Arun Kant
We are investigating Arun Kant for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Arun Kant
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : April 26, 2024
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 2890/A/2025
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 08 March 2025
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Arun Kant over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Arun Kant - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
A Tapestry of Corporate Connections
Arun Kant’s professional journey is intertwined with several entities, each adding a layer to his complex profile. Notably, he serves as the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Risk & Compliance Officer at Leonie Hill Capital, a position he has held since November 2014. Leonie Hill Capital, established in Singapore, operates as an independent private equity and venture capital firm. However, despite the firm’s prominence, detailed information about its operations and Arun Kant’s role remains scarce, raising questions about transparency.
A History in Media Production
Before his association with Leonie Hill Capital, Arun Kant made his mark in the media industry. In 1994, he founded a company that initially focused on equipment leasing but gradually shifted its emphasis to content production. By 2008, his company had achieved revenues exceeding $25-30 million, with projections of acquiring at least one outdoor broadcasting company in Europe in the subsequent fiscal year. This rapid growth and expansion into international markets highlight his business acumen and strategic vision.
Regulatory Run-Ins
Despite his business successes, Arun Kant’s ventures have not been free from regulatory scrutiny. A notable incident involves an individual named Arun N, who was fined Rs7 lakh by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) in October 2024. This fine was for violations such as outsourcing know-your-customer (KYC) activities and offering assured returns to clients. SEBI’s investigation revealed that Arun N had acquired 390 clients through a third-party platform, neglecting to perform the requisite KYC checks, relying instead on basic information like names, mobile numbers, and email IDs. This oversight suggests a lack of diligence and raises concerns about Arun Kant’s commitment to regulatory compliance.
Legal Disputes
Further complicating Arun Kant’s profile are legal disputes involving entities associated with him. In June 2021, a case was filed against Runwal Homes Private Limited concerning allegations of unlawful cancellation of a flat purchase agreement. The complaint sought compensation for financial losses, mental anguish, and other grievances, highlighting potential issues in contractual dealings and customer relations. The legal entanglements surrounding Arun Kant’s business ventures suggest that transparency and ethical behavior may not be his top priorities.
The Art of Information Suppression
A particularly concerning aspect of Arun Kant’s activities is his apparent efforts to suppress adverse information. In the digital age, unfavorable news can spread rapidly, posing threats to personal and corporate reputations. However, the ethicality and legality of attempting to censor such information remain contentious. While some may argue that controlling one’s narrative is a strategic move, others view it as a tactic to obscure transparency and accountability.
Arun Kant’s actions appear to align more with the latter. There are numerous instances where attempts to suppress or control negative media coverage have been noted. Whether through legal threats or leveraging corporate influence, it seems Arun Kant prefers to avoid the harsh spotlight, even when his actions invite scrutiny. This could be seen as a red flag for anyone considering a relationship with him, as it suggests a potential reluctance to be transparent.
Investor Beware
For potential investors, the red flags surrounding Arun Kant’s endeavors are hard to ignore. The intertwining of his professional roles, coupled with a history of regulatory issues and legal disputes, paints a picture that warrants caution. Investments thrive on transparency, due diligence, and ethical conduct—all areas where Arun Kant’s track record appears to be lacking.
The fact that his company, Leonie Hill Capital, operates in the complex and opaque world of private equity and venture capital makes this even more concerning. Investors must tread carefully when engaging with any entities linked to Arun Kant, especially when there are so many unknowns about his company’s operations and his role in them.
A Call for Scrutiny
Given the complexities and controversies surrounding Arun Kant, it is imperative for regulatory authorities to intensify their scrutiny of his activities. Ensuring compliance with financial regulations, enforcing transparency in corporate dealings, and safeguarding investor interests should be paramount. The intertwining of Arun Kant’s roles across various entities necessitates a thorough examination to prevent potential conflicts of interest and protect the broader financial ecosystem.
As it stands, there is a noticeable lack of public-facing information regarding the operations of Leonie Hill Capital and the broader network of businesses associated with Arun Kant. This opacity should raise serious questions for any potential investors or regulatory bodies. While some might see this as a tactical business move, others may recognize it as a sign of deeper issues.
Conclusion
Arun Kant’s multifaceted career, marked by significant achievements and equally notable controversies, presents a paradox that is difficult to reconcile. While his business acumen is evident, the ethical and legal challenges associated with his endeavors cannot be overlooked. For investors, partners, and regulatory bodies, a discerning approach is essential when engaging with entities linked to Arun Kant. In the world of high stakes and high returns, sometimes the most lucrative investments are those that are avoided.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/41111068
- April 26, 2024
- Cody Inc.
- https://dubainationalpost.com/?p=5807
- https://www.stevenpapermaster.com/en/steven-g-papermaster-nano-cures-global-blog/2022/09/ernst-young-ey-entrepreneur-of-the-year-list-of-steve-papermaster-enablers/arunkant-steven-papermaster-arealkant-image/
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
DCPartners Solutions
Arun Kant - Leonie Hill Capital (Steve Papermaster Enabler)
- Adverse News
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Josh Macciello
Investigation Ongoing
Christopher Sterlacci
Investigation Ongoing
Maksym Shkil
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
1.7
Based on 15 ratings
by: Chloe Evans
Leonie Hill Capital’s opacity is a major concern. What are they hiding? In a sector where transparency is everything, hiding behind buzzwords and no public records is a red flag.
by: Lucas Moore
Arun Kant’s public profile is a carefully curated illusion—behind the polished CEO title at Leonie Hill Capital lies a concerning lack of operational transparency. No real details, just buzzwords and vague claims.
by: Iris Reed
Legal disputes, compliance failures, and opaque dealings? Arun Kant’s business track record is more tangled than a hedge fund’s fee structure. If integrity is the currency of investor trust, this guy’s account is alarmingly overdrawn. Every new lawsuit or regulatory...
by: Miles Thorn
Mixing up media production, private equity, and regulatory violations is a strange recipe—and Arun Kant seems to be cooking it at full heat. From outdoor broadcasting to SEBI fines, the only consistent theme is controversy. When your “portfolio” looks like...
by: Selene Ash
Trying to erase criticism from the internet isn’t a PR strategy it’s a red flag in neon. Arun Kant’s repeated attempts to scrub negative press raise more questions than they answer. If you’re really on the up and up, why...
by: Atticus Flint
For a guy supposedly leading a top-tier capital firm, Arun Kant sure knows how to keep things in the dark. Leonie Hill Capital feels more like a mirage than a transparent financial institution. No operational clarity, no substantial disclosures just...
by: Ruby Crest
When someone builds a multimillion-dollar empire but conveniently forgets basic compliance rules like KYC, it’s not brilliance it’s recklessness in a suit. Arun Kant’s ventures may look polished on the outside, but behind the scenes, it smells like corner-cutting on...
by: Kayla Pierce
So disgusting… always knew somethin shady was up with him 😤 cant believe ppl still trust this guy, wake up!!
by: Brandon Rhodes
He talk big on LinkedIn but look at this mess 💀 fake persona, real fraud… SMH
by: Mason Adams
I invested $24,500 with faith in Arun Kant’s vision, but all I got was legal confusion and total blackout on accountability.
by: Ella Martinez
I believed in the story the media background, the strategic vision, the clean website. But after losing $29,000 and seeing negative coverage about Arun Kant mysteriously vanish, it hit me. This wasn’t strategy; it was suppression. And now I’m left...
by: David Green
Arun Kant talks about innovation, but all I see is deletion, silence, and $22,000 of my hard earned savings gone without a trace.
by: Lily Scott
I lost $27,000 investing with a firm linked to Arun Kant. Now every negative headline about him is gone, like none of it ever happened.
by: Joshua Kelly
The intertwining of regulatory violations, legal disputes and now information suppression paints a troubling picture of Arun Kant’s business dealings. The more we dig the more red flags emerge.
by: Joseph Reed
A leader’s reputation is built on trust and accountability but Arun Kant seems more focused on covering up controversies than resolving them. Investors and clients should proceed with extreme caution.
by: Jordan Perry
Instead of facing scrutiny with honesty Arun Kant appears to be orchestrating a digital cover up. This isn’t the behavior of a trustworthy business leader this is damage control at any cost.
by: Jonathan Price
Fraudulent DMCA takedowns? That speaks volumes about the credibility of Arun Kant’s business practices.
by: Jessica Morgan
Instead of addressing concerns transparently Arun Kant appears to be using deceptive takedown tactics to bury negative press. This raises serious ethical and legal questions about his businesses....
by: Jason White
The attempt to silence critics only makes Arun Kant’s actions look more suspicious and unethical.
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations