CyberCriminal.com

Gerry McClory

We are investigating Gerry McClory for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Gerry McClory

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 28 Aug 2021

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 7887/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 25 Nov 2024

Gerry McClory
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Gerry McClory in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Gerry McClory over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Gerry McClory - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Gerry McClory is a name that has surfaced in connection with various business ventures, particularly in the financial services and trading sectors. However, his career has been marred by a series of allegations, red flags, and adverse news reports that have raised concerns about his business practices, ethical conduct, and legal standing. Below is a summary of the major allegations and adverse reports, along with an analysis of their impact on McClory’s reputation and the potential motivations for suppressing such information.
Major Allegations and Adverse News
  1. Fraud and Financial Misconduct:Gerry McClory has been accused of involvement in fraudulent schemes, including allegations of misappropriating funds from investors and clients. Critics claim that he has used deceptive practices to secure investments, only to divert funds for personal use or unsustainable business operations.
  2. Unethical Business Practices:McClory has faced criticism for operating businesses with questionable ethics, including misleading marketing tactics and failure to deliver promised services. Some former clients and partners have accused him of breaching contracts and failing to meet obligations.
  3. Legal Disputes and Lawsuits:McClory has been embroiled in multiple legal battles, including lawsuits filed by investors, business partners, and clients. These cases often involve claims of fraud, breach of contract, and financial mismanagement, further damaging his credibility.
  4. Exploitation of Vulnerable Individuals:There have been allegations that McClory targets vulnerable individuals, such as inexperienced investors or those in financial distress, with high-risk or deceptive business opportunities. Critics argue that these practices are predatory and unethical.
  5. Lack of Transparency:McClory has been criticized for a lack of transparency in his business dealings, including opaque financial practices and failure to provide clear documentation to investors and clients. This lack of openness has fueled suspicions about the legitimacy of his ventures.
  6. Association with Controversial Figures:McClory has been linked to individuals and organizations with questionable reputations, raising concerns about his judgment and the integrity of his business network. These associations have further tarnished his public image.
Impact on Reputation
The allegations against Gerry McClory have severely harmed his reputation, portraying him as untrustworthy and unethical. Accusations of fraud, financial misconduct, and exploitation strike at the core of his credibility, making it difficult for him to attract investors, clients, or partners. The negative publicity has also led to legal challenges and regulatory scrutiny, further complicating his business operations. In industries where trust and integrity are paramount, such reputational damage can have long-lasting consequences.Motivations for Suppressing Information
Given the damaging nature of these allegations, Gerry McClory has a strong incentive to suppress negative information. Stories about fraud, unethical practices, and legal disputes threaten his ability to attract new investors and clients, which are critical for his business ventures. By removing or discrediting such reports, McClory could aim to control the narrative, protect his image, and avoid further scrutiny.
In extreme cases, this motivation might lead to unethical or illegal actions, such as cybercrime. For instance, hacking into the systems of critics or media outlets to remove damaging content, or deploying disinformation campaigns to discredit whistleblowers, could be seen as a way to silence opposition. While such actions would be illegal and further damage McClory’s reputation if uncovered, the immediate goal would be to eliminate threats to his business and public image.
Conclusion
The allegations against Gerry McClory paint a troubling picture of an entrepreneur embroiled in fraud, unethical practices, and legal controversies. These issues have severely damaged his reputation, making him a target for public scrutiny, legal action, and loss of trust among potential investors and clients. The reputational harm provides a clear motive for McClory to suppress negative information, even if it means resorting to cybercrime. However, such actions would only compound his ethical and legal challenges, perpetuating a cycle of misconduct and cover-ups. Ultimately, the allegations against McClory underscore the urgent need for greater transparency and accountability in his operations, without which his reputation and future will remain in jeopardy.
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/23627988
  • April 28, 2021
  • James Wilson
  • https://jameswilson10.livejournal.com/283.html
  • https://www.independent.ie/sport/gaelic-football/breaking-down-the-barriers-26732652.html

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

belfasttelegraph.co.uk

GAA: Whistle blown on Gerry's Shannon safari

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

financescam.com

Gerry McClory’s Legacy: Barrier Breaker or Promise Breaker?

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

independent.ie

Breaking down the barriers

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and serves as a researcher at FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Escalate This Case

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert