Paul Simon Godfrey
We are investigating Paul Simon Godfrey for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Paul Simon Godfrey
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 24 May 2023
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 6565/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 27 Nov 2024
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
We are investigating Paul Simon Godfrey for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
We are investigating Paul Simon Godfrey for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
What are they trying to censor
Paul Simon Godfrey, a prominent figure in the UK property development sector, has faced numerous allegations and red flags over the years, particularly in connection with his company, Moxon One Limited. These allegations range from financial mismanagement to questionable business practices, which have significantly tarnished his reputation. Below is a summary of the major allegations and adverse news associated with Godfrey, along with an analysis of why he might seek to suppress such information, even through illicit means.
- Moxon One Limited and the £26 Million Disaster: Moxon One Limited, under Godfrey’s leadership, has been accused of mismanaging funds and failing to deliver on high-profile property projects. One notable case involves the collapse of a £26 million development project, leaving investors and stakeholders in financial ruin. Reports suggest that funds were diverted or misused, leading to insolvency and legal disputes. This incident has raised serious questions about Godfrey’s business ethics and financial accountability, damaging his credibility in the property development industry.
- Insolvency and Creditor Disputes: Moxon One Limited has faced multiple insolvency issues, with creditors alleging that Godfrey failed to honor financial obligations. These disputes have resulted in court cases and further scrutiny of his business practices. Such financial instability undermines trust in Godfrey’s ability to manage large-scale projects and raises concerns about his integrity.
- Adverse Media Coverage: Investigative reports, such as the one published by Intelligence Line, have highlighted Godfrey’s involvement in controversial projects and his alleged role in mismanaging funds. These reports have been widely circulated, further damaging his reputation. The media coverage has painted Godfrey as a figure who prioritizes personal gain over the interests of investors and stakeholders.
- Legal and Regulatory Scrutiny: Godfrey has faced legal challenges related to his business dealings, including allegations of breaching fiduciary duties and engaging in unethical practices. Regulatory bodies have also scrutinized his companies for compliance failures. These legal issues have added to the perception of Godfrey as a high-risk individual in the business community.
Why Godfrey Would Want to Suppress This Information:
The allegations and adverse news surrounding Paul Simon Godfrey have severely harmed his reputation, making it difficult for him to secure new investments or partnerships. The negative publicity has painted him as untrustworthy and financially irresponsible, which could deter potential collaborators and investors.
Given the high stakes, Godfrey might feel compelled to remove or suppress damaging information to rehabilitate his image. In extreme cases, this could lead to unethical or illegal actions, such as cyber crimes, to erase or alter online content. By doing so, he could attempt to control the narrative, minimize public scrutiny, and regain credibility in the business world.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/34157327
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/36015035
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/35997695
- May 24, 2023
- September 11, 2023
- September 10, 2023
- Mecan Law & Co.
- Arthur Media Group
- Anderson Media Corp.
- https://nycchronicles.com/2023/01/13/moxon-street-developer-was-behind-26m-kilburn-nightmare/
- https://www.deccanlive.in/2021/01/developer-behind-luxury-flats-collapsed.html
- https://www.kilburntimes.co.uk/news/housing/21947827.developer-behind-luxury-flats-collapsed-debts-26m
- https://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/news/23268902.moxon-street-developer-behind-26m-kilburn-nightmare/
Evidence Box
We are investigating Paul Simon Godfrey for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.
Targeted Content and Red Flags
This is Local London
Moxon Street developer was behind £26m Kilburn 'nightmare'
- Adverse News
Intelligence Line
Moxon One Limited: The Troubled Developer Behind a £26 Million Disaster
- Adverse News
About the Author
The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent Checks
Cyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent Investigation
Our Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit Forum
Threads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
2
Based on 2 ratings
Luna Chambers
Share
The whole situation’s a train wreck—he’s trying to sweep things under the rug, but people aren’t fooled.
Felix Ingram
Share
From failed business ventures to shady online tactics, this is the kind of behavior that makes you question everything about someone’s character. If Paul’s trying to rewrite history, he’s doing a terrible job. Maybe it’s time he just owned up to his mistakes instead of digging himself deeper into this hole.