Bijan Burnard

We are investigating Bijan Burnard for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Bijan Burnard

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 05 Nov 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 5421/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 08 Mar 2025

Investigation Report
What are they trying to censor
Evidence and Media
Adverse Media
Comments & user feedback

Due Diligence

Get everything we know about Bijan Burnard in one downloadable PDF document

Learn More

Is This About You?

We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Bijan Burnard over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Bijan Burnard - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Bijan Burnard presents himself as a visionary in the blockchain space, spearheading Lattice Labs with grand claims of innovation. However, beneath the polished image lies a more complex story—one marked by legal disputes, meticulous reputation management, and a suspiciously curated online presence. From a public altercation with British tycoon James Stunt to an overwhelming flood of self-promotional content, Burnard seems determined to control the narrative surrounding his ventures. For investors and regulatory bodies alike, this raises crucial red flags. Is he a true pioneer, or just another name in the growing list of tech figures mastering the art of deception?

The Rise of Bijan Burnard

Bijan Burnard positions himself as a trailblazer in the blockchain industry. His LinkedIn profile paints the picture of a voracious reader, avid traveler, and loving father. His professional journey is highlighted by his leadership at Lattice Labs, which he touts as a premier blockchain laboratory aiming to bridge the gap between Web2 and Web3 technologies.

Under Burnard’s leadership, Lattice Labs has made bold claims about revolutionizing data management through decentralized solutions. A Forbes Georgia article lauds his efforts in transforming the perception of blockchain across Europe’s business and institutional sectors, emphasizing practical applications over the speculative nature of cryptocurrencies.

A Glimpse into Lattice Labs

Lattice Labs, under Burnard’s stewardship, has positioned itself as a significant player in the blockchain arena. The company claims to assist clients in scaling within the Web3 space, offering solutions that integrate artificial intelligence to enhance blockchain protocols.

The company’s mission, as articulated by Burnard, is to stimulate cutting-edge innovation and foster collaboration, making it a destination of choice for top digital talent.

The Shadows Lurking Behind the Spotlight

However, not all that glitters is gold. A deeper dive reveals a more complex narrative. In 2020, Burnard found himself entangled in a legal dispute with British tycoon James Stunt. According to reports, Stunt allegedly assaulted Burnard and was accused of harassment by posting several messages, photographs, and videos of Burnard on social media. While Burnard was the victim in this scenario, the public nature of the dispute raised eyebrows and cast a shadow over his professional image.

The Art of Image Management

In today’s digital age, controlling one’s narrative is paramount, and Burnard appears to be acutely aware of this. An official fan page on Medium, curiously curated by “Official Bijan Burnard Fan Page,” showcases articles that paint him in a favorable light. While it’s not uncommon for public figures to have fan pages, the content’s tone suggests a concerted effort to manage his online persona.

Moreover, Burnard maintains a personal Medium account where he shares insights into blockchain technology and its future. This platform allows him to position himself as a thought leader, further controlling the narrative surrounding his professional endeavors.

The Subtle Dance of Censorship

While there’s no overt evidence of Burnard actively censoring adverse information, the meticulous curation of his online presence suggests a proactive approach to reputation management. By flooding the digital space with positive narratives and controlling the content associated with his name, any potential negative press is effectively overshadowed.

This strategy, while not unique to Burnard, raises questions about transparency. In an industry that champions decentralization and openness, such controlled narratives can be seen as contradictory. Potential investors and partners might wonder: What lies beneath the polished exterior?

The Investor’s Dilemma

For potential investors, due diligence is paramount. The blockchain industry, still in its relative infancy, is rife with both opportunity and risk. While Burnard’s Lattice Labs presents itself as a beacon of innovation, the surrounding controversies and the meticulous image management warrant a cautious approach.

Investors should consider the following:

Conduct Independent Research: Relying solely on curated content can lead to a skewed perception. Seek out independent reviews, testimonials, and third-party analyses of Lattice Labs and Burnard’s ventures.
Assess Legal Histories: While the altercation with James Stunt positions Burnard as the victim, understanding the context and any underlying issues can provide insights into potential risks.
Evaluate Transparency: A company that truly believes in decentralization and openness should reflect those values in its operations and communications. Scrutinize Lattice Labs’ business practices for alignment with these principles.

A Call to Regulatory Bodies

The onus isn’t solely on investors. Regulatory bodies must also play their part in ensuring that emerging industries like blockchain operate within ethical and legal boundaries. The lack of overt adverse media doesn’t necessarily equate to an unblemished record. It’s essential to look beyond the surface and investigate the mechanisms employed by individuals and companies to manage their public personas.

Conclusion

Bijan Burnard is a figure who embodies the duality of modern entrepreneurship: visionary innovation intertwined with meticulous image management. While his contributions to the blockchain industry are noteworthy, the surrounding controversies and the artful curation of his public image suggest a narrative crafted as much by design as by achievement.

https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45992685
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50384211
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50384115

05 November 2024
28 March 2025
28 March 2025

Bilora LLC
Jonn Elton
Jonn Elton

https://www.kentucky.com/news/local/crime/article44508396.html
https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/casedetail.aspx?caseid=4691
https://americanbazaaronline.com/2012/12/20/mystery-unresolved-after-venture-capitalists-murder/

https://www.offshoremonitor.com/intel/5160-bijan-burnard/
https://www.financescam.com/2025/03/19/bijan-burnard-the-master-scammer/
https://www.intelligenceline.com/profile/bijan-burnard/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

Instagram @criticalintel

Bijan Burnard & VXL Dollar – Crypto Scam Exposed? 🚨

Adverse News

Visit Link

IntelligenceLine

Bijan Burnard – VXL Dollar Crypto Scam Investigation

Red Flag

Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Ongoing

Investigation Status

Escalate This Case

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

Add Comment or Feedback

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

The Reputation Laundering

Did Bijan Burnard Commit a Cyber Crime?

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.