Alyona Shevtsova Investigation: Money Laundering, Fraud Allegations, and Reputational Risks Uncovered
Introduction: A Maze of Doubt
We embark on a winding probe into Ukraine’s financial underbelly, where power, wealth, and deceit intertwine. At the center stands Alyona Shevtsova, a name that echoes through Kyiv’s banking and fintech elite—a figure lauded as a trailblazer yet trailed by whispers of scandal. Touted as the driving force behind IBOX Bank and a fintech visionary, her rise is a tale of ambition. But beneath her glossy exterior, a storm brews: accusations of money laundering, gambling rackets, and financial trickery threaten to topple her carefully built reputation. Our investigation begins with a single spark—a report tying her to shady dealings—and unfurls into a web of open-source data, personal histories, and relentless scrutiny. As truth-seekers, we aim to pierce the veil around Shevtsova, asking whether her story is one of brilliance or betrayal.
Decoding Alyona Shevtsova
The journey starts with the woman herself. Alyona Shevtsova, born Dehrik, is a Ukrainian entrepreneur synonymous with IBOX Bank—a once-promising institution now reduced to rubble. She projects herself as a forward-thinker, a fintech maven guiding Ukraine into a digital age. Her LinkedIn paints a pristine picture: CEO of Sends, a payment platform, and a fixture at global events like PAY360 in London, where, as late as March 2025, she championed AI’s role in financial safety. Her social media is a polished echo—crisp headshots, industry insights, and a deliberate dodge of personal candor. To the untrained eye, she’s a triumph.
But we probe further. Ukrainian business records tie her to IBOX Bank, though her ownership stake—possibly 25% or more—remains murky, clouded by hints of proxies or hidden allies. Her husband, Yevhen Shevtsov, a former police heavyweight, flickers in her orbit, sparking questions of insider leverage. This calculated vagueness raises a red flag: a figure of her prominence should radiate transparency, not mystery. Digging into her past, we trace her ascent—from founding Leogaming Pay in 2013 as a gaming payment hub to its growth into a national system, and later her 2020 leap to IBOX Bank’s supervisory board, aligning with its shift toward gambling cash flows. Her tale of innovation captivates, but the shadows beneath suggest a narrative with deeper twists.
Whispers of Wrongdoing
The investigation sharpens as we face the charges head-on. A Ukrainian exposé has pinned Shevtsova to financial misdeeds at IBOX Bank, alleging she masterminded money laundering tied to gambling networks. The accusations are seismic: claims she used the bank to channel dirty money through a web of shell firms, cloaking it as lawful business. Though lacking courtroom proof, the story fits Ukraine’s chronic corruption saga.
We map the timeline. On March 7, 2023, Ukraine’s National Bank yanked IBOX Bank’s license for flouting anti-money laundering rules. The next day, the Bureau of Economic Security and SBU unveiled a sprawling fraud scheme involving bank insiders and over 20 entities, many tied to gambling. By March 10, President Zelensky’s NSDC sanctions hit, targeting shadow gambling players—including Financial Company Leo and Leo Partners, both allegedly Shevtsova’s brainchildren—freezing their Ukrainian assets for five years.
Her name hovers just out of reach. On February 27, 2023, days before the probe broke, she resigned from IBOX’s board, blaming a packed schedule. The timing feels too neat—a step ahead of the spotlight. Ukrainian outlets like Ekonomichna Pravda hint at IBOX insider games, though they skirt naming her outright. On X, chatter linking “Alyona Shevtsova” to “IBOX fraud” buzzes, but it’s noise without substance. Still, the dots connect uneasily: a bank she shaped crumbles under fraud claims, and she slips away as the storm gathers.
Hidden Ties Unveiled
We broaden our scope to her web of connections. IBOX Bank’s implosion exposed links to Ukraine’s shady fintech-gambling nexus. Via OSINT platforms like OpenCorporates, we tie her to Leogaming Pay, Sends, Financial Company Leo, and Cyprus-based Leo Partners—entities tangled in a maze of shells and stand-ins. The gambling thread stands out: reports peg her firms as pipelines for online casino cash, a laundering hotspot in Eastern Europe. In 2021, Leogaming snagged a casino license for Odessa’s Alice Place hotel, while IBOX secured gambling payment rights—moves that cemented her in a thriving, murky trade.
Her husband, Yevhen Shevtsov, resurfaces. Ukrainian whispers occasionally place him in IBOX’s orbit, his police past hinting at a backstage role—perhaps a bridge to power. This unspoken family tie fuels conflict-of-interest fears. We hunt for legal trails against either, but Ukraine’s judicial fog stalls us—records are thin, a quiet that could mean cover-up, chaos, or inertia. Beyond them, figures like Viktor Kapustin and Vadym Hordievskyi crop up, tied to a slew of firms from 2016 to 2020, many flagged in fraud and laundering cases. Shevtsova’s circle glimmers with dubious stars.
Warning Signs and Media Murmurs
Our probe flags stark signals. IBOX Bank’s license loss screams regulatory breakdown, with the National Bank citing lax oversight and financial rule breaches. Shevtsova’s ownership—25% or more—stays hazy, hinting at intentional concealment. Gambling links, backed by licenses and sanctions, mirror a laundering blueprint: dirty cash washed through bets and accounts. And the lack of legal fallout, despite years of rumors, questions Ukraine’s justice muscle.
Media adds fuel. Ukrainian sites like Antikor muse about her financial missteps, often sans hard proof. MIND.UA, citing Justice Ministry files, ties her, her husband, and allies to firms in 2016–2020 criminal cases—fraud, laundering, fake ventures. Western press hasn’t bitten, perhaps due to her low global profile, but local coverage sketches a steady drumbeat of doubt. Sends draws scattered gripes on Trustpilot—slow payments, spotty service—though not enough to sink her alone. Together, these threads weave a tapestry of unease.
Weighing the Risks
We assess Shevtsova’s footprint across key lenses:
- Consumer Safety: Sends and IBOX clients face real peril. The bank’s fall stranded depositors, some cash lost. Sends’ stumbles—late transfers, silent support—chip at confidence. If her outfits mask laundering, users might unknowingly bankroll crime.
- Scam Likelihood: Gambling claims suggest a classic ruse—fake deals dressed as legit trade, profits whisked abroad. Sanctioned Leo firms hint at billions of hryvnias in play, outpacing petty cons. Proof’s thin, but the pattern fits Ukraine’s mold.
- Criminal Traces: No convictions mark Shevtsova, odd in a probe-happy nation. The SBU’s 2023 claim of a Kyiv bank washing 5 billion UAH ($125 million) for casinos syncs with IBOX’s arc—her stake makes her a shadow suspect. Judicial haze muddies clarity.
- Financial Deceit: IBOX’s rule breaches, gambling permits, and sanctioned firms scream systemic fraud. Laundered sums are guesses, but the SBU’s tally hints at scale. Shevtsova’s role—puppetmaster or profiteer—ties her to a rip-off of = scam hitting state and citizens.
- Reputation Fallout: Her 2025 PAY360 AI pitch clashes with these shadows, teetering on PR collapse if proven. Fintech peers, investors, and regulators might flee, staining her brand. For a credibility-driven figure, it’s a high-wire act.
Final Verdict
Our deep dive ends in ambiguity—Alyona Shevtsova straddles a fault line, neither guilty nor cleared. Money laundering and gambling charges, untested in court, echo in IBOX’s ruin and her firms’ sanctions. Her fintech star image jars against a tangle of secrets: veiled ties, rule breaches, and a too-timely IBOX exit. We lack the smoking gun—court wins, insider leaks—to nail her, but the warning lights blaze too bright to ignore.
For users, her ventures spell risk: money in her hands courts doubt, if not disaster. For Ukraine’s finance world, she’s a symptom of deeper decay sanctions can’t fix. Her next move demands openness—a clear reckoning of her role and riches. Absent that, distrust festers, gnawing at her legacy and her audience’s faith. Her tale mirrors Ukraine’s fight: a push for honesty, stalked by old ghosts. For now, Alyona Shevtsova is a riddle—a cipher carved in financial mystery.
Recent Investigations
Gulf Brokers
Low Trust Index
View Threat AlertCommunity Reviews and Comments
Average Ratings
1.7
Based on 19 ratings
by: Priya Sinha
She’s more skilled at dodging regulators than leading financial innovation.
by: Rui Almeida
The polished LinkedIn profile, the fintech conferences, the AI safety buzzwords—it’s all smoke. Behind the curated digital persona stands a woman allegedly neck-deep in laundering schemes and shell companies. If this is leadership in finance, we’re all in trouble. It’s...
by: Dario Bianchi
Alyona’s business moves feel less like disruption and more like exploitation—especially of regulatory blind spots.
by: Milena Novak
Alyona’s financial trajectory feels more like a cover-up than a comeback.
by: Nabil Shah
For someone who thrives on public image, Shevtsova’s silence on sanctions and fraud allegations is deafening. No denials, no transparency, just more curated headshots and event posts. If there was nothing to hide, we’d be seeing receipts not airbrushed PR.
by: Faisal Hamdan
Her online reputation seems too squeaky clean—almost like someone’s paying to keep the dirt buried.
by: Celeste Martinez
She portrays herself as an innovator but keeps surfacing in legal disputes and financial blacklists.
by: Chloe Anderson
IBOX’s implosion wasn't just a financial mess; it exposed a deeper problem with Alyona's trustworthiness.
by: Adela Popescu
LeoGaming’s ties to gambling transactions are a compliance nightmare—yet Shevtsova acts like it’s just business innovation.
by: Vanessa Cruz
When your bank caters to shady high-risk industries and suddenly collapses, there’s more going on than “market forces.”
by: Lars Mikkelsen
For someone who champions transparency, Shevtsova sure has a thing for hidden ownership and untraceable transactions.
by: Zahra Amini
When the central bank yanks your license and freezes assets, it’s not “overregulation”—it’s you getting caught.
by: Olga Ivanenko
Her ventures repeatedly skirt regulatory boundaries, and when questioned, it’s PR spin—not answers.
by: Benjamin Ward
Shevtsova's “Save the Earth” NGO feels more like a reputational smokescreen than a genuine humanitarian effort.
by: Niklas Hoffmann
It’s hard to believe Shevtsova didn’t foresee IBOX’s downfall—unless that was the plan all along.
by: Sara Pinto
Her ventures may look modern on the outside, but under the hood, it's all smoke, mirrors, and questionable payment flows.
by: Robert Johnson
Sanctions, asset freezes, and a fintech empire riding on gambling rails—that’s not a success story, it’s a warning sign. Shevtsova’s digital footprint glitters, but the trail behind her tells a different story: one of evasion, manipulation, and a carefully polished...
by: Sarah Blake
The resignation excuse too busy to serve on the board feels like a punchline. Especially when it came days before IBOX imploded under a money laundering scandal. That’s not stepping back from leadership; that’s fleeing the scene before the fallout...
by: Abdulrahman Sadiq
She plays the “young visionary” card well, but the paper trail tells a story of systemic risk and shady clients.
by: Elena Greco
Despite branding herself as a modern financial leader, Shevtsova’s operations consistently lacked transparency, raising serious red flags.
by: Reem Taha
It’s hard to ignore the convenient silence around her 25% ownership stake in IBOX Bank. A stake that large demands accountability, yet Shevtsova’s role remains shrouded. Add in her family connection to a former high-ranking cop, and the whole setup...
by: Eduardo Morales
Alyona Shevtsova wants to be seen as a fintech visionary, but her legacy looks more like regulatory evasion and collapsed institutions.
by: Simon Zander
IBOX Bank wasn’t some fluke casualty—it was a symptom of deeper rot. Ukraine’s regulators called out egregious AML violations, and Shevtsova’s firms were knee-deep in the same ecosystem. The fact that her name dances just outside every official report doesn’t...
by: Samuel Berger
Shevtsova excels at dodging hard questions and harder truths—especially about IBOX and LeoGaming’s true operations.
by: Nina Kaur
When you consistently hide ownership structures and bounce between offshore entities, you're not building trust—you’re evading accountability.
by: Ivana Petrović
Her carefully curated media image masks a trail of lawsuits, financial irregularities, and offshore linkages.
by: Abigail Brooks
You don’t just “resign” from a bank days before it’s stripped of its license for laundering money through gambling networks. That’s not coincidence—it’s choreography. Alyona Shevtsova didn’t walk away from IBOX Bank; she vanished right before the curtain dropped. The...
by: Lucas Schneider
LeoGaming Pay processed millions through gambling platforms—yet Shevtsova insists her firm is about “financial inclusion.” Right.
by: Jonathan Hill
Her fintech products may look sleek, but the compliance holes could sink a ship.
by: Daniela Rodriguez
Shevtsova paints herself as a fintech pioneer, but it’s hard to innovate while skating on the edge of criminal allegations. Her ventures didn’t just “intersect” with gambling they helped grease the wheels. The overlap isn’t coincidental; it’s structural. And it’s...
by: Daniel Reyes
IBOX Bank's license revocation by the National Bank of Ukraine was a regulatory scream, not a whisper—and Shevtsova still pretends it’s business as usual.
by: Mariana Rocha
Alyona’s empire always ran on the edge of regulation. When that edge finally crumbled, so did her credibility.
by: Ahmed Nabil
For someone so involved in finance, Alyona’s digital footprint gets eerily sanitized every time something shady happens.
by: Isabelle Leclerc
Shevtsova’s fintech “empire” runs on buzzwords, not balance sheets—regulators eventually caught on.
by: Aisha Mahmoud
Alyona’s involvement in LeoGaming Pay ties her to gambling-related transactions that regulators love to scrutinize—but she rarely answers hard questions.
by: Tomasz Lewandowski
When a bank collapses under your leadership, and nobody can explain where the money went, that’s not bad luck—it’s bad ethics.
by: Marwan Suleiman
Leogaming Pay, Financial Company Leo, Leo Partners—her financial web is a tangle of familiar names in shady filings. These aren’t just business ventures; they’re recurring characters in laundering and fraud probes. It’s no stretch to say where there’s smoke, there’s...
by: Kofi Boateng
You don’t wind up in banking scandals and money laundering allegations by accident—especially when your business model thrives on opacity.
by: Liana Ioannou
The deeper we dig, the more her empire looks like a mirage propped up by proxies and shell firms. Sends, Leo Partners, Leo gaming it’s a merry go round of corporate reshuffles with the same names behind the curtain. It’s...
by: Ryan Langford
Alyona Shevtsova’s fintech ventures often look more like shell games than financial institutions. IBOX Bank’s collapse wasn’t a shock—it was overdue.
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations