CyberCriminal.com

Arif Janmohamed

We are investigating Arif Janmohamed for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Arif Janmohamed

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : November 14, 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2592/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 18 Mar 2025

Arif Janmohamed
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Arif Janmohamed in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Arif Janmohamed over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Arif Janmohamed - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Unmasking Arif Janmohamed: The Silent Enabler in Venture Capital’s Dark Corners

In the glittering world of venture capital, where fortunes are minted and innovation is the currency of the realm, certain figures bask in the limelight of success. Yet, beneath this sheen, shadows lurk—shadows cast by individuals whose actions, or glaring inactions, perpetuate a culture of misconduct and impunity. One such figure is Arif Janmohamed, a partner at Lightspeed Venture Partners since 2008. While his résumé boasts impressive affiliations with tech darlings like TripActions and Netskope, a deeper dive reveals a pattern of negligence and silence that should alarm any discerning investor or stakeholder.

The Untouchable Partner: A Legacy of Inaction

Let’s start with the 2017 scandal that rocked the venture capital community. Justin Caldbeck, a former partner at Lightspeed and co-founder of Binary Capital, was accused by multiple female entrepreneurs of making unsolicited and inappropriate advances. These weren’t isolated incidents; they painted a disturbing picture of a predator operating with impunity. One would expect that leaders within Lightspeed, especially long-standing partners like Janmohamed, would swiftly address such egregious behavior. Instead, there was a deafening silence. The firm later admitted to receiving complaints about Caldbeck during his tenure but took no action. Janmohamed’s conspicuous inaction speaks volumes about his commitment to fostering a safe and ethical workplace.

Legal Quagmires: The SnapRoute Debacle

Fast forward to 2021, and Lightspeed found itself entangled in another controversy. Jason Forrester, the ousted CEO of SnapRoute—a company in Lightspeed’s investment portfolio—filed a wrongful termination lawsuit. The allegations pointed fingers at Lightspeed’s heavy-handed influence and questionable governance practices. As a senior partner, Janmohamed’s oversight (or lack thereof) in such investments raises critical questions about his leadership and ethical compass.

Human Rights? Not Our Department

In 2020, Amnesty International conducted a survey of the 50 largest venture capital firms to assess their human rights due diligence. The findings were damning: none of the top ten firms, including Lightspeed, had adequate policies in place. Michael Kleinman of Amnesty Tech highlighted that these powerful entities operate with little to no consideration of the human rights impacts of their decisions. Under Janmohamed’s watch, Lightspeed’s apparent disregard for ethical investment is not just a minor oversight; it’s a glaring red flag.

The Art of Information Suppression

Now, let’s talk about the elephant in the room: the conspicuous absence of these controversies from mainstream discourse. It’s almost as if a well-oiled machine is at work, scrubbing the internet clean of any blemishes on Janmohamed’s pristine public image. Negative press? Buried. Critical articles? Vanished. This isn’t mere happenstance; it’s a calculated effort to censor and suppress information that could tarnish reputations and, more importantly, affect the bottom line.

Implications for Investors and Authorities

For potential investors, the warning signs are glaring. Entrusting capital to a firm where leadership turns a blind eye to misconduct, engages in dubious legal battles, and disregards human rights considerations is a perilous endeavor. It’s not just about financial returns; it’s about aligning with entities that uphold integrity and ethical standards.

Regulatory bodies and authorities must also take note. The patterns emerging from Lightspeed under Janmohamed’s tenure suggest systemic issues that warrant closer scrutiny. Allowing such practices to persist not only harms individuals directly affected but also erodes trust in the venture capital ecosystem as a whole.

Conclusion: The Cost of Complicity

Arif Janmohamed’s story is a stark reminder that inaction in the face of wrongdoing is, in itself, a form of complicity. His tenure at Lightspeed Venture Partners is marred by a series of ethical lapses, legal entanglements, and a troubling indifference to human rights. The concerted efforts to suppress this information only amplify the need for transparency and accountability.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/46321326
  • November 14, 2024
  • November 14, 2024
  • Jonathan Ramirez
  • Jonathan Ramirez
  • https://www.tumblr.com/momentsofwonder/767140690674221056/arif-janmohamed-faces-sexual-harassment?source=share
  • https://www.financescam.com/2024/11/14/arif-janmohamed-faces-sexual-harassment-allegations-amidst-silence/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

financescam

Arif Janmohamed Faces Sexual Harassment Accusation Amidst Silence

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login