
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Blake Finance Ltd over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Blake Finance Ltd - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor
Blake Finance Ltd, a financial services company, has faced several allegations and red flags that have raised concerns about its operations and reputation.
Allegations and Red Flags:
1. Unsubstantiated Promises of High Returns: Blake Finance Ltd has been accused of offering investment opportunities with unusually high returns, a tactic commonly associated with fraudulent schemes. Such promises often lack clear explanations of how returns are generated and may not be backed by tangible assets.
2. Pressure Tactics for Quick Decisions: Reports indicate that the company employs high-pressure sales tactics, urging potential investors to make swift decisions. This approach is typical of scams aiming to exploit individuals’ impulsive decisions without allowing adequate time for research or consideration.
3. Lack of Transparency and Clear Information: Blake Finance Ltd has been criticized for providing vague details about its investment products, making it challenging for investors to understand the underlying assets or mechanisms. This opacity is a significant red flag, as legitimate financial institutions typically offer clear and detailed information about their offerings.
4. Unsolicited Contact and Cold Calling: The company has been reported to initiate unsolicited contact with potential investors, including cold calls and unsolicited emails. Such unsolicited approaches are often characteristic of scams, as reputable firms usually do not engage in aggressive unsolicited marketing.
5. Association with Unregulated Investment Schemes: Blake Finance Ltd has been linked to investment schemes that are not registered with financial regulatory authorities, raising concerns about the legitimacy and safety of the investments offered. Engaging in unregulated schemes can expose investors to significant risks and potential fraud.
Impact on Reputation:
These allegations and red flags have significantly harmed Blake Finance Ltd’s reputation. The association with high-risk and potentially fraudulent investment practices undermines trust among current and potential investors. The lack of transparency and the use of pressure tactics suggest unethical business practices, leading to skepticism and wariness in the market. Furthermore, involvement in unregulated schemes exposes the company to legal and financial risks, which can deter investors and partners.
Potential Motivations for Removal of Negative Information:
Blake Finance Ltd would have a strong incentive to remove such adverse information to restore its credibility and attract legitimate investors. Negative publicity can lead to decreased investor confidence, reduced market share, and potential legal consequences. By eliminating damaging content, the company aims to present a more trustworthy image, thereby mitigating reputational damage and financial losses.
Ethical Considerations:
While the desire to protect one’s reputation is understandable, resorting to cybercrime to remove negative information is both illegal and unethical. Engaging in such activities can lead to severe legal penalties and further damage the company’s reputation. It is imperative for Blake Finance Ltd to address the root causes of the allegations and implement transparent and ethical business practices to rebuild trust and credibility in the long term.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/27079124
- March 25, 2022
- Nettie Towell
- https://nettietowell.blogspot.com/2022/03/blake-finance-ltd.html?m=1
- https://otzyv-club.ru/blake-finance-ltd.html
- https://trustviper.com/review/broker-blake-finance/
- https://www.broker-otzovik.com/lohobroker-blake-finance-ltd-obzor-razvoda-i-otzyvy/
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
























Targeted Content and Red Flags

About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case


Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.


You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Josh Macciello
Investigation Ongoing
Christopher Sterlacci
Investigation Ongoing
Maksym Shkil
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
2.3
Based on 12 ratings
by: Caleb Ryder
I regret ever trusting them with my money. Should’ve done more research.
by: Zoe Sparks
Scammy behavior across the board—terrible rates, hidden fees, and zero transparency.
by: Julia Graham
Hiding negative information only confirms guilt. Instead of fixing core issues, Blake Finance tries to manipulate perception. It’s a cover-up that speaks louder than words.
by: Owen Grant
Blake Finance’s high-return promises are not only unrealistic but suspiciously unexplained. Without clarity on how profits are generated, investors are left in the dark. This isn’t innovation it’s deception dressed up in finance.
by: Samuel Richardson
I really don’t trust them. Too many promises of huge returns with not much to show for it. Just sounds like another scheme to get people’s money. No real transparency, nothing solid to back it up, I wouldn’t risk it."
by: Marek Kowalski
Be very cautious with Blake Finance. They contacted me out of the blue and promised huge returns. They convinced me to make a small deposit, and then everything seemed to go well at first. But when I wanted to withdraw,...
by: Nina Andersen
Lost my money to these frauds. Do not trust them!
by: Elena Petrova
I started with a small deposit of $250 at Blake Finance, and for a while, it seemed like a good opportunity. The profits were small but consistent, so I trusted them and made larger deposits. But when I requested a...
by: Julian Richter
Blake Finance is a complete scam, stay away!
by: Luciana Costa
I got lured into Blake Finance with promises of easy profits, but after I deposited money, things started to go south. At first, they gave me small returns to gain my trust, but soon they asked for more money, claiming...
Pros
Cons
by: Violet Bell
This whole thing smells fishy, too many promises with no real explanations behind 'em. Not buying it!
by: Madeline Griffin
The lack of transparency really stands out. If you can't be clear with your investors about how their money is being managed, it’s a major red flag. If they’re legitimate, they should act like it.
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations