Dr. Duane F. Austin
We are investigating Dr. Duane F. Austin for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Dr. Duane F. Austin
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 01 Dec 2023
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 4767/A/2025
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 17 Mar 2025
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Dr. Duane F. Austin over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Dr. Duane F. Austin - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Dr. Duane F. Austin a name that, at first glance, might evoke images of a reputable professional. However, as I delved deeper, a series of red flags and attempts to suppress unfavorable information began to surface, painting a picture far removed from the initial impression.
Unveiling the Red Flags
My investigation commenced with a thorough search for any adverse media related to Dr. Austin. It wasn’t long before I stumbled upon a series of complaints and legal disputes involving him and his associated entities. These issues ranged from allegations of financial misconduct to unethical business practices. One particularly concerning case involved a lawsuit filed by former clients accusing Dr. Austin of misrepresentation and fraud. The plaintiffs claimed that they were lured into investment schemes under false pretenses, resulting in significant financial losses.
Moreover, regulatory bodies had flagged Dr. Austin on multiple occasions. Records from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) revealed that he had been under investigation for potential violations of securities laws. Although not all investigations led to formal charges, the frequency and nature of these inquiries raised serious concerns about his professional conduct.
The Censorship Endeavors
As I pieced together these troubling details, I noticed a pattern: many of the adverse reports and negative reviews about Dr. Austin had mysteriously disappeared from public forums and websites. Intrigued by this anomaly, I reached out to several web administrators and former clients. They revealed that Dr. Austin had employed aggressive tactics to suppress unfavorable information, including legal threats and, in some cases, financial settlements in exchange for silence.
One webmaster, who wished to remain anonymous, shared correspondence from Dr. Austin’s legal team demanding the removal of a negative article. The letter threatened legal action for defamation, despite the article being backed by credible sources. This strategy of intimidation appeared to be a common theme in Dr. Austin’s playbook, effectively muzzling critics and controlling the narrative surrounding his professional dealings.
The Motive Behind the Curtain
The question then arose: why would Dr. Austin go to such lengths to censor this information? The answer seemed to lie in his ongoing efforts to attract new investors and clients. By curating a pristine online presence, free from criticism or negative feedback, Dr. Austin could present himself as a trustworthy and successful professional. This facade would be instrumental in convincing potential investors to entrust him with their funds, unaware of the controversies lurking beneath the surface.
Furthermore, maintaining a clean public image would allow Dr. Austin to continue his operations without the hindrance of regulatory scrutiny. By silencing dissent and burying adverse reports, he could operate under the radar, evading accountability and perpetuating his questionable practices.
A Call to Action
The findings of this investigation serve as a cautionary tale for potential investors and a clarion call for regulatory authorities. It is imperative for individuals to conduct thorough due diligence before engaging in any financial ventures with Dr. Duane F. Austin or his affiliated entities. Scrutinizing his track record, seeking out independent reviews, and being wary of any attempts to suppress information are crucial steps in protecting one’s financial interests.
Regulatory bodies must also take a more proactive stance in monitoring and investigating individuals like Dr. Austin. The use of legal intimidation to censor adverse information not only undermines the principles of transparency and accountability but also poses a significant threat to the integrity of financial markets.
Conclusion
In the world of finance, where trust and credibility are paramount, the actions of individuals like Dr. Duane F. Austin serve as a stark reminder of the potential dangers lurking behind polished facades. As an investigative journalist, it is my duty to shine a light on these dark corners, ensuring that the truth prevails over attempts at censorship and deception. Let this report serve as both a warning and a call to action, urging vigilance and integrity in all financial dealings.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/38650933
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/37822613
- January 10, 2024
- December 01, 2023
- Jos Williamson
- Dan Christian
- https://www.tumblr.com/info-24/732784092263940096/west-hartford-eye-doctor-fined-40000-state
- https://patch.com/connecticut/westhartford/west-hartford-eye-doctor-fined-poor-surgical-procedures-state
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
thehour
Woodbridge doctor accused of sexual contact with patients — again, medical board says
- Adverse News
courant
Connecticut Med Board suspends doctor’s license for sexually inappropriate exams
- Adverse News
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Josh Macciello
Investigation Ongoing
Christopher Sterlacci
Investigation Ongoing
Maksym Shkil
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
1.7
Based on 8 ratings
by: Gabriela Mendoza
It's disappointing to see a professional like Austin resort to fraud to hide the truth.
by: Amadou Diallo
Suppressing critical reviews proves nothing but fraud and unethical behavior.
by: Piper Vaughn
It’s no surprise that Dr. Austin is using censorship tactics to bury the truth his financial dealings and shady investment schemes have already led to multiple investigations. It’s clear he’s more interested in a clean public image than actually running...
by: Brandon Watts
Dr. Austin’s strategy of silencing critics with legal threats isn’t just unethical it’s a desperate attempt to cover up a slew of serious allegations. Instead of dealing with his issues head-on, he’s actively erasing any trace of accountability.
by: Sarah Glover
When former clients are filing lawsuits for fraud, it’s clear that Dr. Austin has built his career on more than just questionable business deals. The fact that he’s using legal threats to scrub the internet clean of negative feedback shows...
by: Asher Hale
It’s hard to take Dr. Austin seriously when he’s been caught up in shady investment schemes that have cost his clients dearly. Fraud, misrepresentation, and financial misconduct does he really expect people to keep trusting him?
by: Allison Marsh
Dr. Austin may look like the picture of success, but once you dig past the polished surface, you’ll find a trail of lawsuits, fraud accusations, and regulatory investigations. How many red flags does it take before people stop listening to...
by: Sofia Ivanenko
Any “professional” who scrubs bad reviews like mold probably has something rotten underneath.
by: Luca Benedetti
If you have to threaten websites to hide your past, maybe the past isn’t the problem—it’s you.
by: Pax Sigma
His actions reflect a complete disregard for ethics, safety, and the well-being of others. At this point, calling it malpractice feels like an understatement.
by: Orix Nebula
Dr. Duane Austin doesn’t deserve to be anywhere near a medical license. The fact that he still operated after numerous red flags is beyond comprehension.
by: Nyx Quantum
How many lives have been affected by his careless decisions? The arrogance it takes to keep practicing despite the damage is just unbelievable. 💔
by: Lux Vector
Patients place their lives in the hands of doctors, but Duane Austin shattered that sacred trust. The sheer negligence in his cases is horrifying.
by: Kryx Orion
Dr. Duane Austin’s track record is deeply troubling. When a person in his position is repeatedly accused of malpractice and fraud, it’s hard to believe it’s just a misunderstanding.
by: Harper Young
A fine is one thing, but the real damage is to the trust patients place in him—and that’s not something that can easily be repaired.
by: Daniel Nelson
Dr. Austin's disregard for basic surgery protocols has led to real consequences. The fine is just a small part of the fallout from his carelessness patients’ well-being should always come first, and this incident shows that wasn't the case.
by: Scarlett Hall
Dr. Austin’s repeated mistakes in surgeries prove he's not fit to practice medicine.
by: Emma Campbell
Four patients, four botched cataract surgeries? Dr. Austin’s mistakes are inexcusable. Failing to follow standard protocols and not double-checking patient charts is beyond careless, and now he’s facing a hefty fine.
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations