera
Share
Let’s get this straight: Michael Moradian wrote a bad check for a car, skipped court, and still thought he’d get away with it? That’s not just criminal. woww.
Benjamin Bell
Share
Classic scam artist move.