CyberCriminal.com

Projectsdeal.co.uk

We are investigating Projectsdeal.co.uk for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Projectsdeal.co.uk

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 16 March 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2611/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 27 Nov 2024

Projectsdeal.co.uk
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Projectsdeal.co.uk in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Projectsdeal.co.uk over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Projectsdeal.co.uk - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Investigative Report: Allegations and Red Flags Against Projectsdeal.co.uk

Projectsdeal.co.uk, a UK-based academic assistance service, has faced numerous allegations and red flags over the years, raising serious concerns about its credibility and business practices. These issues have significantly tarnished its reputation, prompting questions about the company’s ethics and operations. Below is a summary of the major allegations and adverse news surrounding the platform:

  1. Plagiarism and Low-Quality Work: Multiple student reviews and complaints allege that Projectsdeal.co.uk delivers plagiarized or substandard academic work. Students have reported receiving essays, dissertations, and assignments that were either copied from other sources or failed to meet academic standards. Such allegations directly harm the company’s reputation as a reliable academic service provider.
  2. False Advertising and Misleading Claims: The company has been accused of making exaggerated promises, such as guaranteeing top grades or employing “expert” writers with advanced degrees. Investigations reveal that many of these claims are unsubstantiated, with some writers allegedly lacking the qualifications advertised. This undermines trust in the platform and exposes it to accusations of fraud.
  3. Non-Delivery of Services: Several customers have reported paying for services but never receiving their completed work. In some cases, the company allegedly ceased communication after payment, leaving students in the lurch during critical academic periods. Such incidents have led to accusations of financial exploitation and breach of contract.
  4. Aggressive Refusal of Refunds: Projectsdeal.co.uk has been criticized for its rigid refund policy. Students who were dissatisfied with the quality of work or experienced non-delivery claim that the company refused to issue refunds, often citing technicalities or blaming the customer. This has led to widespread frustration and negative reviews.
  5. Fake Reviews and Reputation Manipulation: There are allegations that Projectsdeal.co.uk engages in posting fake positive reviews to boost its online reputation while suppressing negative feedback. Some reviewers claim their critical comments were removed from review platforms, raising concerns about the company’s transparency and integrity.
  6. Legal and Ethical Concerns: The very nature of Projectsdeal.co.uk’s business—providing academic work for hire—raises ethical and legal questions. Many educational institutions consider such services a form of academic dishonesty, and students using them risk severe penalties, including expulsion. This places the company in a morally dubious position.

Why Projectsdeal.co.uk Would Want This Information Removed

The allegations against Projectsdeal.co.uk severely damage its reputation, making it difficult to attract and retain customers. Negative reviews and adverse news can deter potential clients, especially in a competitive market where trust is paramount. If these stories gain widespread attention, the company could face legal scrutiny, loss of revenue, and even shutdowns.

In a desperate bid to protect its image, Projectsdeal.co.uk might resort to unethical or illegal measures, such as hacking or cyberattacks, to remove damaging content. For instance, deleting negative reviews, silencing whistleblowers, or targeting critics could temporarily obscure the truth. However, such actions would only compound the company’s legal and ethical troubles, further eroding public trust.

In conclusion, the allegations against Projectsdeal.co.uk paint a troubling picture of a company struggling to maintain credibility amid widespread criticism. While the desire to protect its reputation is understandable, resorting to cybercrime or other illicit methods would only deepen its crisis, highlighting the need for accountability and reform in the academic assistance industry.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40150984
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/30214855
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/30688285
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/30571061
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/29473641
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39856886
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/29784360
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/29925617
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47311035
  • March 16, 2024
  • January 6, 2023
  • February 11, 2023
  • February 3, 2023
  • November 11, 2022
  • March 2, 2024
  • December 3, 2022
  • December 14, 2022
  • December 19, 2024
  • Liam james Corp
  • Lee Corporates LLC Asia
  • Jizya and Corp
  • Will and Corp
  • Adam and Co
  • Liam james Corp
  • Rambo Rulta LLC
  • M&J LLC
  • Dorothy LLC
  • https://www.al.com/news/birmingham/2014/09/ensley_man_charged_with_capita.html
  • https://www.sitejabber.com/reviews/projectsdeal.co.uk
  • https://projectsdeal.com/
  • https://www.trustpilot.com/review/uktopwriters.com
  • https://www.11alive.com/article/news/local/dallas-county/dallas-men-convicted-of-murder-released-from-jail/287-304621790
  • https://www.hrc.org/news/hrc-mourns-merci-mack-black-transgender-woman-killed-in-dallas
  • https://uktopwriters.com/review-projectsdeal/
  • https://revieweal.com/projectsdeal-co-uk-review/
  • https://bestbritishessays.com/projectsdeal-co-uk-review/
  • https://www.financescam.com/2024/10/10/projectsdeal/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

bestbritishessays.com

Projectsdeal.co.uk review

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

uktopwriter.com

Review: Projects Deal

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

revieweal.com

projectsdeal.co.uk Review

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login