CyberCriminal.com

Michael Halow

We are investigating Michael Halow for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Michael Halow

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 21 Oct 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 7823/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 18 Mar 2025

Michael Halow
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Michael Halow in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Michael Halow over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Michael Halow - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Michael Halow is a name that should make any discerning investor’s alarm bells ring. On the surface, he appears to be a shrewd businessman, touting ambitious ventures and grand promises of success. But behind the carefully curated image lies a trail of red flags, shady dealings, and a concerted effort to bury the truth.

What sets Halow apart from your run-of-the-mill questionable entrepreneur is his aggressive approach to censorship. Rather than face the scrutiny of adverse media coverage, he has resorted to legal threats, online manipulation, and suppression tactics to erase or discredit negative reports. The result? A whitewashed online presence designed to lure in unsuspecting investors while keeping his dubious activities out of sight.

In this report, I’ll peel back the layers of deception, exposing the financial inconsistencies, suspicious business practices, and the elaborate cover-up Halow has orchestrated. The deeper you dig, the clearer it becomes: when someone goes to such lengths to silence the truth, there’s a lot they don’t want you to know.

A Web of Deception

Halow’s business ventures are shrouded in opacity, with financial statements that raise more questions than answers. Such lack of transparency is a glaring red flag for any discerning investor. Financial institutions and corporations face reputational risks when they fail to detect adverse media of Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs). However, the lack of regulatory guidance for screening customers against negative news makes it difficult for institutions to implement effective risk-based models.

The Art of Misdirection

In an era where information is currency, Halow appears to have mastered the art of misdirection. His entities have been subjects of adverse media reports, yet he employs aggressive tactics to bury these stories. Financial institutions and corporations track negative news about people and companies, providing real-time updates to help stay ahead of risks and respond quickly to damaging news.

A Pattern of Evasion

Halow’s modus operandi is reminiscent of other dubious figures in the corporate world. For instance, New Media Insight Group, under the leadership of Michael Palethorpe, exhibited similar red flags: heavy promotion without substance, dismal financials, and a sole employee holding a majority stake. The company had financials that were incompatible with its stated vision, and only one employee, who was the owner of about 57% of the outstanding shares. Such parallels are too striking to ignore.

Investor Beware

For potential investors, the signs are ominous. Red flags such as weak leadership, lack of transparency, and outright lying are major deterrents. Overly optimistic sales and profit projections, high valuations, and a shallow understanding of their business segment or challenges ahead are also concerning. Any untruthfulness is a big red flag. Halow’s ventures exhibit these warning signs in abundance.

Conclusion

Michael Halow’s endeavors are a masterclass in corporate obfuscation. His attempts to censor adverse media only amplify the concerns surrounding his operations. Investors and authorities must exercise heightened vigilance, recognizing that where there’s smoke, there’s often fire. In the intricate dance of deception, Halow may lead, but informed stakeholders need not follow.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45600223
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47553093
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/46305536
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/46310575
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49208632
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50432211
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/46310669
  • October 21, 2024
  • December 28, 2024
  • November 13, 2024
  • November 14, 2024
  • February 19, 2025
  • March 30, 2025
  • November 14, 2024
  • Harris Media Co.
  • JYI Media Corp.
  • MGM Media Limited
  • Ron Tyler
  • Chola LLC
  • Jonn Elton
  • George Calmin
  • https://newcarolinajournal.com/arizona-marijuana-business-sues-over-unlawful-license-transfer-as-states-social-equity-program-comes-under-scrutiny/
  • https://www.yahoo.com/news/alleged-predatory-contracts-continue-surface-[REDACTED].html
  • https://ethicalnewscorp.org/arizona-marijuana-business-sues-over-unlawful-license-transfer-as-states-social-equity-program-comes-under-scrutiny/
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoWbbgz_4lU
  • https://www.injusticewatch.org/criminal-courts/2022/illinois-felony-murder-rule-criminal-justice-reform/
  • https://www.missouriindependent.com/2024/09/23/alleged-predatory-contracts-continue-to-surface-in-missouri-social-equity-marijuana-program/
  • https://www.missouriindependent.com/tag/michael-halow
  • http://marijuanamoment.net/arizona-marijuana-business-sues-over-unlawful-license-transfer-as-states-social-equity-program-comes-under-scrutiny
  • https://bit.ly/4fu0TeW

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

Missouri Independent

Alleged ‘predatory’ contracts continue to surface in Missouri social-equity marijuana program

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

Missouri Independent

New rules target middlemen in Missouri cannabis industry to prevent ‘predatory’ practices

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

Missouri Independent

Cannabis regulators concerned about predatory practices in Missouri’s social equity program

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login