CyberCriminal.com

Paul Simon Godfrey

We are investigating Paul Simon Godfrey for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Paul Simon Godfrey

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 24 May 2023

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 6565/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 27 Nov 2024

Paul Simon Godfrey
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Paul Simon Godfrey in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Paul Simon Godfrey over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Paul Simon Godfrey - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Paul Simon Godfrey, a prominent figure in the UK property development sector, has faced numerous allegations and red flags over the years, particularly in connection with his company, Moxon One Limited. These allegations range from financial mismanagement to questionable business practices, which have significantly tarnished his reputation. Below is a summary of the major allegations and adverse news associated with Godfrey, along with an analysis of why he might seek to suppress such information, even through illicit means.

  1. Moxon One Limited and the £26 Million Disaster: Moxon One Limited, under Godfrey’s leadership, has been accused of mismanaging funds and failing to deliver on high-profile property projects. One notable case involves the collapse of a £26 million development project, leaving investors and stakeholders in financial ruin. Reports suggest that funds were diverted or misused, leading to insolvency and legal disputes. This incident has raised serious questions about Godfrey’s business ethics and financial accountability, damaging his credibility in the property development industry.
  2. Insolvency and Creditor Disputes: Moxon One Limited has faced multiple insolvency issues, with creditors alleging that Godfrey failed to honor financial obligations. These disputes have resulted in court cases and further scrutiny of his business practices. Such financial instability undermines trust in Godfrey’s ability to manage large-scale projects and raises concerns about his integrity.
  3. Adverse Media Coverage: Investigative reports, such as the one published by Intelligence Line, have highlighted Godfrey’s involvement in controversial projects and his alleged role in mismanaging funds. These reports have been widely circulated, further damaging his reputation. The media coverage has painted Godfrey as a figure who prioritizes personal gain over the interests of investors and stakeholders.
  4. Legal and Regulatory Scrutiny: Godfrey has faced legal challenges related to his business dealings, including allegations of breaching fiduciary duties and engaging in unethical practices. Regulatory bodies have also scrutinized his companies for compliance failures. These legal issues have added to the perception of Godfrey as a high-risk individual in the business community.

Why Godfrey Would Want to Suppress This Information:

The allegations and adverse news surrounding Paul Simon Godfrey have severely harmed his reputation, making it difficult for him to secure new investments or partnerships. The negative publicity has painted him as untrustworthy and financially irresponsible, which could deter potential collaborators and investors.

Given the high stakes, Godfrey might feel compelled to remove or suppress damaging information to rehabilitate his image. In extreme cases, this could lead to unethical or illegal actions, such as cyber crimes, to erase or alter online content. By doing so, he could attempt to control the narrative, minimize public scrutiny, and regain credibility in the business world.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/34157327
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/36015035
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/35997695
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/35328137
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44939102
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/34015809
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/34590291
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/33903525
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/33976942
  • May 24, 2023
  • September 11, 2023
  • September 10, 2023
  • August 04, 2023
  • September 26, 2024
  • May 17, 2023
  • June 22, 2023
  • May 09, 2023
  • May 14, 2023
  • Mecan Law & Co.
  • Arthur Media Group
  • Anderson Media Corp
  • Wing Media Group
  • Frisky Media Corp
  • Aqsa Bhatt
  • David Kos
  • Wiley Sherman
  • Wiley Sherman
  • https://nycchronicles.com/2023/01/13/moxon-street-developer-was-behind-26m-kilburn-nightmare/
  • https://www.deccanlive.in/2021/01/developer-behind-luxury-flats-collapsed.html
  • https://www.deccanlive.in/2023/08/202301moxon-street-developer-was-behind-26m-latest.html
  • https://langstonconnectnews.com/moxon-street-developer-was-behind-26m-kilburn-nightmare/
  • https://www.tumblr.com/aqsabhattblog/717548200310046720/moxon-street-developer-was-behind-26m-kilburn
  • https://www.tumblr.com/thetimesexpress/720809921652883456/moxon-street-developer-was-behind-26m-kilburn
  • https://www.tumblr.com/blogsnews/716912957175611392/moxon-street-developer-was-behind-26m-kilburn
  • https://www.kilburntimes.co.uk/news/housing/21947827.developer-behind-luxury-flats-collapsed-debts-26m
  • https://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/news/23268902.moxon-street-developer-behind-26m-kilburn-nightmare/
  • http://www.times-series.co.uk/news/23268902.moxon-street-developer-behind-26m-kilburn-nightmare

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

Kilburn Times

Developer behind luxury flats collapsed with debts of £26m

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

This is Local London

Moxon Street developer was behind £26m Kilburn 'nightmare'

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

Intelligence Line

Moxon One Limited: The Troubled Developer Behind a £26 Million Disaster

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login