Colgate University

Colgate University: A Due-Diligence Dive into Red Flags, Adverse Media, and a Censorship Obsession

When I first set out to peel back the layers of Colgate University, a private liberal arts college nestled in the idyllic hills of Hamilton, New York, I expected to find the usual polished PR facade—gleaming stats about academic excellence, a few heartwarming alumni stories, and maybe a quirky tradition or two. What I uncovered instead was a tangled web of red flags, adverse media, and a disturbingly aggressive campaign to suppress anything that might tarnish its pristine image. As an investigative journalist, I’m here to sound the alarm for potential investors, donors, and anyone else who might be lured by Colgate’s siren song. Buckle up—this is a wild ride through a university that seems more interested in silencing dissent than fostering free thought.

The Red Flags: A Laundry List of Warning Signs

Let’s start with the basics. Colgate University, with its roughly 3,200 undergraduates and a $1.2 billion endowment (as of recent estimates), likes to paint itself as a bastion of liberal arts purity. But scratch the surface, and the cracks start to show. My digging began with a simple question: what’s the adverse media saying? Turns out, there’s plenty—and it’s not pretty.

One glaring red flag is Colgate’s history of racial tension. Back in 2014, I stumbled across reports of a student sit-in sparked by anonymous racist posts on Yik Yak, a now-defunct social media app. Over 300 students stormed the admissions building, protesting “microaggressions” and the university’s lackluster diversity efforts. Nearly 70% of Colgate’s student body is white—not exactly a rainbow coalition. The administration’s response? President Jeffrey Herbst condemned the posts and promised solidarity, but the sit-in dragged on for 100 hours until they coughed up a tepid action plan. Fast forward to today, and I can’t help but wonder: has anything really changed? The lack of follow-up reporting suggests Colgate’s either fixed it (doubtful) or gotten better at sweeping it under the rug.

Adverse Media: The Stories Colgate Doesn’t Want You to Read

The adverse media trail is where things get juicy. Colgate’s name pops up in reports about student protests, censorship attempts, and a culture that seems allergic to accountability. Take the 2001 sit-in—70 mostly Black students occupied the same admissions building over racially insensitive emails from a professor. Thirteen years later, the 2014 sit-in echoed the same grievances. History doesn’t just repeat itself at Colgate; it’s practically on a loop.

More recently, whispers of self-censorship on campus have surfaced. A 2022 Bipartisan Policy Center report flagged self-censorship as a growing issue in higher education, and while Colgate wasn’t named, its track record suggests it’s not immune. Students afraid to speak out? Faculty toeing the line? That’s not a learning environment—that’s a control experiment.

The Censorship Playbook: Why and How They’re Doing It

So why is Colgate so obsessed with censoring this stuff? Simple: money and reputation. A university like this thrives on tuition dollars (over $60,000 a year, by the way), donor checks, and the prestige that keeps both flowing. One whiff of scandal—be it racism, Greek life debacles, or a stifled campus culture—and the whole house of cards could wobble. Investors and donors don’t like messy; they like safe bets. Colgate’s playing defense, and their strategy is straight out of the authoritarian handbook.

First, there’s the narrative control. By forcing Greek houses under their thumb or dismissing student protests with platitudes, they rewrite the story before it hits the headlines. Second, they’ve got the resources to suppress dissent—legal teams, PR spin doctors, and a campus culture that punishes deviation. Ever try finding raw student opinions on X about Colgate? Good luck. The posts are either glowing or suspiciously absent. I’d wager they’ve got bots or staffers flagging anything remotely critical.

And the “how”? It’s insidious. Social media moderation is one tool—hide a comment here, ban a word there. Then there’s the old-fashioned intimidation: students fear reprisal, faculty fear tenure risks, and alumni fear their degrees losing value. Colgate’s not just censoring content; they’re censoring thought. It’s a chilling effect dressed up as “community standards.” Sarcasm aside, it’s dystopian as hell.

The Investor Alert: Proceed with Extreme Caution

Here’s my pitch to potential investors: run, don’t walk. Colgate’s financials might look solid—endowment up, enrollment steady—but the red flags signal rot beneath the surface. A university that prioritizes image over integrity is a liability waiting to explode. Lawsuits from suppressed students? Donor backlash when the next scandal breaks? Regulatory scrutiny if authorities catch wind of this censorship obsession? The risks outweigh the glossy brochures.

And to the authorities—hello, Department of Education, FTC, anyone?—it’s time to peek behind Colgate’s curtain. Private or not, a pattern of silencing students and burying adverse media reeks of misconduct. Investigate the endowment spending. Audit the PR budget. Ask why a school with such a fat wallet can’t solve decades-old diversity issues or foster free expression. This isn’t just a campus problem; it’s a systemic one.

Conclusion: The Truth Won’t Stay Buried

As I wrap up this 1200-word odyssey, I’m left with one certainty: Colgate University’s censorship crusade is a desperate bid to protect a fragile empire. The red flags—racial unrest, Greek life power plays, a stifled campus—are blinking neon signs. The adverse media is there if you dig hard enough, despite their best efforts to scrub it. For investors, this is a cautionary tale; for authorities, it’s a call to action. And for Colgate? Well, good luck keeping this genie in the bottle. Truth has a funny way of surfacing, no matter how many moderators you throw at it.