CyberCriminal.com

Baron Luigi Louis Forino

We are investigating Baron Luigi Louis Forino for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Baron Luigi Louis Forino

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 18 March 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 7511/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 17 Mar 2025

Baron Luigi Louis Forino
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Baron Luigi Louis Forino in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Baron Luigi Louis Forino over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Baron Luigi Louis Forino - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Baron Luigi Louis Forino—a name that, at first glance, exudes nobility and prestige. Yet, beneath this veneer lies a labyrinth of deceit, fraud, and a relentless pursuit to sanitize his digital footprint. As an investigative journalist, I’ve delved into the murky waters surrounding Forino, unearthing a narrative that potential investors and authorities cannot afford to ignore.

The Illustrious Persona

Forino has meticulously crafted an image of affluence and influence. He presents himself as a Knight of Malta, a Templar of England, the CEO of the Chinese conglomerate MCC, and, quite impressively, the 190th richest individual globally. Such credentials, if genuine, would indeed command respect and trust. However, a closer examination reveals a stark contrast between this persona and reality.

A Trail of Fraudulent Endeavors

Reports indicate that Forino’s alleged fraudulent activities span decades, leaving a swath of victims across Italy and beyond. These schemes range from financial fraud to dubious political dealings, positioning himself as a gatekeeper of influence.

One particularly revealing account involves Dean Bowman, who had a severe encounter with Forino, referring to him in less-than-flattering terms. Such firsthand experiences shed light on the personal toll of Forino’s alleged schemes.

The Art of Digital Concealment

In today’s digital age, one’s online presence is a testament to their reputation. Forino appears acutely aware of this, employing aggressive tactics to expunge unfavorable content. His methods include:

  1. Abuse of Copyright Takedown Notices: Investigations suggest that Forino has attempted to conceal critical reviews and adverse news by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. Such actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations, including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

  2. Creation of Counterfeit Websites: To bolster his takedown requests, Forino’s associates have allegedly established fake news sites that mimic legitimate outlets. These sites publish backdated articles, creating the illusion that original content is infringing, thereby manipulating legal processes to suppress unfavorable information.

The Ethical and Legal Quagmire

Forino’s endeavors to sanitize his online reputation are not merely unethical; they potentially breach legal boundaries:

  • Perjury: Filing false copyright claims under penalty of perjury is a criminal offense, undermining the integrity of legal frameworks designed to protect intellectual property.

  • Fraud and Impersonation: Crafting counterfeit websites to impersonate legitimate news outlets constitutes fraud and deception, further eroding trust in digital information.

  • Suppression of Free Speech: By targeting legitimate journalistic content, Forino’s tactics infringe upon the principles of free speech and the public’s right to be informed.

Implications for Investors and Authorities

For potential investors, the revelations surrounding Forino serve as a stark warning. Investing in entities associated with individuals who engage in such deceptive practices carries inherent risks, both financial and reputational. Due diligence must extend beyond surface-level information, probing deeper into the ethical conduct and historical behavior of key figures.

Regulatory authorities must also take decisive action:

  • Investigate and Prosecute: Thorough investigations into Forino’s activities should be conducted, with prosecutions pursued where legal violations are evident.

  • Reform Legal Processes: The abuse of copyright takedown systems necessitates reform, including stricter verification processes and penalties for fraudulent claims.

  • Enhance Transparency: Search engines and online platforms should increase transparency regarding content removal requests, allowing the public to be informed about potential abuses.

Conclusion

Baron Luigi Louis Forino’s meticulously curated image is a facade, concealing a history rife with fraud, deception, and aggressive censorship. His actions highlight the vulnerabilities within our digital and legal systems, emphasizing the need for vigilance among investors and proactive measures by authorities. As we navigate an era where information is both a tool and a weapon, Forino’s story serves as a cautionary tale of how appearances can be deceiving and the imperative to seek truth beyond the surface.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40205706
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40205706
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39858275
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39981816
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40157373
  • Mar 18, 2024
  • March 18, 2024
  • March 02, 2024
  • March 7, 2024
  • March 16, 2024
  • David James Corp
  • David James Corp
  • Liam James Corp
  • Liam James Corp
  • Liam James Corp
  • https://www.cultnews101.com/2022/02/just-love-bhakti-margas-guru-and-his.html
  • https://www.cultnews101.com/2022/02/just-love-bhakti-margas-guru-and-his.html
  • https://www.khou.com/article/news/man-charged-with-dallas-officers-murder/285-342969389
  • https://law.justia.com/cases/texas/fifth-court-of-appeals/2014/05-13-00964-cr.html
  • https://www.wbrc.com/story/26082519/witnesses-testified-they-never-saw-one-of-the-ensleyquintuple-homicide-suspects/
  • https://mazzetta.wordpress.com/2017/03/16/la-toto-truffa-italiana-ai-nemici-di-trump/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login