CyberCriminal.com

BITStorage

We are investigating BITStorage for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : BITStorage

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 11 Sep 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 0608/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 19 Nov 2024

BITStorage
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about BITStorage in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into BITStorage over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that BITStorage - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

BITStorage, a prominent player in the digital storage and financial services sector, has recently come under scrutiny due to several allegations and red flags that threaten its reputation.

Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities

The company’s reliance on digital infrastructure has exposed it to significant cybersecurity risks. Reports indicate that BITStorage has faced multiple cyberattacks, including ransomware and phishing incidents, leading to unauthorized access to sensitive data. These breaches not only compromise client information but also raise concerns about the company’s ability to safeguard its systems against future threats. The potential for data loss or misuse could erode customer trust and attract regulatory penalties.

BITStorage’s operations across various jurisdictions have highlighted challenges in adhering to diverse legal and regulatory frameworks. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has expressed concerns regarding big tech companies’ roles in financial services, emphasizing issues related to operational risks and cybersecurity. While not named explicitly, companies like BITStorage fall under this scrutiny, suggesting potential regulatory challenges ahead.

Significant disruptions in BITStorage’s information technology systems have adversely affected its business operations. Clients have reported issues such as system downtimes and transaction processing errors, leading to financial losses and dissatisfaction. These operational hiccups not only tarnish the company’s image but also raise questions about its technological robustness and commitment to service reliability.

Reputational Risks

The cumulative effect of cybersecurity breaches, regulatory scrutiny, and operational disruptions has significantly harmed BITStorage’s reputation. Negative media coverage and adverse public opinion have led to a decline in customer confidence and market share. The company’s association with potential regulatory violations and its perceived inability to manage operational risks effectively have further exacerbated the situation.

Given these challenges, BITStorage has a vested interest in removing or suppressing these adverse reports to restore its public image. Negative information can deter potential clients, investors, and partners, leading to financial losses and hindering business growth. In extreme scenarios, a company might contemplate unethical measures, including cybercrimes like hacking or deploying denial-of-service attacks, to eliminate unfavorable content. Such actions, however, carry significant legal risks and ethical implications, potentially causing more harm than the original adverse reports.

In conclusion, while BITStorage faces substantial challenges that threaten its reputation and operational viability, resorting to cybercrime to address these issues would be both illegal and unethical. The company would be better served by enhancing its cybersecurity measures, ensuring regulatory compliance, and improving operational reliability to rebuild trust and credibility in the market.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44531886
  • Sep 11, 2024
  • Muhammad Harris
  • https://scambrokersreviews.com/crypto-scams/bitstorage-review-how-unlawful-exchanges-handle-your-funds/
  • https://finrecoveryinc.org/bitstorage-review-offshore-exchange-with-poor-service/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

trustpilot.com

Fake transactions

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

cer.live

the exchange is partly certified without approved penetration test

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

scamadviser.com

unsure if the website is legit

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login