CyberCriminal.com

Blockware Solutions LLC

We are investigating Blockware Solutions LLC for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Blockware Solutions LLC

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : February 19, 2025

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2494/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 18 Mar 2025

Blockware Solutions LLC
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Blockware Solutions LLC in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Blockware Solutions LLC over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Blockware Solutions LLC - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Blockware Solutions LLC, a company that positions itself as a premier provider of Bitcoin mining equipment and hosting services, has recently come under intense scrutiny due to allegations of misrepresentation, operational incompetence, and attempts to suppress unfavorable information. These allegations have raised significant concerns among potential investors and industry observers alike.

The Faes & Company Lawsuit: Allegations of Deception and Incompetence

In December 2022, London-based Faes & Company filed a lawsuit against Blockware Solutions, alleging breach of contract, negligence, deceptive trade practices, and fraud. The lawsuit centers around a $525,000 agreement for 50 Bitcoin mining rigs and associated hosting services. Faes claims that Blockware misrepresented its hosting capabilities, leading to significant operational issues and financial losses.

According to the complaint, Blockware did not own or operate the necessary facilities to host the miners and lacked reliable power sources, resulting in prolonged downtime and significant revenue losses. Faes estimates damages of at least $250,000.

The lawsuit also alleges that Blockware unilaterally increased its fees for the energy used to operate the miners, attributing the hike to a “drastic increase in energy costs.” This move, coupled with the already unreliable hosting services, exacerbated Faes’ financial losses and further eroded trust in Blockware’s business practices.

Blockware’s Response: Denial and Deflection

In response to the lawsuit, Blockware’s CEO, Mason Jappa, dismissed the allegations as baseless, expressing confidence that the case would be dismissed. He characterized the lawsuit as an attempt by Faes’ CEO, Christian Faes, to coerce a settlement, suggesting that the legal action was motivated by the declining value of the mining rigs. Jappa also indicated that Blockware intended to countersue for defamation.

Implications for Investors and Regulatory Authorities

The allegations against Blockware Solutions serve as a stark warning to potential investors. Investing in companies that engage in deceptive practices, misrepresent their capabilities, and attempt to silence critics poses significant financial risks. Due diligence is not just advisable but essential when considering investments in such entities.

Regulatory authorities should also take note of these allegations. The cryptocurrency mining industry operates with relatively little oversight, making it fertile ground for unscrupulous actors. Investigations into companies like Blockware Solutions are necessary to protect investors and maintain the integrity of the market.

Blockware Solutions LLC: A Case Study in Corporate Malfeasance

The case of Blockware Solutions LLC underscores the importance of vigilance in the rapidly evolving world of cryptocurrency mining. Allegations of misrepresentation, operational failures, and attempts to suppress dissenting voices paint a concerning picture of a company that prioritizes its interests over those of its clients. Investors and authorities alike must approach such entities with caution, demanding transparency, accountability, and adherence to ethical business practices.

In an industry built on the principles of decentralization and openness, there is no place for companies that engage in deception and censorship. It is incumbent upon all stakeholders to ensure that the cryptocurrency space remains a realm of innovation and integrity, free from the shadows cast by bad actors like Blockware Solutions.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49198429
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49190231
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49180784
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49186967
  • February 19, 2025
  • February 19, 2025
  • February 19, 2025
  • February 19, 2025
  • Chola LLC
  • Chola LLC
  • Frank Solutions
  • Chola LLC
  • https://denvergazette.com/colorado-watch/michael-clark-boulder-murder-dna/article_b89530d2-96fe-11ef-ab7f-b7ee72617087.html
  • https://www.latimes.com/world/la-xpm-2012-oct-21-la-na-colorado-danger-20121021-story.html
  • https://www.telegram.com/story/news/local/worcester/2015/09/16/jury-picks-start-thursday-in/33537080007/
  • https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/life-sentence-for-denver-bar-murders-called-a-great-day-for-justice
  • https://unicourt.com/case/pc-db5-casegu9734cb82fb2d-1820119
  • https://www.offshorealert.com/tag/blockware-solutions/
  • https://www.offshorealert.com/faes-company-london-ltd-v-blockware-solutions-llc-complaint-bitcoin-mining-fraud/
  • https://nfthorizon.io/blockware-solutions-is-accused-of-fraud/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

unicourt.com

American Mining Warehouse LLC v. Blockware Solutions LLC

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

thecoinrise.com

Customer Accuses Blockware Solutions of Fraud

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

coindesk.com

Blockware Customer Accuses Bitcoin Mining Firm of Fraud

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login