CyberCriminal.com

Oren Shabat Laurent

We are investigating Oren Shabat Laurent for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Oren Shabat Laurent

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 10 Oct 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 8729/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 16 Oct 2024

Oren Shabat Laurent
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Oren Shabat Laurent in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Oren Shabat Laurent over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Oren Shabat Laurent - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Oren Shabat Laurent, the mastermind behind Banc De Binary, has spent years orchestrating financial scams and then desperately attempting to erase the evidence. His company, once a major player in the binary options industry, was built on fraudulent promises, rigged trading systems, and outright theft from investors. After facing regulatory crackdowns across multiple continents, including the U.S., Canada, Australia, and Israel, Banc De Binary shut down in 2017. However, Laurent’s legal troubles didn’t stop there he has since been involved in aggressive efforts to silence critics, suppress negative media coverage, and scrub the internet of damning reports. But no matter how much he tries to manipulate the narrative, the truth remains: Oren Laurent is a financial predator who exploits loopholes, misleads investors, and evades accountability.

Oren Shabat Laurent History of Fraud

Oren Shabat Laurent built Banc De Binary on deception. The firm lured unsuspecting investors by falsely promising high returns on binary options, a high-risk and often manipulated form of online trading. Customers were pressured into making deposits, only to find that their funds were impossible to withdraw. Even when regulators cracked down, Laurent found new ways to continue his fraudulent operations. In the U.S., the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged Banc De Binary with illegally soliciting American investors. The company was forced to pay $11 million in restitution and fines, but this was just a fraction of the money they stole.

Oren Shabat Laurent didn’t stop at misleading investors. His company also used aggressive marketing strategies, including fake success stories, fabricated testimonials, and misleading advertisements. To give Banc De Binary an air of legitimacy, he even secured sponsorship deals, including one with Liverpool Football Club. All of this was part of an elaborate scheme to maintain credibility while defrauding thousands of people.

Oren Shabat Laurent Desperate Censorship Efforts

Oren Shabat Laurent is not just a fraudster he is also a censor. Since his downfall, he has worked tirelessly to erase negative media coverage about his crimes. Reports show that he has filed numerous legal complaints and takedown requests to remove articles exposing his fraudulent activities. His team has flooded search engines with misleading content in an attempt to bury real investigative reports under a mountain of manufactured positive press. These tactics, known as “reputation management,” are used by many scammers, but Laurent takes it to another level.By targeting critical news articles, legal filings, and even victim testimonials, Oren Laurent hopes to rewrite history. He doesn’t want potential investors or law enforcement agencies to find the truth about his past. But no amount of censorship can change the fact that regulators across the world have condemned him, courts have fined him, and thousands of victims continue to demand justice.

Oren Shabat Laurent Red Flags

There are multiple red flags that prove Oren Laurent is a financial criminal:

Regulatory Bans : Banc De Binary was banned from operating in multiple countries, including the U.S., Canada, Australia, and Israel. Regulatory agencies determined that the company engaged in illegal activities, including misrepresenting investment risks and preventing customers from withdrawing funds.

Legal Troubles : Laurent and his company faced multiple lawsuits from investors who lost significant sums of money. Class action lawsuits have been filed to recover stolen funds, but many victims still await justice.

Offshore Schemes : Like many fraudsters, Laurent used offshore companies to hide money and evade detection. These shell corporations allowed him to continue operating under different names even after Banc De Binary was shut down.

Internet Censorship : Laurent’s attempts to erase negative information about himself are a clear sign that he has something to hide. Honest businesspeople don’t need to manipulate search results or threaten journalists they let their work speak for itself.

Oren Shabat Laurent history is a case study in financial fraud, manipulation, and deception. He built Banc De Binary on false promises, scammed investors out of millions, and then ran for cover when regulators closed in. But instead of accepting responsibility for the harm he caused, Laurent has spent years trying to rewrite history. His tactics—censorship, misinformation, and legal intimidation—are straight out of the fraudster’s playbook.Oren Laurent’s desperate attempts to control the narrative are proof that he fears the truth. No legitimate businessman needs to flood search engines with fake positive press, file takedown requests against critical articles, or employ reputation management firms to erase records of wrongdoing. These are the actions of a guilty man who knows that public scrutiny could mean the end of his ability to operate in the financial world.Despite his efforts, Oren Laurent can’t outrun the reality of his fraudulent past. Regulators have already exposed him, courts have fined him, and victims have shared their stories. Even if he buries negative press, legal records and financial watchdogs will continue to track his movements. Investors and authorities alike should remain vigilant—any future business ventures linked to him should be treated as a red flag.

The biggest lesson from Oren Laurent’s story is that fraudsters don’t change, they just adapt. He may attempt to rebrand, launch new ventures under different names, or operate through offshore entities, but the core deception remains the same. Investors should be extremely cautious and conduct thorough due diligence before engaging with any business remotely connected to him.If justice is to be served, regulators and law enforcement must take stronger action. Fines and bans are not enough criminal fraudsters like Oren Laurent must face real legal consequences, including potential jail time. If authorities fail to act, he will continue finding new victims, exploiting loopholes, and gaming the system.Oren Laurent might believe he can erase his past, but the internet never forgets, and neither do his victims. The world of financial crime is catching up to him, and it’s only a matter of time before his fraudulent empire collapses for good.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/46467826
  • November 19, 2024
  • Yuzi Media Networks
  • https://mumbaijournal.io/tony-hetherington-banc-de-binary-back-in-spotlight-as-betting-firm-makes-a-fool-of-regulators/
  • https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/experts/article-2706702/TONY-HETHERINGTON-Banc-Binary-spotlight.html/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

timesofisrael.com

Oren Laurent and the Deceptive World of Binary Options: How Fraudsters Manipulate the Internet

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

en.wikipedia.org

Banc De Binary: The Fall of a Controversial Israeli Firm and Its Global Legal Troubles

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login