CyberCriminal.com

Alpho

We are investigating Alpho for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Alpho

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 24 Apr 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 9010/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 22 Nov 2024

Alpho
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Alpho in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Alpho over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Alpho - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Alpho.com, a forex broker operated by Gulf Brokers Ltd, has been embroiled in a series of controversies and allegations that have significantly tarnished its reputation. These issues range from regulatory concerns and customer complaints to accusations of unethical practices and cybercrime. Below is a detailed breakdown of the major allegations and red flags, along with an analysis of why Alpho might resort to extreme measures, including cybercrime, to suppress this damaging information.

Major Allegations and Red Flags
1. Regulatory Concerns
Alpho is regulated by the Seychelles Financial Services Authority (FSA), a jurisdiction known for its lenient oversight compared to stricter regulators in Europe or the U.S. This has raised questions about the safety of traders’ funds and the credibility of the platform. Critics argue that the lack of robust regulation leaves investors vulnerable to malpractice .

2. Customer Complaints
Numerous users have reported unfair trading practices, including slippage—where trades are delayed or altered to the client’s disadvantage—resulting in significant financial losses. Additionally, traders have accused Alpho of manipulating trading conditions to ensure losses after initial profits, a tactic often associated with fraudulent brokers .

3. Withdrawal Issues
A recurring complaint involves difficulties in withdrawing funds. Clients have reported long delays or outright refusal to release their money, a common red flag in investment scams. This has fueled suspicions that Alpho may be operating as a Ponzi scheme, using new deposits to pay out earlier investors .

4. Shady Marketing Practices
Alpho has been accused of misleading marketing tactics, luring inexperienced traders with promises of high returns while downplaying the risks. Some users claim they were pressured to reinvest after heavy losses, trapping them in a cycle of financial harm .

5. Reputation Management and Cybercrime
Alpho has allegedly employed fake DMCA takedown notices to remove negative content from the internet. These notices, often sent through third-party reputation management agencies, falsely claim copyright infringement to force platforms like Google to delist critical articles. This tactic is part of a broader strategy to suppress allegations of fraud, tax avoidance, and other unethical practices .

Why Alpho Wants These Stories Removed
The allegations against Alpho strike at the core of its business model and reputation. Regulatory concerns and customer complaints undermine trust, a critical factor for any financial institution. If potential investors perceive Alpho as unreliable or fraudulent, the company risks losing its customer base and facing legal scrutiny.

The withdrawal issues and manipulative trading practices are particularly damaging, as they suggest systemic fraud. These stories, if widely publicized, could lead to regulatory investigations, lawsuits, and a collapse of investor confidence.

The use of fake DMCA notices to remove negative content highlights Alpho’s desperation to control its public image. By suppressing critical reviews and investigative reports, Alpho aims to maintain a facade of legitimacy. However, this strategy has backfired, as the exposure of these tactics has further damaged its reputation, associating the company with cybercrime and unethical behavior .

Conclusion
Alpho’s attempts to silence critics through cybercrime and reputation laundering reveal a company willing to go to extreme lengths to protect its image. However, these efforts have only amplified the allegations, painting Alpho as a broker with something to hide. For investors, the red flags are clear: regulatory weaknesses, customer complaints, and unethical practices make Alpho a high-risk platform. As the truth continues to surface, Alpho’s reputation may prove irreparable, serving as a cautionary tale in the world of online trading.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/41084422
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45258729
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45276778
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45279837
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45301634
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45396088
  • Apr 24, 2024
  • Oct 08, 2024
  • Oct 09, 2024
  • Oct 09, 2024
  • Oct 10, 2024
  • Oct 14, 2024
  • Ellie Thomas
  • Janne Nykanen
  • Bo Tukio
  • Fitz Gauthier
  • Juha Kaitala
  • Vick Artois
  • https://www.tumblr.com/intelligencelineg/763942813208576000/caught-in-the-act-alphocoms-failed-plot-to
  • https://www.tumblr.com/complaintboxs/763843527266418688/caught-in-the-act-alphocoms-failed-plot-to
  • https://www.tumblr.com/financescamsh/763771700557004800/caught-in-the-act-alphocoms-failed-plot-to
  • https://www.tumblr.com/24pressnewsblog/743012018459656192/alpho-reviews
  • https://www.tumblr.com/novelnowg/764315697203511296/caught-in-the-act-alphocoms-failed-plot-to
  • https://www.fraudadviser.com/alpho/
  • https://www.wikifx.com/en/comments/list/7041538413.html

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

wikifx.com

Alpho Pro

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

wikifx.com

Alpho - Review

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

fraudadviser.com

Caught in the Act: Alpho.com’s Failed Plot to Silence the Truth – Part 1

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and serves as a researcher at FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Escalate This Case

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert