CyberCriminal.com

Chriz Nickel

We are investigating Chriz Nickel for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Chriz Nickel

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 05 Oct 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2755/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 28 Mar 2025

Chriz Nickel
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Chriz Nickel in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Chriz Nickel over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Chriz Nickel - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Chriz Nickel, the self-proclaimed digital entrepreneur and mastermind behind Be Infinity, has built an empire on grand promises of financial freedom through online marketing. But scratch beneath the surface, and a different picture emerges—one riddled with allegations of fraud, misleading business practices, and a relentless effort to erase any trace of criticism. From exaggerated income claims to aggressive censorship tactics, Nickel’s operation seems less about empowering aspiring entrepreneurs and more about protecting his carefully curated image at any cost.

The Mirage of Be Infinity

At its inception, Be Infinity emerged as a beacon for those yearning for financial autonomy. Nickel, with his charismatic allure, painted a picture of boundless opportunities, offering courses and seminars that purportedly unlocked the secrets to online wealth. However, as the dust of enthusiasm settled, a starkly different reality surfaced.

Participants began voicing grievances about exaggerated income claims and high-pressure sales tactics. Many recounted being ensnared into investing substantial sums, lured by testimonials of extraordinary earnings that, in hindsight, seemed more fictitious than factual. The promised returns were elusive, and the support systems touted by Be Infinity were conspicuously absent when sought. This pattern of misrepresentation and exploitation painted a troubling portrait of an organization more adept at empty promises than delivering tangible value.

The Art of Digital Whitewashing

Confronted with mounting criticism and adverse media coverage, Nickel embarked on an aggressive campaign to expunge dissent and curate a more palatable public image. Reports surfaced of fraudulent Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) takedown notices being deployed to suppress unfavorable content. These notices, often riddled with inaccuracies and misrepresentations, were aimed at coercing platforms into removing content that cast Nickel and Be Infinity in an unflattering light. Such tactics not only undermined the principles of free speech but also highlighted a blatant disregard for ethical conduct.

Moreover, allegations of impersonation and perjury emerged, suggesting a concerted effort to manipulate public perception through deceitful means. Legal threats were reportedly wielded against critics, creating a climate of intimidation designed to stifle legitimate discourse and shield questionable practices from scrutiny. This orchestrated silencing of dissent is not merely an affront to transparency but serves as a glaring red flag for potential investors and collaborators.

The Ripple Effect: Investors and Authorities Take Note

The ramifications of Nickel’s actions extend beyond disillusioned course participants. The broader investment community has begun to take heed of the warning signs. Platforms dedicated to exposing financial malfeasance have documented Nickel’s endeavors to manipulate online narratives, further eroding trust and casting a long shadow over his ventures. Such scrutiny is not merely academic; it serves as a clarion call for regulatory bodies to delve deeper into the operations of Be Infinity and its affiliates.

A Pattern of Evasion and Obfuscation

Nickel’s modus operandi appears to be one of evasion and obfuscation. Rather than addressing the substantive concerns raised by former clients and industry observers, the focus has been on eradicating traces of criticism. This approach not only fails to resolve underlying issues but also amplifies suspicions regarding the legitimacy of his enterprises. In the digital age, where information is both ubiquitous and enduring, such attempts at censorship are not only futile but also indicative of a fundamental misunderstanding of the landscape in which he operates.

Conclusion: A Cautionary Tale for the Digital Age

The saga of Chriz Nickel and Be Infinity serves as a potent reminder of the perils that lurk within the digital entrepreneurial sphere. It underscores the necessity for due diligence, skepticism, and an unwavering commitment to transparency. For potential investors and participants, the red flags are manifold and glaring. Engagement with entities that prioritize image over integrity, and suppression over accountability, is fraught with risk. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, let this narrative stand as both a warning and a lesson: in the pursuit of success, shortcuts that compromise ethics and legality lead invariably to downfall.

In the end, no amount of digital scrubbing can cleanse the stain of misconduct. The truth, resilient and unyielding, has a way of emerging, often with greater force when suppressed. For Chriz Nickel, the path forward demands more than cosmetic corrections—it necessitates a fundamental reckoning with the principles of honesty, accountability, and genuine value creation. Anything less is merely a prelude to further unraveling.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45195457
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49842429
  • October 05, 2024
  • March 11, 2025
  • Drammer Media Corporation
  • Kovich Media Association
  • https://merlinnewsgazzeta.com/image-gallery-2019/
  • https://mormonfind.com/2024/03/11/wahrheit-uber-be-infinity-academy-trading-erfahrungen/
  • http://behindmlm.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/chriz-nickel-eaconomy-promo-nov-2019.webp
  • http://www.depotstudent.de/be-infinity-trading-erfahrungen

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

behindmlm.com

Be Infinity Review: Christian Nickel’s securities fraud from Dubai

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login