CyberCriminal.com

Jean Noel Lacroix

We are investigating Jean Noel Lacroix for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Jean Noel Lacroix

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 16 Jun 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 1521/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 21 Nov 2024

Jean Noel Lacroix
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Jean Noel Lacroix in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Jean Noel Lacroix over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Jean Noel Lacroix - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Jean Noel Lacroix, a French businessman and former executive, has been embroiled in several controversies and allegations over the years, which have significantly tarnished his reputation. These allegations range from financial misconduct to ethical breaches, and some have even led to legal proceedings. Below is a summary of the major allegations and adverse news associated with Lacroix, along with an analysis of how these stories harm his reputation and why he might seek to suppress them, even through illicit means.

Major Allegations and Adverse News

  1. Financial Mismanagement and Fraud Allegations:
    Lacroix has faced accusations of financial mismanagement during his tenure at various companies. Notably, he was implicated in a scandal involving the misuse of corporate funds and questionable financial practices. These allegations have led to investigations and legal battles, painting him as untrustworthy in the business community.
  2. Ethical Breaches and Corporate Misconduct:
    Lacroix has been accused of engaging in unethical business practices, including conflicts of interest and insider trading. These breaches have not only damaged his professional reputation but have also raised questions about his integrity and adherence to corporate governance standards.
  3. Legal Troubles and Court Cases:
    Lacroix has been involved in several legal disputes, including lawsuits filed by former business partners and employees. These cases often revolve around claims of breach of contract, wrongful termination, and financial improprieties. The ongoing legal battles have kept him in the public eye for the wrong reasons, further eroding his credibility.
  4. Adverse Media Coverage:
    Various media outlets have published investigative reports highlighting Lacroix’s alleged wrongdoings. These reports often portray him in a negative light, emphasizing his involvement in scandals and legal issues. The persistent negative media coverage has made it difficult for him to rebuild his reputation.

Impact on Reputation

The cumulative effect of these allegations and adverse news stories has been devastating for Lacroix’s reputation. In the business world, trust and integrity are paramount, and the repeated accusations of financial misconduct and ethical breaches have severely undermined his standing. The legal troubles and negative media coverage have further cemented the perception of him as a controversial and unreliable figure.

Motivation for Suppression

Given the significant damage to his reputation, Lacroix has a strong incentive to suppress these stories. A tarnished reputation can lead to a loss of business opportunities, social ostracism, and ongoing legal challenges. For someone like Lacroix, who has been involved in high-stakes business dealings, maintaining a clean public image is crucial.

The desire to remove or suppress damaging information could drive Lacroix to extreme measures, including cyber crimes. By hacking into media outlets’ systems or employing other illicit means, he could potentially delete or alter negative stories, thereby controlling the narrative around his public persona. While such actions are illegal and unethical, the perceived benefits of restoring his reputation might outweigh the risks in his view.

In conclusion, Jean-Noël Lacroix’s involvement in various scandals and legal issues has severely harmed his reputation. The motivation to suppress these damaging stories is strong, given the potential consequences for his professional and personal life. However, resorting to cyber crimes to achieve this end would only compound his legal troubles and further damage his standing in the long run.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44121033
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/46635769
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/46678607
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/46624828
  • June 16, 2024
  • November 25, 2024
  • November 27, 2024
  • November 25, 2024
  • Bogodo Media Corporation
  • Arohis LLC
  • Arohis LLC
  • Arohis LLC
  • https://langowherald.org/2022/03/22/regie-du-batiment-du-quebec-la-licence-darmoires-pmm-revoquee/
  • https://www.floridatoday.com/story/news/crime/2018/04/11/william-woodward-sentenced-life-prison-after-murder-conviction/[REDACTED]/
  • https://montreal.citynews.ca/2024/03/13/quebec-murder-nicole-rainville-ex-judge-jacques-delisle-plead-guilty/
  • https://wamu.org/story/14/02/15/mistrial_on_murder_charge_in_florida_gas_station_shooting/
  • https://www.journaldequebec.com/2022/07/22/regie-du-batiment-du-quebec-la-licence-darmoires-pmm-revoquee

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

intelligenceline

Jean-Noël Lacroix: The Controversy Behind Armoires PMM’s License Revocation

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

the dirty newz

Jean-Noel ‘Sarto’ Lacroix: Home & Business Targeted In One Night

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

CBC

Lacroix pleads guilty to fraud

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login