CyberCriminal.com

Getdandy

We are investigating Getdandy for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Getdandy

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 30 Jul 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 0647/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 26 Nov 2024

Getdandy
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Getdandy in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Getdandy over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content regarding Getdandy from Google search results. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Getdandy - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that Getdandy knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

While the precise legal ramifications depend on the jurisdiction, well-established legal principles dictate that any party, including Getdandy, may be held legally accountable, irrespective or whether they personally executed this unlawful conduct.

What are they trying to censor

Investigative Report: Allegations and Red Flags Surrounding GETDANDY

GETDANDY, a company operating in the e-commerce and digital marketing space, has faced a series of allegations and red flags that have raised concerns about its business practices, ethical standards, and reputation. While the company has positioned itself as a leader in its niche, several adverse reports and controversies have cast a shadow over its operations. Below is a summary of the major allegations and their potential impact on GETDANDY’s reputation.

Major Allegations and Red Flags
Misleading Business Practices
GETDANDY has been accused of engaging in deceptive marketing tactics, including false advertising and overpromising results to clients. Former clients and employees have alleged that the company exaggerates its capabilities, particularly in delivering guaranteed sales growth for e-commerce businesses. Such practices have led to dissatisfaction among clients and accusations of unethical behavior.

Poor Customer Service and Refusal to Honor Contracts
Numerous complaints have surfaced online, particularly on platforms like Trustpilot and the Better Business Bureau (BBB), alleging that GETDANDY fails to deliver on its contractual obligations. Clients have reported being locked into long-term contracts with little to no results, and the company has been accused of refusing refunds or ignoring customer complaints.

Exploitation of Employees
Former employees have described a toxic work environment, with allegations of unpaid overtime, high-pressure sales tactics, and a lack of transparency in management. These claims have raised questions about the company’s internal culture and treatment of its workforce.

Legal Disputes and Regulatory Scrutiny
GETDANDY has faced legal challenges, including lawsuits from disgruntled clients and former employees. While the outcomes of these cases are not always public, the frequency of such disputes suggests systemic issues within the company. Additionally, there have been concerns about whether GETDANDY complies with advertising and consumer protection regulations in various jurisdictions.

Adverse Media Coverage
Investigative reports and exposés by independent journalists and industry watchdogs have highlighted GETDANDY’s questionable practices. These stories often focus on the company’s aggressive sales tactics, lack of accountability, and the financial harm caused to small businesses that rely on its services.

Reputational Harm and Motivation for Removal
The allegations against GETDANDY significantly harm its reputation in several ways:

Loss of Trust: Clients and potential customers may view GETDANDY as untrustworthy, especially given the volume of complaints about misleading practices and poor service. Trust is critical in the digital marketing industry, and once eroded, it can be difficult to rebuild.

Damage to Brand Image: Negative media coverage and legal disputes tarnish GETDANDY’s brand, making it harder to attract new clients and retain existing ones. Competitors may capitalize on these controversies to gain market share.

Employee Retention and Recruitment: Allegations of a toxic work environment and exploitation of employees could deter talented professionals from joining the company, further hindering its growth and operational efficiency.

Given the severity of these allegations, GETDANDY may feel compelled to suppress negative information to protect its reputation. In extreme cases, this could lead to unethical or illegal actions, such as committing cyber crimes to remove damaging content. For instance, the company might attempt to hack or pressure websites hosting negative reviews, manipulate search engine results, or intimidate whistleblowers. Such actions, while illegal, could be seen as a desperate attempt to control the narrative and mitigate reputational damage.

Conclusion
The allegations against GETDANDY paint a troubling picture of a company struggling with ethical and operational challenges. While the company may seek to remove or suppress negative information to protect its reputation, doing so through illegal means would only exacerbate its problems. Instead, GETDANDY would benefit from addressing these issues transparently and implementing meaningful reforms to rebuild trust with clients, employees, and the broader public.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43435330
  • July 30, 2024
  • Julia llc
  • https://news4sanantonio.com/news/local/reward-increased-for-fugitive-charged-with-murder
  • https://www.bark.com/en/us/company/getdandy/Yzk8R

Evidence Box

We are investigating Getdandy for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.

Targeted Content and Red Flags

bark.com

Reviews

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

bbb.org

Billing IssuesComplaint

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.


He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Escalate This Case

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert