CyberCriminal.com

Blake Finance Ltd

We are investigating Blake Finance Ltd for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Blake Finance Ltd

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 25 Mar 2022

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 4657/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 19 Nov 2024

Blake Finance Ltd
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Blake Finance Ltd in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

We are investigating Blake Finance Ltd for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury

We are investigating Blake Finance Ltd for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury

What are they trying to censor

Blake Finance Ltd, a financial services company, has faced several allegations and red flags that have raised concerns about its operations and reputation.

Allegations and Red Flags:

1. Unsubstantiated Promises of High Returns: Blake Finance Ltd has been accused of offering investment opportunities with unusually high returns, a tactic commonly associated with fraudulent schemes. Such promises often lack clear explanations of how returns are generated and may not be backed by tangible assets.
2. Pressure Tactics for Quick Decisions: Reports indicate that the company employs high-pressure sales tactics, urging potential investors to make swift decisions. This approach is typical of scams aiming to exploit individuals’ impulsive decisions without allowing adequate time for research or consideration.
3. Lack of Transparency and Clear Information: Blake Finance Ltd has been criticized for providing vague details about its investment products, making it challenging for investors to understand the underlying assets or mechanisms. This opacity is a significant red flag, as legitimate financial institutions typically offer clear and detailed information about their offerings.
4. Unsolicited Contact and Cold Calling: The company has been reported to initiate unsolicited contact with potential investors, including cold calls and unsolicited emails. Such unsolicited approaches are often characteristic of scams, as reputable firms usually do not engage in aggressive unsolicited marketing.
5. Association with Unregulated Investment Schemes: Blake Finance Ltd has been linked to investment schemes that are not registered with financial regulatory authorities, raising concerns about the legitimacy and safety of the investments offered. Engaging in unregulated schemes can expose investors to significant risks and potential fraud.

Impact on Reputation:

These allegations and red flags have significantly harmed Blake Finance Ltd’s reputation. The association with high-risk and potentially fraudulent investment practices undermines trust among current and potential investors. The lack of transparency and the use of pressure tactics suggest unethical business practices, leading to skepticism and wariness in the market. Furthermore, involvement in unregulated schemes exposes the company to legal and financial risks, which can deter investors and partners.

Potential Motivations for Removal of Negative Information:

Blake Finance Ltd would have a strong incentive to remove such adverse information to restore its credibility and attract legitimate investors. Negative publicity can lead to decreased investor confidence, reduced market share, and potential legal consequences. By eliminating damaging content, the company aims to present a more trustworthy image, thereby mitigating reputational damage and financial losses.

Ethical Considerations:

While the desire to protect one’s reputation is understandable, resorting to cybercrime to remove negative information is both illegal and unethical. Engaging in such activities can lead to severe legal penalties and further damage the company’s reputation. It is imperative for Blake Finance Ltd to address the root causes of the allegations and implement transparent and ethical business practices to rebuild trust and credibility in the long term.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/27079124
  • March 25, 2022
  • Nettie Towell
  • https://nettietowell.blogspot.com/2022/03/blake-finance-ltd.html?m=1
  • https://otzyv-club.ru/blake-finance-ltd.html
  • https://trustviper.com/review/broker-blake-finance/
  • https://www.broker-otzovik.com/lohobroker-blake-finance-ltd-obzor-razvoda-i-otzyvy/

Evidence Box

We are investigating Blake Finance Ltd for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.

Targeted Content and Red Flags

earnforex.com

Review of broker "Blake Finance Limited"

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

register.fca.org.uk

No longer authorised

  • Removed
Visit Link

elitetrader.com

Review of the broker Blake Finance Limited

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database

Escalate This Case

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert