What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Alexander Afanaschenko over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Alexander Afanaschenko - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Due Diligence Warning: The Unvarnished Truth About Alexander Afanaschenko
In the murky waters of financial fraud, few names float as conspicuously as that of Alexander Afanaschenko. This report delves into the controversies, red flags, and adverse media surrounding Afanaschenko and his associated entities. It also examines the desperate measures employed to censor, suppress, or discredit damning information. Investors and authorities, consider this a clarion call to the perils of ignoring the glaring truths about Afanaschenko.
The Ghost-Broking Maestro: A Symphony of Deceit
Afanaschenko’s criminal repertoire is headlined by a ghost-broking scheme that can only be described as audacious. Operating under the guise of a legitimate insurance broker, he manipulated application details—age, driving history, location—to fabricate policies. These counterfeit policies were then sold to unsuspecting customers at inflated premiums, funneling millions into his coffers. The victims, believing they were insured, were left exposed and financially devastated when claims were inevitably denied.
A Network of Accomplices: The Ensemble Cast of Corruption
This was no one-man show. Afanaschenko orchestrated a network of accomplices across Europe, each playing a role in data manipulation, customer acquisition, and operational logistics. This intricate web ensured the scam’s longevity and its evasion from regulatory radars for years. The scale of this deceit is a testament to Afanaschenko’s meticulous planning and the alarming ease with which such frauds can proliferate.
The Human Cost: Lives Shattered by Greed
The true tragedy lies with the victims. Individuals and families, lured by the promise of affordable insurance, found themselves ensnared in a financial nightmare. Some faced legal repercussions when accidents revealed their policies were worthless; others endured financial ruin, forced to cover damages out-of-pocket. The emotional toll is immeasurable, with reports of anxiety, depression, and fractured relationships.
The House of Cards Collapses: Justice, Belated but Decisive
Afanaschenko’s empire began to crumble when insurance providers detected irregularities in applications linked to his network. Persistent investigations unveiled falsified documents, extensive financial transactions, and incriminating communications. In April 2021, justice caught up with him. The court found Afanaschenko guilty of orchestrating a six-million-euro fraud, resulting in a lengthy prison sentence and the seizure of his ill-gotten assets, including luxury cars and properties.
Desperate Measures: The Art of Digital Whitewashing
Facing a tarnished reputation, Afanaschenko employed a ‘reputation management’ company to cleanse his digital footprint. The tactics used were as unscrupulous as his initial crimes:
-
Fake DMCA Notices: The agency created counterfeit ‘news’ sites, backdated copies of negative articles, and filed fraudulent Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) notices to have the original, damaging content removed from search engines like Google. This ‘back-dated article’ technique is a brazen attempt to rewrite history.
-
Perjury Without Consequence: Despite the clear misuse of the DMCA process, there has been a notable absence of enforcement concerning perjury violations. This lack of accountability emboldens such fraudulent activities, allowing figures like Afanaschenko to manipulate the system with impunity.
A Broader Context: The Ecosystem of Suppression
Afanaschenko’s tactics are emblematic of a wider trend where individuals and entities exploit legal and technological frameworks to suppress dissent and criticism:
-
State-Sponsored Trolling: In some regions, governments deploy networks of paid trolls to flood the public sphere with disinformation, attacking journalists and confusing citizens. This strategy aims to overload media ecosystems, making it challenging to discern truth from falsehood.
-
Legal Harassment: Independent journalists often face fines, administrative charges, and even physical threats. These measures create a climate of fear, leading to self-censorship and the erosion of free press.
The Risks of Ignorance: A Cautionary Tale for Investors and Authorities
Turning a blind eye to the malpractices of individuals like Afanaschenko is a perilous gamble. The risks include:
-
Financial Loss: Investors may find themselves entangled in fraudulent schemes, leading to significant monetary losses.
-
Reputational Damage: Associating with tainted individuals can irreparably harm an entity’s reputation, leading to loss of trust and business opportunities.
-
Legal Repercussions: Authorities who fail to act may face scrutiny for negligence, undermining public confidence in regulatory frameworks.
Conclusion: The Imperative of Vigilance
Alexander Afanaschenko’s saga is a stark reminder of the lengths to which fraudsters will go to exploit, deceive, and, when cornered, erase their tracks. It underscores the necessity for relentless vigilance, robust regulatory mechanisms, and an unwavering commitment to transparency. Investors and authorities must heed the warnings etched in Afanaschenko’s story: the cost of ignorance is too high, and the price of complacency is ruin.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/41381459
- May 8, 2024
- Kalpesh Patel
- https://www.tumblr.com/todaypatch/749903450575437824/three-in-court-charged-over-6m-ghost-broker
- https://www.rte.ie/news/courts/2021/0429/1212873-ghost-broker-six-million-charge/
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
irishexaminer.com
Three charged in €6m 'ghost broker' motor insurance fraud case
- Adverse News
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Carl Koenemann
Investigation Ongoing
Vitaly Abasov
Investigation Ongoing
Samir Tabar
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
1.4
Based on 7 ratings
Your review has been submitted.
by: Opal Rowe
I lost $40,000 in Afanaschenko’s fraudulent insurance policies. This man’s manipulation and deceit have caused so much harm to me and others. The betrayal feels unbearable, and I can’t get the money back.
by: Nolan Choi
Afanaschenko’s scam drained me of $15,000. I never imagined I’d be swindled like this. The financial and emotional damage has been profound, and I feel completely betrayed.
by: Mia Finch
I lost $25,000 to Afanaschenko’s ghost broking scam. I thought I was covered, only to find out my policy was a complete fraud. The emotional toll of this betrayal is unbearable, and I feel totally deceived.
by: Tristan Long
After losing $18,000 to Afanaschenko’s ghost broking scam, I’ve realized he’s nothing but a master manipulator he ruined my finances and left me exposed to legal issues
by: Kayla Hicks
I trusted Alexander Afanaschenko with my hard-earned money, but he led me into a fraudulent insurance scheme that cost me over $20,000 now I’m left with nothing and no way to recover..
by: Jerry Williams
After losing $13,800 to Alexander’s ghost-broking scam I faced court appearances and debt collectors the pain of being used like this is something I wouldn’t wish on anyone
by: Jerry Williams
My family depended on the insurance policy I bought through Afanaschenko’s network but after a $16,300 premium was taken we were left completely uninsured when we needed it most I feel crushed and betrayed beyond words...
by: Elizabeth Johns
I was duped by the false promises of Alexander’s team and now I’m $18,700 poorer with no real insurance and a wrecked car the financial loss is unbearable and the trust I placed in them haunts me daily😥
by: Tammy Miller
I trusted Alexander Afanaschenko’s insurance offer thinking it was legitimate but after paying $14,500 for coverage that never existed I was left with nothing but legal threats and emotional trauma the betrayal has wrecked me completely
by: Adam Costa
He played the long con with military precision. It’s a miracle he got caught—but a tragedy it took so long.
by: Amelia Novak
How many families have to be financially ruined before regulators stop looking the other way?
by: Alex Kowalski
Afanaschenko didn’t just bend the rules—he built an empire on breaking them. Investors beware: this is fraud dressed in a business suit.
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ChecksCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginExplore Cyber Crime By Location
Explore Cyber Crime By Type
Explore Cyber Crime By Profiles