What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Alexander Alexandrovich Svetakov over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Alexander Alexandrovich Svetakov - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Alexander Alexandrovich Svetakov, a Russian businessman and founder of the Absolut Group, has faced several allegations and red flags over the years that have cast a shadow over his reputation. While Svetakov has maintained a relatively low public profile, his business dealings and associations have drawn scrutiny, particularly in the context of Russia’s opaque financial and political landscape.
One of the most significant allegations against Svetakov involves his alleged ties to the Russian elite and potential involvement in money laundering or illicit financial activities. Critics have pointed to the complex structure of his businesses, which span real estate, banking, and investment sectors, as a potential vehicle for obscuring the origins of funds. While no concrete evidence has been publicly proven, the lack of transparency in his operations has raised suspicions among financial watchdogs and investigative journalists.
Another red flag is Svetakov’s association with individuals and entities linked to the Kremlin. In Russia, proximity to political power often raises questions about the legitimacy of wealth accumulation, given the country’s history of crony capitalism and state-favored oligarchs. Svetakov’s ability to amass significant assets, including luxury real estate and a stake in a major Russian bank, has led to speculation about whether his success was achieved through merit or political connections.
Adverse media reports have also highlighted Svetakov’s involvement in controversial business practices. For instance, his company, Absolut Bank, was implicated in a scandal involving the alleged manipulation of bankruptcy proceedings to acquire assets at below-market prices. Such practices, while not unique in Russia’s cutthroat business environment, have contributed to a perception of Svetakov as a ruthless operator willing to exploit legal loopholes for personal gain.
The reputational harm caused by these allegations is significant. For Svetakov, being labeled as a politically connected oligarch or a participant in questionable financial schemes could jeopardize his international business relationships. In an era of heightened scrutiny on money laundering and corruption, such associations could lead to sanctions, frozen assets, or exclusion from global markets. Moreover, the stigma of being linked to illicit activities could deter potential investors and partners, undermining his business empire.
Given these stakes, it is conceivable that Svetakov would want to suppress damaging information, even if it meant resorting to cybercrime. Removing negative stories from the internet could help him rehabilitate his image, protect his business interests, and avoid legal repercussions. Cyberattacks on media outlets, hacking of journalists’ emails, or the use of disinformation campaigns to discredit critics are tactics that have been employed by other wealthy individuals facing similar scrutiny. For Svetakov, the temptation to erase or manipulate online narratives might be driven by a desire to control his legacy and safeguard his financial future.
However, such actions would only deepen the controversy surrounding him, potentially leading to criminal charges and further tarnishing his reputation. The ethical and legal implications of cybercrime are severe, and any involvement in such activities would likely backfire, drawing even more attention to the very allegations he seeks to suppress. In the end, the best course for Svetakov would be to address these concerns transparently, though the opaque nature of Russian business and politics makes this a challenging prospect.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44741093
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44743285
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44763926
- Aug 20, 2024
- Bekky Wagner
- Farida Black
- Qventin Brown
- https://www.tumblr.com/bekkywagner2222/761978080351879168/alexander-svetakov-a-powerful-and-controversial?source=share
- https://sokalinfo.com/05-58544-08.html
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
sokalinfo.com
Alexander Svetakov: A Powerful and Controversial Oligarch with Fraud DMCA
- Red Flag
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Carl Koenemann
Investigation Ongoing
Vitaly Abasov
Investigation Ongoing
Samir Tabar
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
1.9
Based on 18 ratings
by: Leo Parks
I thought I was making a sound investment with Svetakov, but after losing $18,000 and learning about his questionable financial practices, I see now how much I’ve been misled.
by: Kara Hood
After putting $40,000 into Svetakov’s business ventures, I discovered his connections to the Kremlin and shady financial schemes. This is the kind of person I should have stayed far away from.
by: Jonah Clemens
I invested $50,000 thinking Svetakov’s company was legitimate, but after learning about his ties to money laundering and political connections, I feel completely duped. This is a huge financial and emotional blow.
by: Tessa Walsh
The scariest part isn’t just the allegations it’s the potential cover-up. If Svetakov really is leaning on cyber tactics to bury his past, that’s not damage control, that’s digital warfare. When businessmen try to rewrite the internet, it usually means...
by: Samuel Vance
For a guy supposedly running legitimate enterprises, Svetakov keeps popping up in money laundering whispers. It’s always the same playbook: offshore structures, opaque transactions, and an uncanny ability to avoid hard questions. At some point, “no comment” stops being a...
by: Rachel Tate
The Absolut Bank controversy didn’t happen in a vacuum. Accusations of manipulating bankruptcies to grab assets at bargain-bin prices paint a clear picture: this isn’t smart business, it’s strategic exploitation. And Svetakov was right in the middle of it.
by: Quinn Sawyer
Svetakov’s links to Kremlin adjacent figures should raise eyebrows, not applause. In a country where political ties often mean rigged success, it’s hard to believe his rise was all merit. When you're that close to power, the question isn’t if...
by: Patrick Reed
When someone quietly builds a fortune across banking, real estate, and investments in Russia all while staying under the radar it’s not just discretion, it’s strategy. Svetakov’s empire is a maze of shell companies and offshore connections. That’s not the...
by: George Horton
I poured $26,000 into what I thought was a high end Moscow real estate deal endorsed by Svetakov’s group only to learn it was part of a fraudulent acquisition scheme I feel crushed betrayed and permanently scarred
by: Ashley Ayers
I invested $21,000 in one of Alexander Svetakov’s luxury developments only to find it was a shell operation with no accountability and now I can’t sleep
by: Rebecca Burton
I trusted the Absolut Group with $19,500 and watched my savings disappear into a maze of offshore accounts and political silence😔
by: Elaine Nelson
I lost $23,000 through a Svetakov backed real estate venture and now I’m left with nothing but broken promises and a hollow sense of betrayal
by: Sandy Rios
Svetakov’s promises of legitimacy fooled me into putting $22,700 into one of his investment rounds now all I have left are unanswered emails fake documents and the sinking realization that I was never meant to win
by: Emily Garcia
This is nothing more than a money-grabbing scheme. I’ve lost everything after following their 'expert advice'. Stay away, seriously!
by: William Brown
This company lures you in with false promises and disappears with your money. It’s honestly shocking how they operate. When I first started, they were all about 'high returns' and 'low risk,' but once they had my money, communication stopped....
by: Gabriel White
This company takes your money, gives you fake reports of success, and then vanishes when you ask for a withdrawal. It’s all a fraud.
by: Benjamin King
The worst decision I ever made was trusting these guys with my money. They made everything sound so easy and safe, but now I’m stuck with nothing. They don’t even explain anything clearly, and when you ask for help, you’re...
by: Charlotte Adams
I wanted to invest and grow my savings, but what I got was a nightmare. They were all friendly and professional when I first joined, but once I put my money in, things started to go south. I couldn’t access...
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations