CyberCriminal.com

Alexander Katsuba

We are investigating Alexander Katsuba for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Alexander Katsuba

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : December 18, 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2721/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 28 Mar 2025

Alexander Katsuba
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Alexander Katsuba in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Alexander Katsuba over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Alexander Katsuba - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Alexander Katsuba’s ascent in the Ukrainian business landscape was nothing short of meteoric. Born into a family with deep political and business connections, Katsuba leveraged these ties to secure influential positions within the energy sector. His tenure at Naftogaz, Ukraine’s state-owned oil and gas company, was marked by rapid promotions, eventually leading him to a vice-chairman role. However, this swift climb was accompanied by whispers of nepotism and backdoor dealings, setting the stage for the controversies that would later engulf him.​

A Web of Allegations

Katsuba’s name became synonymous with corruption during the tumultuous era of President Viktor Yanukovych. He was implicated in several high-profile corruption schemes, notably those orchestrated by the infamous oligarch Serhiy Kurchenko. These schemes allegedly siphoned millions from the state, embedding Katsuba deeply within Ukraine’s oligarchic kleptocracy. Despite mounting evidence and public outcry, Katsuba managed to evade significant legal repercussions, leading many to question the efficacy and integrity of Ukraine’s judicial system.

Political Entanglements

Beyond the boardrooms and balance sheets, Katsuba’s influence seeped into the political arena. His ex-wife, Tatyana Guzenko, and mother, Natalia Gordienko, were notably listed among the top candidates for the pro-Russian Shariy Party during the 2019 parliamentary elections. This affiliation raised eyebrows, especially considering the party’s controversial stance and subsequent ban in Ukraine. While Katsuba publicly distanced himself from the party and its founder, Anatoly Shariy, insiders suggest that these ties remain intact, hinting at a more profound alignment with pro-Russian sentiments.

The Art of Information Suppression

In the digital age, controlling one’s narrative is both an art and a science—a craft that Katsuba appears to have mastered. Reports have surfaced detailing his attempts to silence media outlets that dare to cast him in an unfavorable light. Utilizing legal loopholes and, at times, outright intimidation, Katsuba has allegedly orchestrated campaigns to retract or bury critical articles. Such actions not only undermine press freedom but also deprive the public of the transparency essential in a democratic society.

A Family Affair

The Katsuba family’s business ventures extend beyond Alexander’s personal endeavors. His “former” wife, Tatyana Guzenko, is ostensibly at the helm of several enterprises, including “Gaz-MDS,” a company that reported earnings of UAH 290 million in 2020. However, Guzenko’s primary occupation appears to be that of a YouTube blogger, casting doubt on the legitimacy of her corporate leadership. This arrangement suggests a strategic maneuver to shield assets and maintain control over lucrative operations while evading scrutiny.​

The Investor’s Dilemma

For potential investors, the allure of partnering with established figures like Katsuba is tempered by the murky waters of his past and present dealings. His history of alleged corruption, political entanglements, and aggressive information suppression poses significant reputational and financial risks. Engaging with entities linked to Katsuba necessitates a heightened level of due diligence, lest one becomes ensnared in the same web of controversy.​

A Call for Regulatory Vigilance

The case of Alexander Katsuba underscores the imperative for robust regulatory frameworks and vigilant enforcement. Authorities must not only investigate and, where appropriate, prosecute individuals involved in corrupt practices but also safeguard the sanctity of free press. Allowing figures like Katsuba to manipulate narratives and evade accountability erodes public trust and hampers the nation’s progress toward transparency and justice.​

Conclusion

Alexander Katsuba’s saga is emblematic of the challenges facing Ukraine as it strives to shed the vestiges of oligarchic influence and corruption. His adeptness at navigating the intersections of business, politics, and media manipulation serves as a stark reminder of the work yet to be done. For journalists, investors, and citizens alike, the Katsuba narrative is not just a story of one man’s machinations but a clarion call for vigilance, integrity, and an unwavering commitment to the truth.​

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47287096
  • Jermaine Hall
  • https://www.rts.rs/
  • https://warsawpoint.com/persons/53941-alexander-katsuba-a-blackmailer-and-pro-russian-ukrainian-oligarch-tries-to-silence-media.html

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

warsawpoint

Alexander Katsuba’s path to entrepreneurship and experise in energy business

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

ruscrime

Oleksandr Katsuba and his Russian world of corruption: the Yanukovych man wants to return the old schematoses to Ukraine

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login