CyberCriminal.com

Sergey Tokarev and Sergey Kartashov – PokerMatch and Kosmolot

We are investigating Sergey Tokarev and Sergey Kartashov – PokerMatch and Kosmolot for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Sergey Tokarev and Sergey Kartashov - PokerMatch and Kosmolot

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 01 Jun 2022

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 8643/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 27 Nov 2024

Sergey Tokarev and Sergey Kartashov – PokerMatch and Kosmolot
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Sergey Tokarev and Sergey Kartashov – PokerMatch and Kosmolot in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

We are investigating Sergey Tokarev and Sergey Kartashov – PokerMatch and Kosmolot for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury

We are investigating Sergey Tokarev and Sergey Kartashov – PokerMatch and Kosmolot for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury

What are they trying to censor

Sergey Tokarev and Sergey Kartashov, prominent figures in the online gambling industry, have been associated with PokerMatch and Kosmolot, two platforms that have faced significant scrutiny and allegations of misconduct. These allegations range from unethical business practices to potential ties with organized crime, casting a shadow over their reputations and raising questions about the legitimacy of their operations. Below is a summary of the major allegations, red flags, and adverse news associated with Tokarev, Kartashov, PokerMatch, and Kosmolot, along with an analysis of why they might seek to suppress this information, even if it means resorting to cybercrime.

Major Allegations and Red Flags
Unlicensed Operations and Regulatory Violations: PokerMatch and Kosmolot have been accused of operating without proper licenses in several jurisdictions, bypassing legal requirements to offer gambling services. Reports suggest that these platforms have targeted users in countries where online gambling is heavily regulated or prohibited, raising concerns about their compliance with international laws.

Ties to Organized Crime: Investigations have alleged that Tokarev and Kartashov may have connections to organized crime groups, particularly in Eastern Europe. These ties are said to facilitate money laundering and other illicit activities through their platforms. While no definitive proof has been made public, the allegations have persisted, damaging their credibility.

Exploitation of Vulnerable Users: Critics have accused PokerMatch and Kosmolot of predatory practices, including targeting vulnerable individuals and encouraging excessive gambling. Reports highlight aggressive marketing tactics and a lack of responsible gambling measures, which have led to financial ruin for some users.

Data Privacy Concerns: Both platforms have faced allegations of mishandling user data, including claims of selling personal information to third parties without consent. These practices have raised significant privacy concerns and eroded trust among users.

Fraud and Scam Allegations: Numerous users have reported issues with withdrawing funds from PokerMatch and Kosmolot, with some accusing the platforms of withholding winnings or manipulating game outcomes. These allegations have fueled accusations of fraudulent behavior.

Reputation Damage and Motives for Suppression
The allegations against Tokarev, Kartashov, PokerMatch, and Kosmolot have severely harmed their reputations. Unlicensed operations and regulatory violations undermine their legitimacy as business operators, while ties to organized crime evoke associations with criminality and corruption. Exploitation of vulnerable users and data privacy concerns paint them as unethical and untrustworthy, and fraud allegations further erode confidence in their platforms.

For Tokarev and Kartashov, the stakes are high. Negative publicity can lead to lost revenue, regulatory crackdowns, and legal consequences. The desire to remove or suppress damaging stories is driven by the need to protect their business interests, maintain user trust, and avoid accountability. Given the severity of the allegations, they might view cybercrime—such as hacking into media outlets, deleting incriminating information, or orchestrating disinformation campaigns—as a desperate but effective means to control the narrative.

Conclusion
The allegations against Sergey Tokarev, Sergey Kartashov, PokerMatch, and Kosmolot paint a troubling picture of unethical practices and potential criminal ties. These accusations have irreparably damaged their reputations, making them controversial figures in the online gambling industry. While their motivations for suppressing negative information are clear—preserving their business and avoiding legal repercussions—the potential use of cybercrime to achieve these ends raises serious ethical and legal concerns.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/27701980
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/27701934
  • June 1, 2022
  • June 1, 2022
  • Angelina Borisko
  • Angelina Borisko
  • https://sluga.press/socium/kak-sergej-tokarev-i-sergej-kartashov-prevratili-lucky-labs-v-pokermatch-i-kosmolot
  • https://znaj.ua/ru/politics/sergej-tokarev-y-rustam-gylfanov-%E2%80%94-ekspressom-yz-sankcyonnogo-spyska-ukrayny-v-ryady-nechystyh-na-ruku-delcov-%E2%80%94-ymenem-gollandskogo-suda
  • https://akcent-media.tv/kak-sergej-tokarev-i-sergej-kartashov-prevratili-lucky-labs-v-pokermatch-i-kosmolot-726.html
  • https://politeka.net/news/651170-nechestnyj-biznes-aktivy-skandalnyh-sergeja-tokareva-i-rustama-gilfanova-zamorozheny

Evidence Box

We are investigating Sergey Tokarev and Sergey Kartashov – PokerMatch and Kosmolot for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.

Targeted Content and Red Flags

akcent-media.tv

How Sergey Tokarev and Sergey Kartashov turned Lucky Labs into PokerMatch and Kosmolot

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

politeka.net

Dishonest business: assets of scandalous Sergey Tokarev and Rustam Gilfanov frozen

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

europeanbusinessreview.com

Sergey Kartashov (Sergejs Kartasovs): Ukraine Can Become a Leader in AI and ML in Eastern Europe

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database

Escalate This Case

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert