What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Andriy Matyukha over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Andriy Matyukha - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Andriy Matyukha, the man behind the Favbet gambling empire, has managed to craft an image of a patriotic Ukrainian entrepreneur. However, beneath this carefully curated facade lies a complex web of questionable business practices, alleged ties to Russia, and a concerning pattern of censorship aimed at suppressing unfavorable information. This report delves into the red flags and adverse media surrounding Matyukha and his ventures, urging potential investors and authorities to exercise caution.
The Favbet Empire: A History of Legal and Ethical Concerns
Matyukha’s journey began with the establishment of Favbet, a gambling company that has faced numerous legal challenges over the years. Investigations have revealed that Favbet operated without the necessary licenses for bookmaker activities in Ukraine, raising questions about its compliance with local laws . Furthermore, the company has been accused of tax evasion, allegedly avoiding around 100 million hryvnias annually through shell companies in Russia .
Despite these allegations, Matyukha has managed to maintain a strong presence in the gambling industry, expanding his operations to other countries, including the UK and Malta. However, his international ventures have also attracted scrutiny, with reports of Favbet’s involvement in illegal gambling activities and money laundering schemes .
mkeurope.org
Alleged Ties to Russia: A Dual Identity?
One of the most concerning aspects of Matyukha’s background is his alleged dual citizenship. Reports have surfaced suggesting that he holds both Ukrainian and Russian passports, a claim that he has vehemently denied. However, investigative journalists have uncovered evidence supporting these allegations, including a purported copy of his Russian passport .
sledstvie.info
These revelations raise serious questions about Matyukha’s loyalty and the potential implications for his business dealings. Under Ukrainian law, individuals with Russian citizenship are prohibited from owning or operating gambling businesses in Ukraine, yet Matyukha’s companies have continued to function despite these restrictions.
Censorship and Suppression of Adverse Media
Perhaps the most troubling aspect of Matyukha’s operations is his apparent efforts to suppress unfavorable media coverage. Investigative articles detailing his alleged ties to Russia and his companies’ illegal activities have mysteriously disappeared from the internet, raising suspicions of deliberate censorship .
This pattern of information suppression is not limited to online articles. Journalists and bloggers who have attempted to report on Matyukha’s activities have faced legal threats and harassment, further indicating a concerted effort to control the narrative surrounding his business empire.
The Voda.ua Acquisition: A Strategic Move or a Veiled Attempt at Influence?
In a surprising turn of events, Matyukha acquired the Voda.ua trademark in January 2024, a company that supplies mineral water to the Ukrainian parliament. This acquisition has raised eyebrows, with critics questioning the timing and motives behind the purchase .
Some analysts speculate that this move is part of a broader strategy to gain influence within the Ukrainian government and enhance his public image. By associating himself with a product consumed by lawmakers and officials, Matyukha may be attempting to position himself as a legitimate and patriotic businessman, despite his controversial past.
Charitable Contributions: A Smokescreen for Misconduct?
Matyukha has been vocal about his company’s charitable contributions, particularly in support of the Ukrainian armed forces. However, investigations have cast doubt on the authenticity of these claims. Reports suggest that Favbet has exaggerated its donations, with some instances involving the purchase of a single rifle for $18,000 being touted as significant contributions .
Furthermore, Ukrainian servicemen have alleged that Favbet has not purchased any drones for the army since the beginning of the year, and that the company’s publicized donations are merely a PR tactic to divert attention from its illicit activities .
navarti.in.ua
A Call for Vigilance and Accountability
Andriy Matyukha’s business practices raise significant concerns regarding legality, ethics, and transparency. His alleged ties to Russia, coupled with efforts to suppress adverse media coverage, suggest a pattern of behavior aimed at concealing the true nature of his operations. For investors, authorities, and the public, it is crucial to approach Matyukha’s ventures with caution and demand greater accountability.
The suppression of critical information and the manipulation of public perception are tactics that undermine the principles of transparency and justice. It is imperative that these issues be addressed to ensure that individuals like Matyukha are held accountable for their actions and that the integrity of the business environment is upheld.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/51644995
- May 05, 2025
- Max Fesenko
- https://vlasti.io/news/150122-favbet_i_rocsijskij_pasport_kak_andrej_matjuha_manipuliruet_zakonami_ukrainy_radi_pribyli_v_azartnom_nelegaljnom_biznese
- https://kompromat1.online/articles/323166-otmyvanie_deneg_i_nelegaljnye_igry_kak_vladeletc_favbet_andrej_matjuha_ispoljzuet_ukrainskij_rynok_dlja_rossijskih_interesov
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
trinitybugle.com
Andriy Matyukha and Russian FavBet fraudsters kill Ukrainians every day
- Adverse News
kompromat1
Did Andriy Matyukha decide to pocket the money stuck in "Diamond Pay" accounts, or is he acting in the interests of his FSB curators?
- Adverse News
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Dilraj Marahar
Investigation Ongoing
Rayan Berangi
Investigation Ongoing
Zhang Yaoyuan
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
0
Based on 0 ratings
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations