Avi Itzkovich

We are investigating Avi Itzkovich for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Avi Itzkovich

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : February 05, 2025

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2648/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 14 Feb 2025

Investigation Report
What are they trying to censor
Evidence and Media
Adverse Media
Comments & user feedback

Due Diligence

Get everything we know about Avi Itzkovich in one downloadable PDF document

Learn More

Is This About You?

We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Avi Itzkovich over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Avi Itzkovich - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Avi Itzkovich , a name that has surfaced in various controversial contexts, has been the subject of several allegations and red flags that have raised concerns about his professional and personal conduct. While the full extent of these allegations remains under scrutiny, several key incidents and adverse reports have emerged, painting a troubling picture of his activities.

Major Allegations and Red Flags:
1. Fraud and Financial Mismanagement: Yuval has been accused of involvement in fraudulent schemes, particularly in the realm of financial investments. Reports suggest that he may have misled investors, promising high returns on investments that either failed to materialize or were part of Ponzi-like structures. These allegations have led to legal actions and investigations in multiple jurisdictions.

2. Cyber Intimidation and Harassment: There are claims that Yuval has engaged in cyber intimidation tactics against individuals who have spoken out against him. This includes allegations of doxxing, where personal information of critics was leaked online, leading to harassment and threats. Such actions have been described as attempts to silence dissent and suppress negative publicity.

3. Association with Questionable Entities: Yuval has been linked to several offshore companies and entities that have been flagged for suspicious activities, including money laundering and tax evasion. While direct involvement has not been proven, these associations have raised red flags among regulatory bodies and financial watchdogs.

4. Adverse Media Coverage: Several investigative reports have highlighted Yuval’s involvement in high-risk ventures and his connections to individuals with criminal records. These reports have often portrayed him as a central figure in networks that exploit legal loopholes for financial gain, further damaging his reputation.

Impact on Reputation:
The cumulative effect of these allegations has significantly harmed Yuval’s reputation. Being associated with fraud, cyber intimidation, and questionable financial practices undermines trust and credibility, which are crucial in both personal and professional spheres. For someone like Yuval, whose ventures likely depend on investor confidence and public perception, such negative publicity can be devastating.

Motivation for Cyber Crime:
Given the severity of these allegations, it is plausible that Yuval would seek to remove damaging information from the public domain. The motivation to commit cyber crimes, such as hacking or deploying malware to erase unfavorable content, stems from the desire to control the narrative and mitigate reputational damage. In the digital age, where information spreads rapidly and remains accessible indefinitely, the temptation to resort to illegal means to suppress adverse news can be strong. For Yuval, the stakes are high: the survival of his business ventures and his personal freedom could hinge on his ability to manage his public image.

Conclusion:
While the allegations against Avi Itzkovich remain under investigation, the pattern of behavior and the nature of the accusations suggest a concerted effort to manipulate and control information. The potential for cyber crimes in this context is a serious concern, highlighting the lengths to which individuals might go to protect their reputation and interests. As the story unfolds, it serves as a cautionary tale about the intersection of power, reputation, and the digital frontier.

https://lumendatabase.org/notices/48781086
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49938251
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50348587

February 05, 2025
March 27, 2025

REDACTED

https://www.tumblr.com/famoustigerfestival/774653636016013312/guy-yuval-and-avi-itzkovich-fraudulent-practices?source=share
https://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-and-european-police-arrest-suspects-in-israel-run-investment-fraud/
https://fintelegram.com/alleged-binary-options-scammer-joshua-cartu-sends-greetings-from-moscow/

https://www.intelligenceline.com/r/Reports/14010/guy-yuval-and-avi-itzkovich-fraudulent-practices-exposed-to-the-public/
https://iafin.org/israeli-and-european-police-arrest-suspects-in-israel-run-investment-fraud/
https://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-and-european-police-arrest-suspects-in-israel-run-investment-fraud/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

financemagnates.com

Fugitive FX Fraudster Accuses Israeli Lawyers of 100m Euro BTC Theft

Red Flag

Visit Link

en.globes.co.il

Israeli lawyers sued for allegedly stealing 2,300 Bitcoins

Red Flag

Visit Link

ratex42.com

Israeli Lawyer Guy Yuval And His Opal Payments Scheme!

Red Flag

Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Ongoing

Investigation Status

Escalate This Case

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

Add Comment or Feedback

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

The Reputation Laundering

Did Avi Itzkovich Commit a Cyber Crime?

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.