Ronald Rubin – Florida Office of Financial Regulation
We are investigating Ronald Rubin – Florida Office of Financial Regulation for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Ronald Rubin - Florida Office of Financial Regulation
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 14 Apr 2022
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 0657/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 27 Nov 2024
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Ronald Rubin – Florida Office of Financial Regulation over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Ronald Rubin – Florida Office of Financial Regulation - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Ronald Rubin, the former commissioner of the Florida Office of Financial Regulation (OFR), has been embroiled in multiple controversies and allegations that have significantly tarnished his reputation. These include accusations of sexual harassment, misuse of public office, and ethical violations, which have raised serious red flags about his conduct and leadership.
Major Allegations and Adverse News:
Sexual Harassment Allegations:
In 2019, Rubin was accused of sexual harassment by a female employee at the OFR. The employee alleged that Rubin made inappropriate comments and advances, creating a hostile work environment. This led to an investigation by the Florida Senate, which found the allegations credible. Rubin was subsequently suspended and later resigned from his position.
Misuse of Public Office:
Rubin faced criticism for allegedly using his position for personal gain. Reports surfaced that he attempted to leverage his role to secure business opportunities and favors, raising questions about his ethical conduct and integrity.
Lack of Qualifications:
Rubin’s appointment as commissioner was controversial from the start, with critics arguing that he lacked the necessary experience and qualifications for the role. His tenure was marked by internal strife and poor management, further damaging his credibility.
Legal and Ethical Violations:
Rubin was accused of violating state ethics laws, including failing to disclose financial interests and conflicts of interest. These violations led to further scrutiny and damaged his reputation as a public official.
Impact on Reputation:
These allegations and adverse news stories have severely harmed Rubin’s reputation, painting him as an unethical and unfit leader. The sexual harassment scandal, in particular, has had a lasting impact, as it not only led to his resignation but also cast a shadow over his professional legacy. The misuse of public office and ethical violations further eroded public trust, making it difficult for Rubin to rehabilitate his image.
Charles Lambert’s Motives:
Charles Lambert, a close associate of Rubin, may have a vested interest in removing these damaging stories from public view. Lambert, who has been linked to Rubin in various business dealings, could be concerned that the ongoing scrutiny of Rubin’s past could implicate him or harm their shared interests. By erasing or suppressing these stories, Lambert may aim to protect his own reputation and financial interests, as well as Rubin’s.
The lengths to which Lambert might go—potentially even committing cyber crimes—highlight the desperation to control the narrative. Removing these stories would not only shield Rubin from further public backlash but also prevent any potential legal or financial repercussions that could arise from continued scrutiny. In the world of investigative journalism, this raises serious ethical and legal questions about the extent to which individuals will go to掩盖不当行为 and protect their interests.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/27262513
- Apr 14, 2022
- Mazen Wajih
- https://legalmazenwajih.tumblr.com/post/681503454485725184/ron-rubin-florida-finance-chief-created
- https://www.orlandosentinel.com/politics/os-ne-ron-rubin-emails-records-20190717-wt3esjnqenartc6trb4us7w6pe-story.html
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
orlandosentinel.com
Florida Finance Chief creates intimidating, hostile’ workplace, probe finds
- Adverse News
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and serves as a researcher at
FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent Checks
Cyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent Investigation
Our Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit Forum
Threads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
2
Based on 5 ratings
Zoe Davis
Share
Ronald Rubin’s legacy is tarnished by the sexual harassment allegations that led to his resignation. His behavior was unacceptable for someone in such a powerful position
Ethan Clark
Share
Ronald Rubin’s tenure as commissioner was marked by scandal and controversy. His sexual harassment allegations, misuse of public office, and lack of qualifications for the role exposed his unfitness to lead. He violated ethical standards and failed to manage the office properly, ultimately damaging his own reputation beyond repair. There’s no coming back from the kind of conduct he displayed
Katherine Clark
Share
Beyond the legal and procedural aspects, it’s important to think about the people affected by Rubin’s alleged behavior. Colleagues subjected to harassment, employees trapped in a toxic work environment, and citizens losing trust in their institutions—this isn’t just about Rubin; it’s about the damage left in his wake.
Jack Martin
Share
Rubin’s actions highlight the dangers of unchecked power in public office.
Benjamin Allen
Share
It’s clear Rubin was more interested in personal gain than serving the public. His career is a cautionary tale of how not to lead