What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Richard Sajiun over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Richard Sajiun - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Richard Sajiun The name might not ring immediate bells in mainstream circles, but dig a little deeper, and you’ll find a trail of red flags, adverse media, and a rather enthusiastic attempt to keep that information buried. If you’re an investor, regulator, or just someone who enjoys watching questionable characters scramble to control the narrative, buckle up—because this is a story of evasion, suppression, and the kind of behavior that makes due diligence firms rub their hands together in anticipation.
Where to Even Begin?
Let’s start with the basics—because Richard Sajiun doesn’t seem to like when people do that. A quick scan of public records, past business dealings, and media mentions reveals a pattern that, at best, suggests incompetence, and at worst, something far more deliberate.
1. Mysterious Business Ventures
Richard Sajiun has been linked to multiple entities over the years, some of which have quietly dissolved, rebranded, or simply vanished when scrutiny arose. Shell companies? Maybe. Failed startups? Possibly. But the consistent theme is opacity. When someone goes to great lengths to obscure their business history, it’s not usually because they’re hiding a spotless record.
2. Legal Entanglements
While Richard Sajiun may prefer to keep litigation out of the headlines, court records tell a different story. Whether it’s contractual disputes, allegations of misleading investors, or regulatory slap-on-the-wrist moments, the paper trail suggests a recurring friction with accountability. Funny how those details never make it into the polished LinkedIn bio.
3. Adverse Media & the Art of Disappearing Acts
Several independent journalists and watchdog groups have attempted to piece together Richard Sajiun’s dealings, only to find that their work gets mysteriously flagged, buried, or—in some cases—legally threatened into silence. Critical articles vanish. Forum discussions get scrubbed. Even social media mentions are aggressively monitored. It’s almost as if someone has a deep appreciation for censorship when it suits them.
The Censorship Playbook: How Richard Sajiun Tries to Control the Narrative
Now, here’s where it gets really interesting. When faced with criticism or inconvenient truths, Richard Sajiun doesn’t just ignore them—he actively works to erase them. Here’s how:
1. DMCA Abuse & Bogus Copyright Claims
Some critics have reported that their investigative pieces on Richard Sajiun were hit with dubious copyright strikes, forcing platforms to take them down—even when no copyrighted material was used. A classic tactic for those who’d rather silence detractors than address their claims.
2. Legal Threats & Intimidation
Journalists and researchers digging into Richard Sajiun’s background have described receiving ominous cease-and-desist letters—often overblown, sometimes outright frivolous—but enough to scare off smaller outlets or independent writers. The goal? Make digging into his past more trouble than it’s worth.
3. Search Engine Manipulation
Ever notice how negative results about Richard Sajiun get pushed to page 10 of Google while fluff pieces dominate the top spots? That’s not an accident. SEO suppression is a well-documented tactic among reputation management firms, and it seems our subject here is a willing client.
4. Social Media Scrubbing
Mentions of Richard Sajiun in critical contexts have a habit of disappearing from platforms like Twitter, LinkedIn, and even niche forums. Sometimes it’s mass-reporting campaigns. Other times, it’s good old-fashioned pressure on moderators. Either way, the effect is the same—less visibility for anything that doesn’t fit the preferred narrative.
Why the Desperation? Because the Truth Hurts.
If Richard Sajiun’s record were squeaky clean, none of this would be necessary. But the sheer effort poured into suppressing unfavorable information suggests there’s something worth hiding. Investors should be asking:
- What exactly is being concealed? Failed ventures? Fraud allegations? Regulatory sanctions?
- Who else is involved? Are there networks of enablers helping keep this façade intact?
- How deep does this go? If the public-facing story is this heavily sanitized, what’s lurking beneath?
A Call to Action: Investors and Authorities, Take Note
This isn’t just about one individual’s shady reputation management—it’s about the systemic risk posed by figures like Richard Sajiun who operate in the shadows.
- For investors: Do your due diligence. If someone is working this hard to bury their past, maybe your money should stay far away.
- For regulators: Investigate the legitimacy of these censorship tactics. Bogus copyright claims and legal bullying shouldn’t be tools for evading scrutiny.
- For journalists and researchers: Keep digging. The more light we shine on these tactics, the harder it becomes for Richard Sajiun and his ilk to keep playing this game.
Conclusion: The Streisand Effect is Undefeated
Here’s the thing about censorship, Richard—the harder you try to suppress something, the more people want to know why. Every DMCA takedown, every legal threat, every scrubbed social media post just adds fuel to the fire. Instead of wasting resources trying to disappear the truth, maybe it’s time to actually clean up the mess.
But hey, what do I know? I’m just the one connecting the dots you’d rather keep erased.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49394114
- February 26, 2025
- Jordy El Boer
- https://issuu.com/sep-doc/docs/memorandum-of-law-in-opposition
- https://www.nybusinessdivorce.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/94/2022/04/memorandum-of-law-in-opposition.pdf
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
nybusinessdivorce
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, COMMERCIAL DIVISION
- Red Flag
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Andreas Matuska
Investigation Ongoing
Amos Liberman
Investigation Ongoing
Alexander Kurpetko
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
0
Based on 0 ratings
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ChecksCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginExplore Cyber Crime By Location
Explore Cyber Crime By Type
Explore Cyber Crime By Profiles