What We Are Investigating?
We are investigating Swiss Safeway for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
We are investigating Swiss Safeway for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
What are they trying to censor
Swiss Safeway, an offshore brokerage firm registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, has been embroiled in several controversies that cast a shadow over its operations and reputation. Despite its name suggesting a Swiss affiliation, the company lacks any physical presence or regulatory status in Switzerland, leading to allegations of misleading representation.
Regulatory Concerns and Misleading Information
Operating without valid regulatory oversight, Swiss Safeway is situated in a jurisdiction known for lenient financial regulations. This absence of stringent oversight raises significant concerns about the firm’s legitimacy and reliability. The company’s name and marketing materials imply a Swiss origin, potentially misleading clients into believing they are engaging with a reputable Swiss institution. In reality, Swiss Safeway has no ties to Switzerland, which can be seen as a deliberate attempt to enhance its credibility under false pretenses.
Unfavorable Trading Conditions
Clients have reported issues with Swiss Safeway’s trading conditions, including high spreads and unexpected fees. The firm’s terms and conditions contain clauses that can hinder clients’ ability to withdraw funds, especially those linked to bonus promotions. Such practices have led to dissatisfaction among traders, who feel disadvantaged by the company’s policies.
Allegations of Fraudulent Activities
Swiss Safeway has been accused of engaging in fraudulent activities, notably filing fake copyright takedown notices to suppress negative online content. Investigations revealed that the company attempted to remove critical information from the internet by submitting fraudulent Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) takedown notices. This involved impersonation and perjury, as the company allegedly created fake original articles to deceive platforms like Google into removing unfavorable content. Such actions suggest attempts to manipulate public perception and hide unfavorable information.
Reputation Management Through Deceptive Means
The fraudulent DMCA takedown attempts indicate a deliberate strategy by Swiss Safeway to censor critical reviews and adverse news. By impersonating individuals and committing perjury, the company sought to manipulate search engine results and public perception. This not only undermines the integrity of online information but also raises ethical and legal concerns about the lengths to which Swiss Safeway is willing to go to protect its reputation.
Impact on Reputation and Potential Motivations for Extreme Measures
The accumulation of these allegations and adverse news significantly harms Swiss Safeway’s reputation. The portrayal of the company as engaging in deceptive practices, coupled with regulatory concerns and unfavorable trading conditions, can deter potential clients and erode trust among existing ones. In an industry where credibility is paramount, such negative publicity can have severe financial and operational repercussions.
Given the damaging nature of this information, Swiss Safeway would have a strong motivation to have it removed from public domains. The desire to maintain a facade of legitimacy and trustworthiness might drive the company to consider extreme measures, including unethical or illegal actions, to suppress negative content. The fraudulent DMCA takedown attempts exemplify such measures, indicating a willingness to commit cyber crimes to achieve the goal of reputation management.
In conclusion, the controversies surrounding Swiss Safeway highlight significant ethical and legal breaches. The company’s attempts to manipulate public perception through fraudulent means not only damage its reputation but also raise broader concerns about accountability and integrity within the financial services industry.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/25785881
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/25942742
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/26024882
- November 24, 2021
- November 21, 2021
- November 24, 2021
- Kenneth Porter
- Walter Elliott
- Kenneth Porter
- https://kenneth-porter.blogspot.com/2021/11/swisssafeway.html
- https://walterelliott.blogspot.com/2021/11/swisssafewaycom-reviews-scam-or-legit.html?m=1
- https://kenneth-porter.blogspot.com/2021/11/swiss-safeway-review-is-swisssafewaycom.html
- https://www.wikifx.com/in_en/dealer/3200874176.html
- https://www.beermoneyforum.com/threads/swisssafeway-com-reviews-scam-or-legit.188744/
- https://www.forexbrokerz.com/brokers/swiss-safeway-review
Evidence Box
We are investigating Swiss Safeway for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.
Targeted Content and Red Flags
About the Author
The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ChecksCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationOur Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit ForumThreads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
1.7
Based on 6 ratings
Malta White
Share
I lost everything I invested. Stay away , SCAM SCAM FRAUD ALERT
Isaac Evans
Share
Poor service and false promises! I trusted Swiss Safeway with my savings, and now I’m left with nothing. They duped me into believing their lies
Mia Harris
Share
This company is not regulated, and their practices feel shady. I wouldn’t trust them with my money.
James Jones
Share
The platform is full of glitches and delays, making it nearly impossible to trade effectively.
Emma Johnson
Share
Their customer support is unresponsive and doesn't solve any problems.
Anne Lopes
Share
Poor service and false promises! I trusted Swiss Safeway with my savings, and now I’m left with nothing. They duped me into believing their lies