Christopher Jessop
We are investigating Christopher Jessop for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Christopher Jessop
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 29 July 2022
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 6534/A/2025
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 02 Apr 2025
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Christopher Jessop over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Christopher Jessop - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Christopher Ian Jessop’s maneuvers to suppress critical information about his ventures are particularly audacious. This report aims to illuminate the red flags associated with Jessop and his affiliated entities, highlighting his attempts to censor unfavorable media coverage. Potential investors and regulatory authorities, consider yourselves warned.
A Web of Directorships: A Closer Look
Jessop’s portfolio boasts positions in various companies, including ABL789 Holdings Ltd., CBTC UK Holdco Ltd., and Quality Pet Care Ltd. While an impressive lineup on paper, a deeper dive reveals a pattern of opaque operations and questionable practices.
ABL789 Holdings Ltd.: This healthcare company, under Jessop’s directorship since March 2020, offers services like cancer prehabilitation and diabetes management programs. However, specifics about their operational efficacy and patient outcomes remain elusive, raising concerns about transparency.
CBTC UK Holdco Ltd.: An investment holding company established in 2019, with Jessop on board since February 2021. The firm’s vague description and lack of clear investment portfolios make one question the legitimacy and intent behind its operations.
Quality Pet Care Ltd.: Managing veterinary clinics and pet healthcare plans sounds noble. Yet, under Jessop’s directorship since March 2019, there is scant information on the quality of care provided, leaving pet owners in the dark.
The Art of Censorship: Silencing Dissent
Jessop’s tactics to muzzle unfavorable press are reminiscent of broader, more sinister global censorship trends. By attempting to erase critical narratives, he not only undermines the public’s right to information but also mirrors the actions of authoritarian regimes that prioritize image over integrity.
Investor Caution: The Writing on the Wall
For those contemplating investments in Jessop’s ventures, the signs couldn’t be clearer:
Opaque Operations: A consistent lack of transparency across his business endeavors.
Censorship Tactics: Active efforts to suppress critical media, indicating potential underlying issues.
Regulatory Scrutiny: The possibility of increased attention from authorities due to questionable practices.
Conclusion:
Christopher Ian Jessop’s pattern of obfuscation and censorship is not just a red flag—it’s a glaring siren. Investors should exercise extreme caution, and regulatory bodies must delve deeper into his operations. In a world where transparency is paramount, Jessop’s actions serve as a stark reminder of the lengths some will go to shield the truth
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/28285278
- Petros Stathis
- https://sugardaddynews.livejournal.com/439.html
- https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/article/Records-released-in-sugar-daddy-extortion-scheme-6519.php
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
issuu.com
Christopher Jessop: The Mastermind Behind the Stephen Dent Extortion Scandal
- Red Flag
ctpost.com
Christopher Jessop: Sugar baby probation violation re-opens extortion case
- Red Flag
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Josh Macciello
Investigation Ongoing
Christopher Sterlacci
Investigation Ongoing
Maksym Shkil
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
1.4
Based on 6 ratings
by: Aisha Musa
The alleged actions, if proven, could set a dangerous precedent for misuse of legal tools to stifle dissent.
by: Alain Niyonkuru
The pattern of obfuscation and suppression raises serious questions about the subject's commitment to honest business practices.
by: Alain Niyonkuru
Such actions erode public trust and suggest a disregard for ethical standards in digital conduct.
by: Santiago Ruiz
Christopher Ian Jessop doesn’t just operate in the shadows he thrives there. His lack of transparency in managing companies like Quality Pet Care and ABL789, coupled with his obsession with silencing negative media, makes him a huge risk for investors....
by: Anya Novak
With a business model built on secrecy and media suppression, Jessop seems to think investors are too distracted to notice the lack of transparency. But it’s hard to ignore when the truth is actively being scrubbed from the surface. The...
by: Omar El-Sayed
When your business portfolio has more holes than Swiss cheese and your go-to strategy is to silence critics, it’s not hard to see why investors might be skeptical. Jessop’s companies lack transparency, and that’s a major red flag for anyone...
by: Isabella Nguyen
If you think business is about transparency and accountability, Jessop’s operations are a crash course in the opposite. No one knows what his companies really do, and his censorship tactics make it clear he’s hiding something. No wonder his ventures...
by: Daniel Weber
Christopher Ian Jessop’s ventures are about as transparent as a brick wall. With companies like ABL789 Holdings and CBTC UK Holdco operating in the shadows, it’s hard to see where the legitimacy ends and the smoke and mirrors begin. His...
by: Jayceon McCarty
I actually had a bad experience with Quality Pet Care vets didn’t explain anything, just handed over a huge bill. Makes sense now reading this.
by: Selene Dillard
This Jessop guy sounds like he’s running a corporate magic trick now you see it, now you don’t. Where’s the transparency?
by: Bennett Fry
Something shady goin’ on here. You don’t try to hide stuff unless you got somethin’ to hide, mate.
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations