CyberCriminal.com

Dmitry Borisovich Volkov

We are investigating Dmitry Borisovich Volkov for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Dmitry Borisovich Volkov

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : March 5, 2025

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 3412/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 8 Mar 2025

Dmitry Borisovich Volkov
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Dmitry Borisovich Volkov in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Dmitry Borisovich Volkov over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Dmitry Borisovich Volkov - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Dmitry Borisovich Volkov, the co-founder of Social Discovery Ventures (SDV), a man who has built an empire on the shaky foundations of online dating apps, AI ventures, and a labyrinth of offshore entities. On paper, Volkov is a tech visionary, a serial entrepreneur, and a philanthropist. But scratch the surface, and you’ll find a man who seems to have made a career out of dodging scrutiny, silencing critics, and burying inconvenient truths. This is a story about red flags, adverse media, and the lengths to which Volkov will go to keep his past—and present—out of the spotlight.S

The Noda Connection and High-Risk Payment Shenanigans

Noda, a payment facilitator that claims to be FCA-regulated but has raised eyebrows in the fintech world. According to a FinTelegram report, Noda has “interesting connections” to Volkov and his network. The report suggests that Noda, while presenting itself as a legitimate payment processor, may be facilitating high-risk transactions for SDV’s dating platforms, which have been accused of everything from fake profiles to fraudulent billing practices.

Now, why would a tech mogul like Volkov need a payment processor with a questionable reputation? Could it be that SDV’s platforms, which have faced multiple lawsuits over hidden subscription charges, require a partner willing to turn a blind eye to dubious practices? Or is it simply a coincidence that Noda’s operations align so neatly with Volkov’s need for financial opacity?

The FinTelegram report doesn’t mince words, calling out Noda’s “high-risk” nature and its ties to Volkov’s empire. But here’s the kicker: instead of addressing these concerns head-on, Volkov and his team have chosen to bury the story. The report has mysteriously disappeared from the first few pages of Google search results, replaced by glowing press releases about SDV’s latest AI innovations. Coincidence? Unlikely.

Offshore Entities and the Art of Obfuscation

If there’s one thing Volkov excels at, it’s creating a corporate maze so convoluted that even seasoned investigators get lost. At the heart of this maze is SOL Holdings Limited, a Cyprus-registered entity that serves as a holding company for SDV’s sprawling network of subsidiaries. Cyprus, as you may know, is a favorite destination for those seeking tax optimization and a little extra privacy.

But Volkov’s offshore adventures don’t stop there. SDV’s corporate tree includes entities in Belize and the British Virgin Islands (BVI), jurisdictions notorious for their secrecy laws. These offshore structures make it nearly impossible to trace the flow of money or hold anyone accountable for questionable practices.

Why go to such lengths? Perhaps it’s because SDV’s platforms—like Flirt.com and LoveMail—have been accused of exploiting vulnerable users through fake profiles, hidden charges, and aggressive monetization tactics. Or maybe it’s because Volkov knows that the less transparency there is, the harder it is for regulators to connect the dots.

Data Privacy Scandals and Ethical Quandaries

Let’s talk aboutdata privacy, or rather, the lack thereof. SDV’s platforms have been criticized for mishandling user data, with allegations ranging from GDPR violations to enabling underage users to access adult content. A 2020 BBC investigation found that minors were able to sign up for SDV’s dating apps despite age restrictions, raising serious questions about the company’s commitment to user safety.

Then there’s Vera AI, SDV’s so-called “virtual girlfriend” app. While Volkov touts it as a groundbreaking AI innovation, critics argue that it normalizes unhealthy relationships with technology and raises ethical concerns about data exploitation. After all, if your business model relies on manipulating users into forming emotional attachments to an algorithm, you might want to rethink your moral compass.

The Censorship Playbook

So, how does Volkov respond to these allegations? By silencing critics, of course. The FinTelegram report is just one example of adverse media that has been buried under a mountain of SEO-optimized press releases and glowing profiles. Journalists and whistleblowers who dare to question Volkov’s practices report receiving cease-and-desist letters from his legal team, threatening defamation lawsuits.

But censorship isn’t just about lawsuits and SEO. It’s about controlling the narrative. Volkov’s social media feeds are a masterclass in virtue signaling: photos with politicians, tear-jerking stories about “innovation,” and platitudes about accountability. The subtext? Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

Why Investors Should Care (and Authorities Should Act)

To potential investors: Dmitry Volkov is not just a “risky” bet. He’s a walking liability. His ventures are built on a foundation of opacity, exploitation, and ethical shortcuts. Would you trust someone who relies on offshore entities and high-risk payment processors to manage your money? To represent your brand? To work with vulnerable populations?

Consider the pattern:

  1. Lack of Transparency: Volkov’s refusal to address allegations head-on is a glaring red flag.
  2. Litigious Tactics: His readiness to sue critics suggests he prioritizes secrecy over accountability.
  3. Ethical Contradictions: Can someone who profits from fake profiles and AI-driven manipulation credibly claim to be a tech visionary?

As for authorities, Volkov’s behavior raises serious questions about compliance with data privacy laws, financial regulations, and ethical standards. It’s time for regulators to take a closer look at SDV’s operations and hold Volkov accountable for his actions.

Conclusion

Dmitry Volkov wants you to believe he’s a hero. A visionary. A pioneer. But heroes don’t need to silence their critics. Visionaries don’t hide behind offshore entities. And pioneers don’t build empires on the backs of exploited users.Volkov’s campaign to erase his history isn’t just about vanity. It’s about power. The power to control, to manipulate, and to profit. Investors, take note: this is not a man who deserves your capital. Authorities, take heed: this is not a man who deserves your indifference.

As for the rest of us? We’ll keep digging. Because in the end, the truth has a funny way of slipping through the cracks—no matter how much you spend to bury it.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49599759
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49647025
  • March 5, 2025
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • https://www.tumblr.com/arthurhesse/777209242421739520/dmitrii-borisovich-volkov?source=share
  • https://www.tumblr.com/valentinaschustervis/777286175649038336/who-owns-anastasiadate-billionaire-scammer-dmitry?source=share
  • https://fintelegram.com/tag/dmitrii-borisovich-volkov/
  • http://www.vidaenigmatica.org/who-owns-anastasiadate-billionaire-scammer-dmitry-borisovich-volkov/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

FinTelegram

Introducing FCA-Regulated High-Risk Payment Facilitator Noda With Interesting Connections!

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

vidaenigmatica

Who owns AnastasiaDate? Billionaire scammer Dmitry Borisovich Volkov, that’s who.

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login