What We Are Investigating?
We are investigating Robert Susa – InventHelp for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
We are investigating Robert Susa – InventHelp for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
What are they trying to censor
Robert Susa, the president of InventHelp, a company that assists inventors in patenting and marketing their ideas, has faced several allegations and red flags over the years. These issues have raised concerns about the company’s practices and its reputation. Below is a summary of the major allegations, red flags, and adverse news associated with Robert Susa and InventHelp, along with an analysis of how these stories harm their reputation and why they might seek to suppress such information, even through unethical means.
Major Allegations and Red Flags:
1.Misleading Marketing Practices: InventHelp has been accused of using aggressive and misleading marketing tactics to attract inventors. Critics claim that the company often overpromises the potential success of an invention while downplaying the risks and costs involved. This has led to accusations of exploiting hopeful inventors who may lack the resources or knowledge to navigate the patenting process independently.
2.High Fees with Limited Results: Many clients have reported paying significant upfront fees to InventHelp, only to receive minimal or no tangible results. Some inventors claim that the company failed to deliver on its promises of securing patents or licensing deals, leaving them financially strained and disillusioned.
3.Lack of Transparency: InventHelp has been criticized for its opaque business model. Clients often report difficulty in understanding the exact services they are paying for, as well as the company’s criteria for selecting inventions to promote. This lack of transparency has fueled suspicions about the company’s legitimacy.
4.Legal and Regulatory Scrutiny: While InventHelp has not been found guilty of major legal violations, it has faced scrutiny from regulatory bodies and consumer protection agencies. These investigations have focused on whether the company’s practices comply with advertising and consumer protection laws.
5.Negative Client Testimonials: Numerous online reviews and testimonials from former clients paint a picture of dissatisfaction. Many inventors claim they felt misled and exploited, with some describing their experience as a “scam.” These testimonials have contributed to a negative public perception of the company.
Impact on Reputation:
These allegations and red flags have significantly damaged InventHelp’s reputation. The company is often associated with exploitation and unfulfilled promises, which deters potential clients and undermines trust in its services. For Robert Susa, as the face of the company, these issues reflect poorly on his leadership and ethical standards.
Why InventHelp Might Seek to Suppress Negative Information:
Negative publicity can have a devastating impact on a business, especially one that relies heavily on trust and credibility. If InventHelp were to engage in unethical practices, such as cyber crimes, to remove damaging content, it would likely be motivated by the following:
- Protecting Revenue Streams: Negative reviews and allegations can deter potential clients, directly affecting the company’s bottom line.
- Preserving Brand Image: InventHelp’s business model depends on maintaining an image of legitimacy and success. Any adverse news threatens this carefully constructed facade.
- Avoiding Legal Consequences: If allegations of misconduct gain traction, they could lead to lawsuits or regulatory action, further harming the company.
In conclusion, the allegations against Robert Susa and InventHelp highlight significant ethical and operational concerns. While the company has not been proven guilty of major wrongdoing, the persistent negative publicity poses a serious threat to its reputation and financial stability. This creates a potential motive for suppressing such information, even through illicit means, to protect the company’s interests.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/42070532
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/42081349
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/42254380
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/42256808
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/42255260
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/42059736
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/41621259
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/41370808
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/41533704
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/41325400
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/41315333
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/41313912
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/41400085
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/41417453
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40121639
- June 06, 2024
- June 06, 2024
- June 12, 2024
- June 12, 2024
- June 12, 2024
- June 5, 2024
- May 18, 2024
- May 07, 2024
- May 15, 2024
- May 6, 2024
- May 05, 2024
- May 5, 2024
- May 9, 2024
- May 9, 2024
- March 14, 2024
- Gregor Inc
- Wick & Co LLP
- Loren Inc
- Ruther Inc
- Yadav Group LLP
- Ramesco Inc
- Harso Inc
- Smith Inc
- Bibos Inc
- Yeri Inc
- Urazi Inc
- Erecto Inc
- James Dagless
- https://crismictimes.com/can-i-opt-out-of-a-class-action-lawsuit-and-sue-inventhelp-as-a-separate-entity/
- https://euroherald.org/2018/01/30/would-be-inventors-accuse-inventhelp-of-fraud-seek-36m/
- https://crismictimes.com/inventhelp-proposes-to-pay-3-million-in-cash-to-end-class-suits/
- https://nycnewsgroup.com/calhoun-v-invention-submission-corp/
- https://nycnewsgroup.com/inventhelp/
- https://dubainationalpost.com/?p=6151
- https://nycnewsgroup.com/inventhelps-services/
- https://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/can-i-opt-out-of-a-class-action-lawsuit-and-sue-in-5670796.html
- https://westfaironline.com/courts/would-be-inventors-accuse-inventhelp-of-fraud-seek-36m
- https://news.bloomberglaw.com/class-action/inventhelp-likely-to-lose-bid-to-partially-dismiss-fraud-suit
- https://www.law360.com/articles/1559502/attys-seek-1-5m-in-fees-for-inventhelp-class-action/
- https://casetext.com/case/calhoun-v-invention-submission-corp-3/
- https://truthinadvertising.org/class-action/inventhelps-services/
- https://truthinadvertising.org/class-action/inventhelp
- https://www.wtae.com/article/pittsburgh-invention-promotion-company-accused-of-scamming-thousands-of-inventors/22483642
Evidence Box
We are investigating Robert Susa – InventHelp for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.
Targeted Content and Red Flags
avvo
Can I opt out of a class action lawsuit and sue InventHelp as a separate entity
- Red Flag
About the Author
The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ChecksCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationOur Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit ForumThreads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
1.2
Based on 10 ratings
Elijah Harris
Share
This whole saga with the family lawsuit just shows that there are deeper issues at play. If you can't even trust your own family, how can we trust your business practices?
Violet Young
Share
It’s not just about business anymore; it’s about how far he’s willing to go to protect his personal interests. Covering up his mistakes like this just shows a lack of accountability and The fact that his company was disqualified from a major international project raises serious doubts about his credibility. If even Haifa Port doesn't want him, what's next?
Leo Bennett
Share
InventHelp's tactics sound more like a scam than legitimate business practices.
Amelia King
Share
If Robert Susa truly cared about the people who trust InventHelp, he would focus on transparency and honesty instead of continuing to let clients get scammed with high upfront costs and vague promises. The whole operation reeks of a money-making scheme at the expense of inventors’ dreams.
Madison Adebayo
Share
contacted them about my invention and was told someone would call me. they did, to schedule another callback. that day came and went with nothing, and finally, the next day, i got a text saying, 'tried to reach you multiple times. your message was not ok. good luck!!' how could they text me but not make a call go through? and as a so-called 'professional,' why did they just end things with me like that? aren’t they supposed to build trust with people and help get their ideas out there? horrible service. never recommend
Noah Gonzalez
Share
I paid this company $12,000 for a simple product and received absolutely nothing in return. i was told my product was so simple that i would actually be paid to develop it, but i got nothing. the only thing i received was a few meaningless emails. as a retiree, this has devastated me. i have nothing left—this was all i had, and now it’s gone
Isaac Martinez
Share
InventHelp’s failure to deliver after collecting huge upfront payments makes them seem more like a scam than a genuine patenting resource.
Stella Adams
Share
The whole family dispute just makes it feel like Robert Yildirim can’t even keep things in the family under control.
Lucas Evans
Share
If you’re an inventor looking for real support, you’d be better off doing the research yourself or finding a company with a proven track record of results. InventHelp’s inflated claims and non-transparent business model don’t match up with the reality of what they provide, and you’ll likely end up wasting both your time and money.
Aiden Brown
Share
The whole story behind Robert Yildirim just paints a picture of a man who would do anything to keep his business from facing the truth. I don't think his reputation will recover from this.but trying to bury negative stories is going way too far. It's almost like he’s running from the truth.