CyberCriminal.com

Brian Korienek

We are investigating Brian Korienek for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Brian Korienek

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 08 Mar 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 6859/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 19 Nov 2024

Brian Korienek
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Brian Korienek in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Brian Korienek over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Brian Korienek - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Brian Korienek, a financial advisor and founder of Goldstone Financial Group, has faced a series of allegations and adverse news reports that have cast a shadow over his professional reputation and the credibility of his firm. These allegations range from regulatory violations to client disputes, raising serious concerns about his business practices. Below is a summary of the major allegations, red flags, and adverse news associated with Korienek and Goldstone Financial Group, along with an analysis of why he and his firm might seek to suppress this information, potentially resorting to unethical or illegal means.

Major Allegations and Red Flags
Regulatory Violations: Korienek and Goldstone Financial Group have been cited by regulatory bodies, including the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), for violations related to misleading advertising and unsuitable investment recommendations. These violations suggest a pattern of prioritizing profits over client interests, undermining trust in the firm.

Client Complaints and Lawsuits: Multiple clients have filed complaints and lawsuits against Korienek and Goldstone Financial Group, alleging mismanagement of funds, misrepresentation of investment risks, and failure to act in their best interests. Some cases have resulted in settlements, further damaging the firm’s reputation.

High-Pressure Sales Tactics: Former clients and employees have accused Korienek of employing aggressive sales tactics to push high-commission products, often without adequately disclosing the associated risks. These allegations paint a picture of a firm more focused on revenue generation than ethical financial advising.

Questionable Investment Strategies: Goldstone Financial Group has been criticized for promoting complex and high-risk investment products, such as non-traded REITs (Real Estate Investment Trusts), which are often illiquid and unsuitable for conservative investors. These strategies have led to significant financial losses for some clients.

Lack of Transparency: Clients have reported a lack of transparency in fee structures and investment performance, with some alleging hidden fees and undisclosed conflicts of interest. This lack of openness has eroded client trust and raised questions about the firm’s integrity.

Reputation Damage and Motives for Suppression
The allegations against Brian Korienek and Goldstone Financial Group have severely harmed their reputation in the financial services industry. Regulatory violations and client lawsuits suggest a disregard for ethical standards, while high-pressure sales tactics and questionable investment strategies portray the firm as prioritizing profits over client well-being. These issues have likely led to a loss of clients, diminished credibility, and increased scrutiny from regulators.

For Korienek and Goldstone Financial Group, the stakes are high. Negative publicity can result in lost business, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage that is difficult to repair. The desire to remove or suppress damaging stories is driven by the need to protect their image, maintain client trust, and avoid further legal and financial consequences. In extreme cases, this could lead to unethical or illegal actions, such as cybercrimes, to silence critics or erase incriminating information. For example, hacking into websites, deleting negative reviews, or orchestrating disinformation campaigns could be seen as desperate measures to control the narrative.

Conclusion
Brian Korienek and Goldstone Financial Group face a litany of allegations that have significantly tarnished their reputation. From regulatory violations to client disputes, the pattern of misconduct suggests a firm struggling to balance ethical practices with profitability. While the motivations for suppressing negative information are clear—preserving reputation and avoiding accountability—the potential resort to cybercrime underscores the lengths to which individuals and organizations may go to protect their interests.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40192756
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40001676
  • March 8, 2024
  • March 17, 2024
  • sara james corp
  • sara james corp
  • https://www.itv.com/news/anglia/2012-03-28/verdict-in-florida-murder-trial
  • https://vancouversun.com/news/world/indian-teen-girl-gang-raped-and-burnt-alive-with-photos
  • https://www.gripeo.com/brian-korienek/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

gripeo.com

Brian Korienek Engaged in a Scam and Misrepresentation

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

files.brokercheck.finra.org

Brian Korienek

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

reports.adviserinfo.sec.gov

Brian Korienek

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login