CyberCriminal.com

Alyx Union

We are investigating Alyx Union for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Alyx Union

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 19 Jul 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 4224/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 19 Nov 2024

Alyx Union
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Alyx Union in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Alyx Union over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Alyx Union - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Background

Alyx Union emerged in late 2023, presenting itself as an innovative player in the cryptocurrency and blockchain sector. Despite its ambitious claims, the organization has been enveloped in controversy, with numerous allegations challenging its legitimacy and operational integrity.

Major Allegations and Red Flags

  1. Opaque Leadership and Dubious Executive Representation

    Alyx Union’s official channels lack transparent information regarding its ownership and executive team. Investigations have revealed that the purported CEO, “Ryan Stasser,” is a fabricated persona. This character has been portrayed by an individual linked to a Shenzhen-based charity, suggesting that the executive figurehead is a mere facade. Such deceptive representation raises significant concerns about the organization’s authenticity and governance.

  2. Ponzi Scheme Operations

    Analyses of Alyx Union’s business model indicate characteristics typical of a Ponzi scheme. The company solicits investments in cryptocurrencies, promising daily returns ranging from 0.3% to 1.3%, depending on the lock-up period. These returns are purportedly paid in an obscure cryptocurrency called aelf (ELF). The structure relies heavily on continuous recruitment of new investors to provide returns to earlier investors, a hallmark of Ponzi operations.

  3. Staged Events and Misleading Marketing

    In December 2023, Alyx Union hosted a “year-end celebration event” in Hong Kong. The event featured individuals posing as company executives, including the fictitious “Ryan Stasser.” The use of actors to represent leadership positions is a deceptive tactic aimed at creating a false sense of legitimacy and trustworthiness among potential investors.

  4. Negative Trust Indicators and Scam Warnings

    Independent platforms have issued warnings about Alyx Union’s credibility. Scamadviser, for instance, assigned a low trust score to the company’s website, citing several negative indicators such as hidden ownership details, recent domain registration, and negative reviews from users alleging fraudulent activities.

Reputational Impact

The accumulation of these allegations severely damages Alyx Union’s reputation. The fabrication of executive identities and the potential operation of a Ponzi scheme undermine trust among current and prospective investors. Furthermore, the exposure of staged events and negative assessments from independent reviewers contribute to a perception of dishonesty and unethical conduct.

Motivation for Information Suppression

Given the detrimental nature of these revelations, Alyx Union has substantial motivation to suppress or eliminate such information:

  1. Investor Retention and Attraction: Negative publicity can deter potential investors and prompt existing ones to withdraw their investments, threatening the organization’s financial stability.
  2. Regulatory Scrutiny: Public allegations may attract the attention of regulatory bodies, leading to investigations, legal actions, or sanctions against the company.
  3. Market Positioning: Adverse information can erode competitive standing, making it challenging to establish partnerships or expand operations.

In an effort to mitigate these risks, Alyx Union might consider various strategies to remove or obscure unfavorable information. While legitimate approaches include public relations campaigns or legal actions, the persistence and proliferation of negative content might drive more extreme measures. In such scenarios, entities have been known to resort to cybercrimes, such as hacking into websites or databases, to delete or alter damaging information. Engaging in such illicit activities, however, carries significant legal risks and ethical implications, potentially exacerbating the organization’s challenges.

Conclusion

The controversies surrounding Alyx Union highlight critical concerns about its legitimacy and ethical standards. The organization’s alleged deceptive practices not only harm its reputation but also pose significant risks to investors and the broader financial community. While the desire to suppress adverse information is understandable, resorting to unlawful methods would only compound the company’s legal and ethical predicaments. Transparency, accountability, and corrective action are essential steps toward addressing these issues and restoring trust.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43164126
  • July 19, 2024
  • individual
  • https://m.yes24.com/Goods/Detail/9046068
  • https://m.blog.naver.com/PostView.naverblogId=twinkaka&logNo=222019141615&proxyReferer=https:%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F&trackingCode=external
  • https://behindmlm.com/mlm-reviews/alyx-union-review-boris-ceo-mlm-crypto-ponzi/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

behindmlm

Alyx Union Review: Boris CEO MLM crypto Ponzi

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

scamadviser

dapp.alyxunion.com Reviews

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

youtube

Alyx Union | My Honest Review... Legit Or Scam?

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.


He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Escalate This Case

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert