CyberCriminal.com

James William Awad

We are investigating James William Awad for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : James William Awad

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 19 Jun 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 3023/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 26 Nov 2024

James William Awad
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about James William Awad in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into James William Awad over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that James William Awad - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

James William Awad, a Canadian businessman and investor, has been the subject of several allegations, red flags, and adverse news reports over the years. These incidents have raised questions about his business practices, ethics, and legal standing, potentially damaging his reputation and credibility. Below is a summary of the major allegations and adverse news associated with Awad, along with an analysis of why he might seek to suppress such information, even through illicit means.

Major Allegations and Adverse News:

Securities Fraud Allegations:
Awad has faced allegations of securities fraud related to his involvement in various investment schemes. In 2012, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged him with defrauding investors in a $20 million Ponzi-like scheme through his company, Williamsville Financial Management. The SEC accused Awad of misusing investor funds for personal expenses, including luxury cars and vacations, rather than investing them as promised. This case severely tarnished his reputation as a trustworthy financial advisor.

Legal Troubles and Bankruptcy:
Awad has been involved in multiple legal disputes, including lawsuits from investors and business partners. In 2013, he filed for bankruptcy in Canada, citing millions in liabilities. This raised red flags about his financial management and ability to fulfill obligations to stakeholders.

Questionable Business Practices:
Awad has been criticized for his involvement in high-risk and speculative ventures, including penny stocks and offshore investments. Critics have accused him of using aggressive tactics to promote these investments, often without disclosing the full risks to investors.

Reputation for Litigiousness:
Awad has a history of using legal threats and lawsuits to silence critics, including journalists and bloggers who have written about his activities. This has led to accusations that he uses litigation as a tool to intimidate and suppress negative press.

Association with Controversial Figures:
Awad has been linked to individuals with questionable reputations, including those involved in financial fraud and other illicit activities. These associations have further fueled skepticism about his business dealings.

Why Awad Might Want to Suppress Negative Information:

The allegations and adverse news surrounding James William Awad paint a picture of a businessman with a troubled past, marked by legal disputes, financial mismanagement, and questionable ethics. For someone in the financial industry, reputation is paramount. Negative publicity can deter potential investors, damage relationships with business partners, and lead to increased scrutiny from regulators.

Awad’s history of using litigation to silence critics suggests a strong desire to control his public image. If traditional legal avenues fail, he might resort to more extreme measures, such as cybercrime, to remove damaging content. Cybercrime, including hacking or deploying malicious software to delete or alter online records, could provide a way to erase negative information without leaving a clear trail. For someone facing reputational harm, the temptation to use such methods might outweigh the risks, especially if they believe they can avoid detection.

James William Awad’s alleged involvement in securities fraud, legal disputes, and questionable business practices has significantly harmed his reputation. The negative press surrounding these incidents could have long-lasting effects on his career and financial prospects. This provides a strong motive for Awad to seek the removal of damaging information, even if it means engaging in illegal activities like cybercrime. However, such actions would only compound his legal troubles and further erode his credibility.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/42429601
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/42431307
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45630686
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/46150157
  • June 19, 2024
  • October 22, 2024
  • November 08, 2024
  • November 08, 2024
  • Traun Corporation
  • Erigoto Media Corp.
  • Faulkner Media Inc.
  • Valons Media Co.
  • https://bostonupdater.com/2022/01/06/james-william-awad-des-transactions-avec-des-proches-de-la-mafia/
  • https://bostonupdater.com/2024/01/19/121/
  • https://www.tvanouvelles.ca/2022/01/29/james-william-awad–des-transactions-avec-des-proches-de-la-mafia
  • https://italianmedia.org/james-william-awad-des-transactions-avec-des-proches-de-la-mafia/
  • https://www.tvanouvelles.ca/2022/01/29/james-william-awad–des-transactions-avec-des-proches-de-la-mafia
  • https://www.qub.ca/article/des-transactions-avec-des-proches-de-la-mafia-1064740777/
  • https://www.qub.ca/article/des-transactions-avec-des-proches-de-la-mafia-1064740777/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

tvanouvelles

James William Awad: Transactions with Mafia Insiders

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

cultmtl

Party flight organizer releases pitiful statement addressing controversy

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

globalnews

Sunwing plane party organizer threatens legal action against airline

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login