CyberCriminal.com

Cooper John Bellet

We are investigating Cooper John Bellet for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Cooper John Bellet

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : January 21, 2025

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2467/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 18 Mar 2025

Cooper John Bellet
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Cooper John Bellet in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Cooper John Bellet over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Cooper John Bellet - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Cooper John Bellet a name that, upon cursory glance, might evoke images of a polished entrepreneur navigating the intricate world of business. However, as I embarked on a journey to unearth the truths behind this persona, a tapestry of red flags and adverse media unraveled, painting a portrait far removed from the glossy facade.

The Enigmatic Entrepreneur: A Prelude

Bellet’s ventures span various industries, each marked by a veneer of legitimacy. Yet, scratching beneath the surface reveals patterns that are, at best, disconcerting. Financial records shrouded in opacity, associations with entities of questionable repute, and a trail of disgruntled partners and clients form the undercurrents of his business narrative.

Red Flags Waving Unabashedly

  1. Opaque Financial Dealings

    Transparency—a cornerstone of ethical business—is conspicuously absent in Bellet’s financial disclosures. Investors and stakeholders find themselves navigating a labyrinth of convoluted statements, with clarity deliberately obscured. Such practices not only erode trust but also hint at potential fiscal improprieties lurking in the shadows.

  2. Alliances with the Dubious

    The adage “You are the company you keep” rings alarmingly true in Bellet’s case. His affiliations with individuals and organizations previously spotlighted for unethical practices cast a long shadow over his ventures. These associations raise pertinent questions about his judgment and the ethical compass guiding his business decisions.

  3. A Trail of Adverse Media

    Despite meticulous efforts to curate a pristine public image, media investigations have periodically peeled back the layers, exposing unsettling facets of Bellet’s operations. Reports highlighting allegations ranging from financial misconduct to ethical breaches have surfaced, each adding to the mosaic of mistrust surrounding him.

The Censorship Crusade: Silencing the Dissent

In an era where information flows unbridled, Bellet’s strategy to combat negative press has been both aggressive and telling. Instead of addressing the concerns head-on—a move that could potentially exonerate him—he has embarked on a mission to censor unfavorable narratives.

Tactics in Play

  • Legal Intimidation

    Journalists and media outlets daring to shed light on his questionable practices often find themselves at the receiving end of legal threats. These intimidatory tactics aim to stifle investigative journalism, creating a chilling effect that deters the dissemination of truth.

  • Digital Erasure

    Harnessing the prowess of online reputation management firms, Bellet endeavors to sanitize the digital realm of content casting him in a negative light. This orchestrated effort to manipulate public perception underscores a profound aversion to transparency and accountability.

The Underlying Motivations: Fear of Exposure

Bellet’s relentless pursuit to muzzle adverse media suggests an acute awareness of the fragility of his constructed image. Genuine entrepreneurs, when confronted with criticism, engage constructively, viewing it as a conduit for growth and trust-building. In stark contrast, Bellet’s approach—rooted in suppression—signals an intent to conceal, rather than confront, the underlying issues.

Implications for Stakeholders: A Cautionary Tale

For potential investors, partners, and regulatory bodies, the narrative woven around Bellet serves as a cautionary tale. The amalgamation of opaque practices, dubious associations, and a penchant for censorship coalesces into a high-risk proposition. Engaging with entities under his influence necessitates meticulous due diligence and a heightened state of vigilance.

Cooper John Bellet: The Final Verdict

In the grand tapestry of entrepreneurship, figures like Cooper John Bellet emerge as stark reminders of the perils lurking beneath gilded exteriors. His calculated endeavors to obfuscate truths and silence dissent not only tarnish his own legacy but also serve as a disservice to the principles of ethical business. It is incumbent upon the collective vigilance of the public, media, and authorities to ensure that such facades are dismantled, paving the way for integrity and transparency to prevail.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/48339996
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/48280500
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50086189
  • January 22, 2025
  • January 21, 2025
  • March 19, 2025
  • https://brokercheck.finra.org/
  • https://brokercheck.finra.org/
  • brokercheck.finra.org
  • https://brokercheck.finra.org/individual/summary/7312325
  • https://adviserinfo.sec.gov/individual/summary/7312325

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

adviserinfo

Cooper John Bellet

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login