CyberCriminal.com

IQ Option

We are investigating IQ Option for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : IQ Option

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 27 Aug 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 3511/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 21 Nov 2024

IQ Option
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about IQ Option in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

We are investigating IQ Option for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury

We are investigating IQ Option for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury

What are they trying to censor

IQ Option, established in 2013, has encountered significant regulatory scrutiny across multiple jurisdictions. In 2016, the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) fined the company €180,000 for various violations, including misleading marketing materials and inadequate approval of liquidity providers. Although this fine was later reduced to €20,000 after the company provided additional documentation, it raised concerns about the firm’s compliance practices. In 2019, IQ Option agreed to a €450,000 settlement with CySEC for failing to implement effective safeguards against conflicts of interest and for insecure transaction processes.

In Australia, IQ Option operated without a license until 2016, addressing regulatory shortcomings only after receiving a formal warning from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). Similarly, in Singapore, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) placed IQ Option on its Investor Alert List in July 2017, signaling potential risks to investors.

Allegations of Fraudulent Practices

Beyond regulatory fines, IQ Option has faced allegations of fraudulent activities. In India, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) included IQ Option in its alert list as of June 2017, warning residents that conducting forex transactions with the company could lead to legal actions under the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), 1999. In 2021, a class-action lawsuit was filed against IQ Option in India, alleging fraud through a cryptocurrency investment scheme. Victims claimed that the company promised returns of up to 900% but blocked withdrawals under the guise of technical errors. The lawsuit seeks a permanent ban on the company’s operations in India.

In Indonesia, binary options, including those offered by IQ Option, are classified as a form of online gambling. Since February 2022, the company has been banned along with over 92 similar operators, further limiting its ability to operate in Southeast Asia.

User Complaints and Platform Integrity

Users have reported significant issues with IQ Option’s platform integrity. Some traders have accused the company of manipulating trading graphs to turn profitable trades into losses. For instance, a user practicing on a demo account reported consistent profits, but upon switching to a real account, experienced losses that seemed orchestrated by the platform. Additionally, there have been reports of delayed or blocked withdrawals, with customer support being unresponsive to user complaints.

Reputational Impact and Potential Motivations for Content Removal

The accumulation of regulatory fines, legal challenges, and user complaints has significantly tarnished IQ Option’s reputation. Allegations of fraudulent practices and regulatory non-compliance can erode public trust, deter potential clients, and attract further regulatory scrutiny. In an effort to protect its reputation and maintain its client base, IQ Option might be motivated to seek the removal of these unfavorable stories. While the company would ideally pursue legal and ethical avenues for content removal, the persistence of adverse news could, in a hypothetical scenario, tempt an entity to consider illicit methods, such as cybercrime, to suppress negative coverage.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44122876
  • Aug 27, 2024
  • NovaFusion Dynamics
  • https://iqoption.com/en
  • https://www.earnforex.com/forex-brokers/IQOption/

Evidence Box

We are investigating IQ Option for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.

Targeted Content and Red Flags

earnforex.com

IQ Option LLC

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

youtube

Is IQ Option a SCAM? - 2024 UPDATE!

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

forexpeacearmy.com

Q Options is a SCAM!!!

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database

Escalate This Case

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert