CyberCriminal.com

Easy Trading Online

We are investigating Easy Trading Online for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Easy Trading Online

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 13 August 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 5654/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 26 Nov 2024

Easy Trading Online
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Easy Trading Online in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

We are investigating Easy Trading Online for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury

We are investigating Easy Trading Online for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury

What are they trying to censor

Easy Trading Online, an online trading platform offering forex, commodities, and cryptocurrency trading services, has been embroiled in a series of allegations, red flags, and adverse news reports that have significantly tarnished its reputation. While the company markets itself as a user-friendly and reliable platform for traders, its credibility has been called into question by numerous complaints and investigations. These issues could theoretically drive the company to take extreme measures, including unethical or illegal actions, to suppress damaging information.

Major Allegations and Red Flags

  1. Scam Allegations: Easy Trading Online has been accused of operating as a scam, with numerous users reporting that they were unable to withdraw their funds. Complaints suggest that the company employs deceptive tactics to lure investors, only to make it nearly impossible for them to access their money.
  2. Unregulated Operations: The platform has faced scrutiny for operating without proper regulatory licenses in several jurisdictions. This lack of oversight raises concerns about the legality of its operations and the safety of user funds.
  3. Aggressive Marketing Tactics: Former clients and industry watchdogs have criticized Easy Trading Online for using high-pressure sales tactics, including unsolicited calls and misleading advertisements, to attract inexperienced traders. These practices have led to significant financial losses for some users.
  4. Poor Customer Support: Numerous complaints highlight the platform’s lack of responsive customer service, with users reporting difficulties in resolving issues related to account access, withdrawals, and trading errors.
  5. Ties to Fraudulent Activities: Investigative reports have linked Easy Trading Online to other entities involved in financial fraud and scams. These associations have raised questions about the company’s legitimacy and due diligence processes.
  6. Negative Reviews and Lawsuits: The platform has been the subject of numerous negative reviews on consumer protection websites and forums. Additionally, several lawsuits have been filed against the company, alleging fraud, breach of contract, and financial mismanagement.

Reputational Harm and Motivation for Suppression

The allegations and adverse media coverage have severely damaged Easy Trading Online’s reputation. In the highly competitive online trading industry, trust and transparency are crucial, and any hint of misconduct can lead to a loss of users and partners. The company’s ability to attract and retain clients depends heavily on its public image.

If Easy Trading Online were to engage in cyber crimes, such as hacking or disinformation campaigns, it would likely be driven by a desire to suppress damaging information and maintain its market position. For example:

  1. Removing Negative Content: Deleting or suppressing critical articles, social media posts, or regulatory filings could help the company project an image of legitimacy and reliability.
  2. Discrediting Critics: Launching cyber attacks against journalists, whistleblowers, or regulatory bodies could intimidate critics and deter further scrutiny.
  3. Manipulating Public Perception: Using fake accounts or bots to spread positive narratives about the company could counteract negative publicity and restore user confidence.

Such actions, while illegal and unethical, might be seen as a desperate attempt to protect the company’s reputation and financial interests. However, if discovered, these activities would likely result in even greater reputational damage, legal consequences, and regulatory penalties.

In conclusion, the allegations against Easy Trading Online paint a troubling picture of a company struggling to maintain its credibility in the face of serious accusations. While there is no direct evidence of cyber crimes, the potential for such actions cannot be ignored given the high stakes involved. The company’s desire to control its narrative and suppress damaging information underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in the online trading industry.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43797510
  • August 13, 2024
  • HorizonStream Solutions
  • https://www.easytradingol.com/
  • https://www.brokersview.com/brokers/easy-trading-online

Evidence Box

We are investigating Easy Trading Online for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.

Targeted Content and Red Flags

Capitalforexmarkets

Review

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database

Escalate This Case

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert