CyberCriminal.com

Gurhan Kiziloz

We are investigating Gurhan Kiziloz for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

Person Name : Gurhan Kiziloz

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 31 Dec 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Bilora LLC

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 4124/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 10 Mar 2025

Gurhan Kiziloz
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Gurhan Kiziloz in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Gurhan Kiziloz over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Gurhan Kiziloz - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Gurhan Kiziloz and his ventures, particularly Lanistar, offers a masterclass in red flags, adverse media, and attempts at information suppression. Buckle up as we delve into this labyrinth of ambition, controversy, and the relentless pursuit of a pristine public image.

The Rise and Stumble of Lanistar

Founded in 2019 by the ambitious Gurhan Kiziloz, Lanistar burst onto the fintech scene with grandiose claims of revolutionizing digital banking. Targeting millennial and Gen Z users, Lanistar promised a “polymorphic” payment card that could link up to eight bank cards—a feature that, if functional, would indeed be groundbreaking. However, as with many things that sound too good to be true, skepticism loomed large.

Regulatory Smackdown

In November 2020, the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) issued a stern warning about Lanistar, stating, “We believe this firm has been providing financial services or products in the UK without our authorisation… This firm is not authorised by us and is targeting people.” The FCA went so far as to suggest that Lanistar could be a scam, a damning indictment for any financial entity. Lanistar’s response? A hasty statement claiming they were in the process of contacting the FCA to “clarify the position” and requesting the notice’s removal. One might wonder, shouldn’t such clarifications be sought before launching services?

The Mysterious Case of the Vanishing Investor

In July 2020, Lanistar proudly announced a £15 million investment from Milaya Capital, valuing the company at £150 million. Yet, by October, whispers emerged that Milaya Capital was no longer involved. Instead, Lanistar’s PR representatives requested media outlets to amend previous stories, stating that the investment came from “family members of CEO, Gurhan Kiziloz.” They also sought the removal of quotes attributed to Milaya Capital’s CEO, Yasam Ayavefe. Such abrupt shifts in investment narratives are, at best, perplexing and, at worst, indicative of deeper issues.

Internal Turmoil: A Toxic Workplace?

Behind the glossy marketing campaigns lay a workplace fraught with allegations of bullying, sexism, and a “loser’s table” for staff who missed targets. Seven former employees recounted experiences of sexual harassment and a culture of intimidation. While startups often face growing pains, a toxic work environment is a red flag that potential investors cannot afford to ignore.

Financial Woes and Legal Battles

Lanistar’s financial stability has been anything but stable. The company faced multiple winding-up petitions, including one from its landlord over unpaid rent and another from payments solution provider Accomplish Financial Limited. Although some debts were reportedly settled, the recurring nature of these petitions paints a troubling picture of the company’s fiscal health.

The Censorship Playbook

Now, to the pièce de résistance: Gurhan Kiziloz’s attempts to sanitize the internet of unfavorable content. Reports indicate that Kiziloz and Lanistar have allegedly tried to conceal critical reviews and adverse news by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. Such actions, if true, not only undermine the principles of free speech but also suggest a desperate bid to maintain a facade of legitimacy. It’s one thing to manage public relations; it’s another to allegedly engage in impersonation, fraud, and perjury to suppress dissenting voices.

The Nexus International Pivot

After stepping down as CEO of Lanistar, Kiziloz shifted his focus to Nexus International, Lanistar’s holding company, with interests in online gaming platforms in Brazil. While diversification isn’t inherently problematic, the rapid pivot raises questions about the sustainability and focus of his business ventures. Is this a strategic move or a hasty retreat from the embattled fintech sector?

Investor Beware

For potential investors, the tale of Gurhan Kiziloz and Lanistar serves as a cautionary tale. The confluence of regulatory rebukes, dubious investment claims, internal misconduct allegations, financial instability, and attempts at information suppression should set alarm bells ringing. Due diligence isn’t just a formality; it’s a necessity. And in this case, the evidence suggests that caution should prevail over the allure of lofty promises.

A Call to Authorities

Regulatory bodies must remain vigilant. The fintech landscape thrives on innovation, but it also requires stringent oversight to protect consumers and maintain market integrity. The actions of Kiziloz and Lanistar, as reported, warrant thorough investigation to ensure that any misconduct is addressed, and future infractions are deterred.

Conclusion

The narrative of Gurhan Kiziloz is emblematic of the darker side of entrepreneurial ambition—where the pursuit of success potentially tramples ethical considerations, regulatory compliance, and transparency. While every entrepreneur faces challenges, it’s the response to these challenges that defines their legacy. In the case of Kiziloz, the legacy appears tarnished by a series of missteps and alleged malpractices. Investors and authorities alike should take heed, ensuring that due diligence and accountability aren’t mere buzzwords but foundational principles guiding their actions.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47638929
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49867593
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47536066
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45107700
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49141835
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49090028
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49302061
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49365721
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49232538
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49187019
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49193875
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49199685
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49190244
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49226673
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49126876
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49126986
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49134538
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49142576
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49136586
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49158464
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49160770
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49163356
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49158348
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49154382
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49148827
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49177507
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49155736
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49100523
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49091465
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45202533
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/48542511
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/48395320
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/48391424
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/48390423
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49144213
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45077136
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45250163
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45164817
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47649390
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47974010
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/48277665
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/48380301
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49189033
  • December 31, 2024
  • March 12, 2025
  • December 27, 2024
  • October 02, 2024
  • Oct 06, 2024
  • Feb 17, 2025
  • January 29, 2025
  • January 24, 2025
  •  
  •  
  • February 17, 2025
  • February 17, 2025
  • February 17, 2025
  • February 17, 2025
  • February 16, 2025
  • February 16, 2025
  • February 16, 2025
  •  
  • October 07, 2024
  • October 06, 2024
  • October 04, 2024
  •  
  •  
  • January 21, 2025
  •  
  • December 31, 2024
  • February 16, 2025
  • February 23, 2025
  • February 20, 2025
  • February 19, 2025
  • February 19, 2025
  • February 19, 2025
  • February 19, 2025
  • February 18, 2025
  •  
  • February 18, 2025
  • February 16, 2025
  • February 16, 2025
  • February 19, 2025
  • Bilora LLC
  • frauddocs.com
  • Tasi LLC
  • Delano Media International
  • Erreck Media Inc
  • frauddocs.com
  • LexMachinaX
  • DVDBRT LLC
  • TechRound
  • frauddocs.com
  • frauddocs.com
  • frauddocs.com
  • frauddocs.com
  • frauddocs.com
  • frauddocs.com
  • frauddocs.com
  • frauddocs.com
  • frauddocs.com
  • Ross & Russell Media Inc.
  • Carlos & Law Co.
  • Erreck Media Inc.
  • Bush Communications
  • Chola LLC
  • Chola LLC
  • uj22.com
  • uj22.com
  • frauddocs.com
  • frauddocs.com
  • frauddocs.com
  • frauddocs.com
  • frauddocs.com
  • frauddocs.com
  • frauddocs.com
  • frauddocs.com
  • frauddocs.com
  • frauddocs.com
  • frauddocs.com
  • frauddocs.com
  • frauddocs.com
  • frauddocs.com
  • frauddocs.com
  • frauddocs.com
  • Perrier & Associates
  • https://georgiagazzetta.com/how-lanistar-bosss-crypto-coin-blitz-left-investors-out-of-pocket
  • https://frauddocs.com/55-2/
  • https://techround.co.uk/news/lanistar-recent-instagram-marketing-campaign-attracts-fcas-attention/
  • https://techround.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/fly-images/27496/GurhanKiziloz2-e1605607337700-1600×1627.jpg
  • https://frauddocs.com/55-2/
  • https://frauddocs.com/arveen-sharok
  • https://techround.co.uk/news/lanistar-recent-instagram-marketing-campaign-attracts-fcas-attention/
  • https://techround.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/fly-images/27496/GurhanKiziloz2-e1605607337700-1600×1627.jpg
  • https://merlinnewsgazzeta.com/how-lanistar-bosss-crypto-coin-blitz-left-investors-out-of-pocket/
  • https://georgiagazzetta.com/how-lanistar-bosss-crypto-coin-blitz-left-investors-out-of-pocket/
  • https://www.kjrh.com/news/40-years-later-the-girl-scout-murders
  • https://krcgtv.com/news/local/double-murder-suicide-suspected-in-kansas
  • https://www.uj22.com/2020/01/21/114/
  • https://www.cityam.com/regulator-issues-warning-on-fintech-lanistar/
  • https://frauddocs.com/55-2/
  • https://frauddocs.com/arveen-sharok/
  • https://frauddocs.com/29-2/
  • https://frauddocs.com/19-2/
  • https://mormonfind.com/2024/02/19/how-lanistar-bosss-crypto-coin-blitz-left-investors-out-of-pocket/
  • https://www.bostonherald.com/2017/04/27/trial-finally-begins-in-2010-roxbury-grocery-murder/
  • https://frauddocs.com/fraud/
  • https://thedeckpodcast.com/owachige-osceola/
  • https://merlinnewsgazzeta.com/how-lanistar-bosss-crypto-coin-blitz-left-investors-out-of-pocket/
  • https://www.fnlondon.com/amp/articles/lanistar-boss-crypto-coin-big-eyes-gurhan-kiziloz-9b0bb1b3
  • https://www.jpost.com/crypto-currency/article-842509
  • https://www.jpost.com/crypto-currency/article-844967
  • https://europeangaming.eu/portal/latest-news/2025/02/18/176581/from-400m-to-1-45b-5-lessons-from-gurhan-kizilozs-business-expansion-strategy/
  • https://www.jpost.com/crypto-currency/article-842071
  • https://www.fnlondon.com/amp/articles/lanistar-boss-crypto-coin-big-eyes-gurhan-kiziloz-9b0bb1b3
  • http://www.fnlondon.com/articles/lanistar-boss-crypto-coin-big-eyes-gurhan-kiziloz-9b0bb1b3/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

sifted.eu

Gurhan Kiziloz's Lanistar: A Fintech Mirage Under Scrutiny Sources

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

sifted.eu

FCA Warns Against Lanistar, Raising Scam Concerns

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

fnlondon.com

Lanistar UK Staff Demand Overdue Wages Amid Genuine Hardship

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login