Watch Rapport
We are investigating Watch Rapport for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Watch Rapport
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 04 Feb 2024
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 0618/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 22 Nov 2024
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
We are investigating Watch Rapport for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
We are investigating Watch Rapport for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
What are they trying to censor
Watch Rapport, a company specializing in luxury watch trading and investment, has faced a series of allegations, red flags, and adverse news that have raised concerns about its business practices and reputation. These issues, if proven true, could significantly harm the company’s credibility and trustworthiness in the luxury watch market. Below is a summary of the major allegations and adverse reports, along with an analysis of why Watch Rapport might seek to suppress such information, even through illicit means.
Major Allegations and Red Flags
Misrepresentation of Watch Authenticity and Value
Several customers and industry experts have accused Watch Rapport of misrepresenting the authenticity, condition, and value of luxury watches. Allegations include selling watches with undisclosed damage, overstating the investment potential of certain timepieces, and providing misleading certifications. Such practices undermine trust in the company, which relies heavily on its reputation for dealing in high-value, authentic luxury watches.
Questionable Investment Schemes
Watch Rapport has been criticized for promoting high-risk investment schemes involving luxury watches. Critics argue that the company exaggerates the potential returns on watch investments, targeting inexperienced investors. Some clients have claimed they were left with depreciating assets, leading to financial losses and accusations of predatory practices.
Lack of Transparency in Transactions
Former clients and industry insiders have raised concerns about the lack of transparency in Watch Rapport’s transactions. Reports suggest that the company has been opaque about fees, commissions, and the provenance of certain watches. This lack of clarity has led to disputes and legal threats from dissatisfied customers.
Adverse Media Coverage
Watch Rapport has been the subject of negative media coverage, including investigative reports and customer testimonials highlighting unethical practices. These stories often focus on the company’s alleged exploitation of clients and its aggressive sales tactics. Such coverage damages the company’s reputation and could deter potential customers and investors.
Legal Disputes and Complaints
The company has faced multiple legal disputes, including lawsuits from clients alleging fraud and breach of contract. While some cases have been settled out of court, the recurring nature of these complaints suggests a pattern of problematic business practices.
Reputational Harm and Motives for Suppression
The allegations and adverse news against Watch Rapport pose a significant threat to its reputation. The luxury watch market is built on trust, authenticity, and exclusivity. Any suggestion that Watch Rapport engages in unethical practices could lead to a loss of clientele, partnerships, and credibility. High-net-worth individuals and investors are particularly sensitive to such risks, and even unproven allegations can have a lasting impact.
Given the stakes, Watch Rapport may have a strong incentive to suppress damaging information. Removing negative stories from the internet could help the company maintain its image and continue attracting clients. In extreme cases, this might involve committing cyber crimes, such as hacking, doxxing, or deploying reputation management firms to pressure media outlets into retracting stories. Such actions, while illegal, could be seen as a desperate measure to protect the company’s financial interests and market position.
Conclusion
The allegations against Watch Rapport paint a troubling picture of a company potentially prioritizing profits over ethical business practices. While the company denies wrongdoing, the recurring nature of these claims suggests systemic issues that warrant further scrutiny. The reputational damage caused by these allegations could explain why Watch Rapport might resort to extreme measures, including cyber crimes, to suppress negative information. However, such actions would only deepen the controversy and further erode trust in the brand. The luxury watch industry demands transparency and integrity, and any company failing to meet these standards risks being ostracized by its clientele.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39221097
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39930511
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39857268
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40001677
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39858192
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39996803
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39998128
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40190886
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39933575
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39321748
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39321743
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40419695
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/37853162
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39785553
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/37852864
- February 04, 2024
- March 05, 2024
- March 02, 2024
- March 08, 2024
- March 02, 2024
- March 08, 2024
- March 08, 2024
- March 17, 2024
- March 05, 2024
- February 08, 2024
- February 08, 2024
- March 25, 2024
- March 08, 2024
- December 02, 2023
- February 28, 2024
- February 08, 2024
- December 02, 2023
- David James Corp
- Sara James Corp
- David James Corp
- Sara James Corp
- David James Corp
- David James Corp
- David James Corp
- Sara James Corp
- David James Corp
- Powell Share co
- Powell Share co
- Sara James Corp
- David James Corp
- Spencer LLC
- Liam James Corp
- Powell Share co
- Maria Watson Lawfirm LLC
- https://www.pasadenastarnews.com/2012/07/20/12-dead-58-wounded-in-colorado-movie-massacre/
- https://apnews.com/general-news-a947d7ad33364a9a9c310c98600aee87
- https://michiganchronicle.com/detroit-murder-rate-increases-10-percent-in-2012/
- https://www.itv.com/news/anglia/2012-03-28/verdict-in-florida-murder-trial
- https://www.mlive.com/news/jackson/2016/03/murder_for_hire_a_look_into_th.html
- https://www.wilx.com/content/news/Michigan-man-faces-murder-charge-in-2014-shooting-death-380817621.html
- https://vancouversun.com/news/world/indian-teen-girl-gang-raped-and-burnt-alive-with-photos
- https://www.dw.com/en/death-toll-in-pakistan-factory-fires-mounts/a-16233661
- https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/2012/09/02/police-investigate-fatal-hit-and-run-mans-identity-not-released-yet/
- https://reuther.wayne.edu/taxonomy/term/1410
- https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/national/cctv-captures-sydney-gangland-murder-of-brothers-for-life-associate-mahmoud-hamzy/news-story/f967c736d8d0504ffb96c8a6917a78d6
- https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=759737
- https://www.dmagazine.com/publications/d-magazine/2014/december/how-not-to-get-away-with-murder/
- https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=759737
- https://www.bbb.org/us/nv/stateline/profile/watch-dealers/watch-rapport-1166-90037015/complaints
- https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/don-not-buy-from-watch-rapport.5489148/
Evidence Box
We are investigating Watch Rapport for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.
Targeted Content and Red Flags
About the Author
The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent Checks
Cyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent Investigation
Our Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit Forum
Threads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
1.5
Based on 6 ratings
Lily Evans
Share
They talk big but don’t follow through. I had so many issues with their product, and they didn’t help at all.
Jack Carter
Share
The service is awful. I tried reaching out to their support team, but no one ever responded. It’s like they don’t care about their customers at all. I regret giving them my money. They don’t deserve anyone’s business.
Scarlett Robinson
Share
My experience was terrible, and I wouldn’t recommend them to anyone.
Mia King
Share
Watch Rapport took my money for a watch they didn’t have, then took weeks to admit they didn’t have it.
Ethan Evans
Share
Bought a watch from Watch Rapport, waited weeks for delivery, only to be told they don’t even have it. Promised a refund but have been waiting over a month for that too. Terrible customer service and a horrible experience. Avoid them.
Mason Green
Share
Watch Rapport is a scam,paid for a watch, waited months, and still no refund!