CyberCriminal.com

Dr. Simon Ourian

We are investigating Dr. Simon Ourian for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Dr. Simon Ourian

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : August 23, 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2232/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 2 Apr 2025

Dr. Simon Ourian
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Dr. Simon Ourian in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Dr. Simon Ourian over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Dr. Simon Ourian - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

​Dr. Simon Ourian—a name that resonates with celebrity allure, boasting a clientele that reportedly includes the Kardashians, Lady Gaga, and other A-list personalities. His Beverly Hills clinic, Epione Medical Corporation, is often portrayed as the epitome of cosmetic innovation. Yet, beneath this glossy exterior lies a series of troubling allegations, legal entanglements, and aggressive tactics aimed at silencing critics. As an investigative journalist committed to uncovering the truth, I’ve delved into the murky waters of Dr. Ourian’s professional conduct to reveal a narrative that potential investors and patients deserve to know.​

A History of Medical Misconduct

In 2009, the Medical Board of California placed Dr. Ourian on a five-year probation following multiple allegations of gross negligence and incompetence. Patients reported severe injuries from his trademarked “Coolaser” treatments, with some experiencing debilitating burns and scarring. Alarmingly, Dr. Ourian admitted to neglecting proper patient records, citing concerns that documentation could be used against him in legal disputes. Such disregard for fundamental medical protocols not only jeopardizes patient safety but also raises serious questions about his professional ethics.​

Enabling Unlicensed Practice

Further compounding these concerns is Dr. Ourian’s admitted collaboration with an unlicensed practitioner, allowing unauthorized surgical procedures within his clinic. This blatant violation of medical standards underscores a troubling pattern of prioritizing personal gain over patient welfare.​

Retaliation Against Whistleblowers

Dr. Adam Rubinstein, a board-certified plastic surgeon and patient advocate, sought to shed light on these issues through his “Exposed” video series. In response, Dr. Ourian allegedly orchestrated a smear campaign involving fake negative reviews and defamatory content aimed at discrediting Dr. Rubinstein. This retaliatory behavior not only attempts to suppress legitimate criticism but also manipulates public perception through deceitful means.

Manipulating Online Perception

The alleged use of fake reviews and social media manipulation to tarnish Dr. Rubinstein’s reputation reflects a broader strategy of controlling the narrative by silencing dissent. Such tactics are not only unethical but also potentially illegal, highlighting a willingness to engage in deceptive practices to maintain a favorable public image.​

Conclusion

Dr. Simon Ourian’s professional history is marred by serious allegations of medical negligence, unethical collaborations, and aggressive efforts to suppress criticism. His attempts to censor adverse information through retaliatory actions and manipulation of online platforms reveal a concerning disregard for transparency and accountability. Potential investors and patients should exercise extreme caution, recognizing that behind the celebrity endorsements lies a record fraught with red flags. Regulatory authorities must also take decisive action to investigate and address these issues, ensuring that patient safety and ethical standards are upheld in the medical community.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44051691
  • August 23, 2024
  • naila llc
  • https://reappropriate.co/2014/04/the-detroit-news-publishes-weird-irresponsible-alternate-history-of-the-vincent-chin-murder-nealrubin_dn/
  • https://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/kardashian-cosmetic-surgeon-dr-simon-ourian-is-sued-for-defamation-11673773

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

miaminewtimes

Lawsuit Claims Kardashian Surgeon Paid Russian Bots to Defame Miami Doctor

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login