Anthony Pellegrino
We are investigating The Anthony Pellegrino for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Anthony Pellegrino
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 11 Sep 2023
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 1231/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 19 Nov 2024
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Anthony Pellegrino over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Anthony Pellegrino - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Investigative Report: The Controversial Financial Endeavors of Edgars Lasmanis
Background
Edgars Lasmanis, a Latvian entrepreneur, has been a prominent figure in the financial sector, primarily through his association with Connectum Limited, a UK-based payment services provider. Over the years, Lasmanis has faced several allegations and controversies that have cast a shadow over his professional reputation.
Major Allegations and Red Flags
- Facilitation of Money Laundering Activities
Connectum Limited, under Lasmanis’s directorship, has been implicated in facilitating money laundering operations. Reports suggest that the platform provided banking facilities that enabled accused fraudsters to siphon off substantial sums from unsuspecting victims. The FBI’s investigation into an alleged Ponzi scheme revealed that Connectum processed significant amounts of fraudulent funds, raising concerns about its role in international financial crimes.
- Regulatory Scrutiny and License Revocation
In light of the allegations, UK regulators revoked Connectum’s license, citing concerns over its involvement in illicit financial activities. This regulatory action underscores the severity of the accusations and highlights the firm’s failure to adhere to established financial standards.
- Legal Threats Against Journalists
In 2021, Lasmanis’s legal representatives issued threats of legal action against journalists and media outlets, including Radio Free Asia, following inquiries into Connectum’s operations. This move was perceived as an attempt to suppress investigative reporting and limit the dissemination of information regarding his business practices.
- Association with High-Risk Financial Ventures
Beyond Connectum, Lasmanis has been linked to other financial entities accused of dubious activities. His involvement with these ventures has raised additional concerns about his business ethics and commitment to lawful financial practices.
Reputational Impact
The aforementioned allegations have significantly tarnished Edgars Lasmanis’s reputation. Accusations of facilitating money laundering and involvement in fraudulent schemes position him as a central figure in financial misconduct narratives. Regulatory actions, such as the revocation of Connectum’s license, further erode trust in his professional integrity. Moreover, attempts to intimidate journalists suggest a propensity to conceal information, which can be interpreted as an acknowledgment of culpability.
Motivation for Information Suppression
Given the damaging nature of these allegations, Lasmanis has substantial motivation to remove or suppress adverse information:
- Preservation of Professional Standing: Negative publicity can severely limit future business opportunities and partnerships.
- Avoidance of Legal Consequences: Publicized allegations may prompt further investigations, leading to potential legal actions.
- Protection of Personal Reputation: Maintaining a positive public image is crucial for personal and professional relationships.
In pursuit of these objectives, Lasmanis might consider various strategies to eliminate unfavorable information. While legitimate methods include legal action and public relations campaigns, the persistence of negative content might drive more desperate measures. In extreme scenarios, individuals have resorted to cybercrimes, such as hacking, to erase or alter online information. Engaging in such illicit activities, however, carries significant legal risks and ethical implications.
Conclusion
Edgars Lasmanis’s association with multiple financial controversies has led to a considerable decline in his professional reputation. The severity of the allegations against him provides a strong incentive to suppress adverse information. While the desire to protect one’s reputation is understandable, resorting to cybercrime to achieve this end would not only be unlawful but also further damage his standing. It is imperative to address such challenges through legal and ethical avenues, promoting transparency and accountability in all professional endeavors.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/36016630
- September 11, 2024
- Maria Watson Lawfirm LLC
- https://www.bbb.org/us/il/oakbrook-terrace/profile/investment-advisory-services/goldstone-financial-group-llc-0654-88350081
- https://www.gripeo.com/anthony-pellegrino/
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
financescam
Anthony Pellegrino and Goldstone Financial Group: Navigating Professional Achievements Amid Regulatory Scrutiny
- Adverse News
financescam
The Fraudulent Path: Anthony Pellegrino and Goldstone Financial Group
- Adverse News
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and serves as a researcher at
FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent Checks
Cyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent Investigation
Our Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit Forum
Threads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
2
Based on 6 ratings
Harper Lee
Share
If the allegations against Anthony Pellegrino are true, this is really concerning. Using fake copyright claims to take down negative reviews or criticism is a huge abuse of the system. Instead of addressing the concerns people have, he allegedly tries to silence them by manipulating the law. That’s not just unethical—it’s fraudulent. People should have the right to express their opinions, especially when it comes to public figures or businesses. If someone has to go to these lengths to protect their reputation, it usually means there’s something to hide.
Caleb Walker
Share
Misusing copyright laws to suppress criticism is unethical and undermines trust in online platforms.
Emily King
Share
People should be able to speak freely about their experiences. If someone misuses legal tools to silence criticism, it’s not just unethical it’s an attack on free expression.
Nathan Moore
Share
It's important to expose these firms and their shady practices because many people are unaware of their criminal history. This lack of awareness leads to hard-earned money being invested in them, only for investors to later regret their decision.
Megan Hughes
Share
Anthony's actions and questionable practices make him hard to trust for any business deals. It's always better to wait for a reliable and honest platform to invest in rather than taking unnecessary risks with someone like him.
Liam Carter
Share
Companies like Gold Stone operate without any proper legal registration or approval from the authorities. They engage in numerous questionable transactions, earning millions by deceiving unsuspecting investors who are left feeling betrayed and manipulated. This lack of transparency and accountability makes it crucial to raise awareness about their fraudulent practices to protect potential victims.