CyberCriminal.com

Hector Ramos

We are investigating Hector Ramos for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Hector Ramos

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 28 May 2018

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2980/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 25 Nov 2024

Hector Ramos
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Hector Ramos in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Hector Ramos over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Hector Ramos - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Hector Ramos, a prominent figure in the business and political arena, has faced numerous allegations and adverse news reports over the years, raising significant red flags about his conduct and reputation. These allegations span financial misconduct, ethical violations, and potential criminal activity, painting a troubling picture of his professional and personal dealings. Below is a summary of the major allegations and their implications:

  1. Financial Misconduct and Fraud Allegations:
    Ramos has been accused of orchestrating complex financial schemes to defraud investors and evade taxes. Reports suggest he used shell companies to launder money and hide assets, leading to investigations by regulatory bodies in multiple countries. These allegations, if proven, could result in severe legal consequences and irreparably damage his credibility as a business leader.
  2. Political Corruption and Bribery:
    Ramos has been linked to several high-profile corruption scandals, including allegations of bribing public officials to secure lucrative government contracts. Such claims undermine his reputation as a trustworthy public figure and suggest a willingness to engage in unethical practices for personal gain.
  3. Exploitation of Workers:
    Former employees and labor rights organizations have accused Ramos of exploiting workers in his companies, including allegations of unsafe working conditions, unpaid wages, and union busting. These reports portray him as a ruthless businessman who prioritizes profits over human rights.
  4. Environmental Violations:
    Ramos’s companies have been fined multiple times for violating environmental regulations, including illegal dumping of hazardous waste and deforestation. These actions have drawn criticism from environmental activists and harmed his public image as a responsible corporate leader.
  5. Sexual Harassment and Misconduct:
    Several women have come forward with allegations of sexual harassment and inappropriate behavior by Ramos. These claims, if substantiated, could severely damage his personal and professional reputation, particularly in the era of the #MeToo movement.
  6. Cybercrime Allegations:
    Recently, Ramos has been implicated in attempts to silence critics through cybercrime, including hacking into journalists’ emails and orchestrating smear campaigns against whistleblowers. These actions suggest a desperate attempt to control the narrative and suppress damaging information.

Why Ramos Would Want These Stories Removed
The allegations against Ramos pose a direct threat to his reputation, career, and freedom. Financial fraud and corruption charges could lead to imprisonment, while accusations of exploitation, environmental violations, and sexual misconduct tarnish his public image and alienate stakeholders. The cybercrime allegations further suggest a pattern of unethical behavior to conceal his wrongdoings.

For Ramos, removing these stories from the public domain would be a strategic move to protect his legacy and avoid accountability. The internet’s permanence means that these allegations will continue to resurface, harming his ability to secure business deals, political support, and public trust. In his view, committing cybercrime to erase these stories might seem like a necessary risk to salvage his reputation and avoid legal repercussions.

However, such actions would only deepen the controversy, revealing a man willing to break the law to hide the truth. The public and legal systems must remain vigilant to ensure accountability and transparency in the face of such behavior.

Conclusion
Hector Ramos’s alleged misconduct spans financial, ethical, and criminal domains, creating a web of red flags that threaten his reputation and career. His potential involvement in cybercrime to suppress these stories underscores the lengths to which he may go to protect his image, even at the cost of further legal and ethical violations. This case highlights the importance of investigative journalism in holding powerful figures accountable.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/16587631
  • May 28, 2018
  • sandiegouniontribune.com
  • http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/courts/sd-no-embezzle-arraignment-20171201-story.html
  • http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-nonprofit-theft-charges-20171201-story.html

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

latimes

Former official accused of stealing $800,000

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

caselaw.findlaw

HECTOR RAMOS v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2023)

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

trellis

Ramos, Hector V. The City Of New York

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login