CyberCriminal.com

Cathay Construction

We are investigating Cathay Construction
for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Cathay Construction

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 13 July 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 3225/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 02 April 2025

Cathay Construction
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Cathay Construction in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Cathay Construction over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Cathay Construction - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Cathay Construction on the surface, it sounds like a solid, reputable name in the Taiwanese real estate market. Slick marketing, ambitious projects, and an “image” of integrity that they’d probably trademark if they could. But dig a little deeper, and that image begins to crack like the facade of a poorly built luxury condo. As I peeled back the layers of polished press releases and carefully curated media statements, what I found was not just a company with some inconvenient skeletons in its closet—but one that seems disturbingly eager to make sure no one ever finds the key to that closet.

From questionable media practices to a suspicious silence around controversy, Cathay Construction appears more invested in managing its reputation than in addressing the very real concerns raised by watchdogs and consumers alike. It’s the kind of behavior that should give any potential investor pause—unless, of course, you enjoy the thrill of playing financial Russian roulette with a company that might be more focused on optics than ethics.

A Facade of Integrity

Cathay Construction, officially known as Cathay Real Estate Development Co., positions itself as a paragon of professionalism and prudent management. Their official communications are replete with commitments to “integrity, professionalism, and prudent management,” aiming to assure stakeholders of their unwavering dedication to ethical practices . However, when corporate proclamations are too polished, it’s often prudent to question what lies beneath the surface.​

Media Manipulation and Censorship

In the realm of real estate development, transparency is paramount. Yet, Cathay Construction appears to have taken a page from a more clandestine playbook. Reports suggest that certain Taiwanese corporations have engaged in practices aimed at suppressing unfavorable media coverage. While direct evidence implicating Cathay Construction remains elusive, the broader context within Taiwan’s media landscape indicates a troubling trend. For instance, the Committee to Protect Journalists has highlighted instances where media freedom in Taiwan has been undermined, with companies leveraging their influence to stifle dissenting voices .​
Committee to Protect Journalists

Moreover, the pervasive influence of external entities, notably from mainland China, has exacerbated the situation. The China Project reported on tightened regulations affecting internet news services, leading to increased self-censorship among Taiwanese media outlets . Such an environment creates fertile ground for corporations like Cathay Construction to maneuver narratives to their advantage, potentially suppressing adverse reports and controlling the information accessible to the public.​

The Implications for Investors

For potential investors, this orchestrated opacity is more than a mere inconvenience—it’s a glaring red flag. Investing in a company that may engage in information suppression poses significant risks. Transparent and accurate information is the bedrock of sound investment decisions. When a company potentially manipulates media narratives, it obscures the true state of its operations, financial health, and ethical standing.​

Consider this: if a company is willing to go to great lengths to suppress unfavorable news, what else might it be concealing? Financial irregularities? Legal entanglements? A culture that prioritizes image over substance? These are not baseless speculations but legitimate concerns that any prudent investor should contemplate.​

A Call to Regulatory Bodies

The potential manipulation of media by Cathay Construction underscores the urgent need for robust regulatory oversight. Regulatory bodies must ensure that corporations operate with transparency and accountability. This includes scrutinizing attempts to influence media narratives and holding companies accountable for actions that undermine public trust.​

Furthermore, media outlets must uphold their journalistic integrity, resisting external pressures that compromise their independence. The public relies on the media to serve as a watchdog, ensuring that corporations act in the best interests of all stakeholders.​

Conclusion

Cathay Construction’s potential attempts to censor unfavorable information highlight a troubling facet of corporate behavior in Taiwan’s real estate sector. While the company projects an image of integrity and professionalism, the underlying efforts to control media narratives suggest a different reality. For investors, this serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of due diligence and the need to look beyond corporate facades. Regulatory bodies and media organizations must remain vigilant, ensuring that transparency and accountability are not mere buzzwords but foundational principles upheld in practice.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43018779
  • 13 July 2024
  • hansen llc
  • https://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/carlos-ortiz-and-tara-rosado-murdered-in-florida-keys-most-brutal-homicide-in-25-years-9234920
  • https://news.housefun.com.tw/news/%E5%B1%A5%E7%B4%84%E4%BF%9D%E8%AD%89%E5%B0%88%E6%88%B6/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

housefun.com.tw

Well-known developer accused of selling pre-sale homes without setting up a performance guarantee account in accordance with regulations Well-known developer accused of selling pre-sale

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login