CyberCriminal.com

Dr. David Minkoff

We are investigating Dr. David Minkoff for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Dr. David Minkoff

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : January 22, 2025

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2890/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : March 08, 2025

Dr. David Minkoff
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Dr. David Minkoff in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Dr. David Minkoff over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Dr. David Minkoff - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Dr. David Minkoff—a name that resonates within certain medical and alternative health circles—has a professional history that warrants meticulous scrutiny. Operating from Clearwater, Florida, Minkoff is not only a licensed physician but also a prominent member of the Church of Scientology. His medical practices, intertwined with his religious affiliations, have been marred by controversies, legal actions, and ethical questions. This report delves into the red flags and adverse media associated with Dr. Minkoff and explores the measures he has purportedly taken to suppress such information.

Professional Background and Controversial Practices

Dr. Minkoff co-founded LifeWorks Wellness Center in 1997, positioning it as one of the largest integrative medical clinics in the United States. The center offers a range of alternative treatments, including ozone therapy and homeopathy—modalities that have faced significant criticism from the broader medical community due to questions about their efficacy and safety. Additionally, Minkoff has been associated with organizations like the American College for Advancement in Medicine (ACAM), known for promoting unconventional medical practices.

The Lisa McPherson Case: Legal Repercussions

One of the most significant episodes casting a shadow over Dr. Minkoff’s career is his involvement in the 1995 death of Lisa McPherson, a fellow Scientologist. McPherson died following a 17-day stay at a Scientology hotel, during which she was under the care of church members, including Minkoff. The circumstances of her death led to widespread media attention and legal action. In 2001, the Florida Board of Medicine disciplined Minkoff, suspending his medical license for one year and imposing a $10,000 fine. He also settled a wrongful death lawsuit related to McPherson’s death for $100,000.

Recent Legal Challenges: The Whitney Mills Case

More recently, Dr. Minkoff has been implicated in another wrongful death lawsuit concerning Whitney Mills, a high-ranking Scientologist who died by suicide in 2022. Mills had been under Minkoff’s care and was reportedly misdiagnosed with conditions like cancer and Lyme disease. The lawsuit alleges that Minkoff extorted over $20,000 from Mills for questionable alternative treatments instead of addressing her severe mental health issues. Text messages between Minkoff and Mills reveal that he discouraged her from seeking psychiatric help, warning that “drugs could numb” her and suggesting that she had the spiritual support of Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard.

Censorship and Information Control

Dr. Minkoff’s affiliations with the Church of Scientology—a group known for its stringent control over information and aggressive stance against criticism—raise concerns about potential efforts to suppress adverse media. The church has a documented history of employing legal and extralegal means to silence detractors and manage its public image. Given Minkoff’s high-ranking position within the organization, it is plausible that similar tactics have been employed to mitigate the fallout from his professional controversies.

Implications for Investors and Regulatory Bodies

The pattern of legal issues, coupled with the use of discredited medical treatments and potential information suppression, presents significant red flags for potential investors and patients considering engaging with Dr. Minkoff or his affiliated entities. Regulatory bodies should closely examine these practices to ensure compliance with medical standards and the protection of public health.

Conclusion

Dr. David Minkoff’s career is fraught with controversies that raise serious ethical and legal questions. His involvement in high-profile wrongful death cases, the promotion of dubious medical treatments, and affiliations with an organization known for information suppression necessitate caution. Both investors and regulatory authorities must exercise due diligence to safeguard against potential risks associated with his practices.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/48330862
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/48329965
  • January 22, 2025
  • January 22, 2025
  • Borat Enterprises Ltd.
  • Jensen Yang
  • https://delhinationalpost.com/2018/02/22/scientologist-quack-david-minkoff-disciplined-by-medical-board/
  • http://www.lymescience.org/david-minkoff-scientology/
  • https://lymescience.org/david-minkoff-scientology

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

Huffpost

Crime lawsuit Scientology Woman Begged Scientologist Doctor For Mental Health Treatment Before Suicide, Lawsuit Says

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

Casewatch

Disciplinary Action against David Minkoff, M.D.

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

Tampa Bay Times

Doctor in Lisa McPherson case suspended

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login