CyberCriminal.com

1808 Vintage

We are investigating 1808 Vintage for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : 1808 Vintage

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 20 Sep 2022

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 46456/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 22 Nov 2024

1808 Vintage
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about 1808 Vintage in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

We are investigating 1808 Vintage for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury

We are investigating 1808 Vintage for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury

What are they trying to censor

1808 Vintage, an online retailer of vintage-style products, faces mounting allegations that undermine its credibility and trustworthiness. These claims revolve around fraudulent practices, customer mistreatment, and deliberate attempts to suppress criticism, which collectively tarnish its reputation.

Major Allegations and Red Flags

Unfulfilled Orders
Customers widely report paying for items that were never delivered, signaling potential fraud. This consistent failure damages trust and questions the company’s operational legitimacy.

Defective and Misrepresented Products
Reviews allege that products, when delivered, are inferior to advertised standards, reflecting deceptive marketing practices. Items often fail to match promotional images, leaving customers feeling misled.

Poor Customer Service
Numerous buyers have cited unresponsive communication and refusal to provide refunds, contributing to the perception of an uncaring and unethical organization.

Delayed Deliveries
Delivery times often stretch to months, with many customers giving up hope of ever receiving their orders. These delays exacerbate dissatisfaction and tarnish the brand’s image.

Deceptive Marketing and Manipulative Practices
Critics claim 1808 Vintage deploys manipulative advertising tactics, such as creating urgency with “limited-time offers,” to pressure customers into quick purchases.

Suppression of Criticism
There are allegations that 1808 Vintage has attempted to silence detractors through manipulative means, including reporting negative reviews and legal threats to critics. These efforts to control public perception only heighten suspicions about the company’s transparency.

Reputational Impact

These allegations paint a damning picture of 1808 Vintage as a business that prioritizes profit over ethical practices and customer satisfaction. The fraudulent transactions, coupled with poor service, depict a company unwilling to meet its obligations. Suppressing negative reviews and criticism further alienates potential customers, reinforcing the notion that the company operates with questionable motives.

The damage to 1808 Vintage’s reputation is significant, discouraging both new customers and repeat business. Negative press circulates quickly, and the growing volume of adverse reviews makes it nearly impossible for the brand to regain trust without substantial corrective action.

 

Why 1808 Vintage Might Seek Story Removal

The stories highlighting these issues are a direct threat to 1808 Vintage’s survival. Reports of fraud and mistreatment damage its appeal to both customers and potential business partners. With sales and reputation at risk, the company may view erasing this negative coverage as its only path forward. However, should the brand engage in unethical acts like cybercrime to suppress these stories, it risks legal action and even more devastating public exposure, deepening its crisis.

 

Conclusion

The controversies surrounding 1808 Vintage illustrate systemic issues that harm customers and destroy trust. While the company might seek to erase damaging reports, accountability and meaningful reforms remain the only legitimate route to rebuilding its reputation.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/28872613
  • Sep 20, 2022
  • Jimmy Mathew
  • https://complainslist-blog.tumblr.com/post/695908677702549504/produtos-1808-vintage
  • https://www.reclameaqui.com.br/1808-vintage/produtos_Y2KrkbKSTPu1GJ5J/
  • https://www.reclameaqui.com.br/empresa/1808-vintage/

Evidence Box

We are investigating 1808 Vintage for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.

Targeted Content and Red Flags

reclameaqui.com.br

PRODUTOS (Editado pelo Reclame AQUI)

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

intelligenceline.com

1808 Vintage’s Toxic Legacy: Broken Promises, Angry Customers, and Failing Ethics

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

financescam.com

1808 Vintage: A Legacy of Broken Promises and Consumer Betrayal

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database

Escalate This Case

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert