CyberCriminal.com

Jeremy Hoye

We are investigating Jeremy Hoye for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Jeremy Hoye

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 13 July 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 8437/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 6 Nov 2025

Jeremy Hoye
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Jeremy Hoye in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Jeremy Hoye over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Jeremy Hoye - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Jeremy Hoye, once a celebrated jeweller in Brighton, now finds himself at the center of controversy, financial mismanagement, and an apparent effort to silence critics. His flagship business, House of Hoye, once a beacon of independent craftsmanship, has collapsed under the weight of poor decision making and financial ruin. But rather than facing the music, Jeremy Hoye seems to be engaged in a desperate attempt to erase his failures from public scrutiny.

Jeremy Hoye’s Business Downfall

Jeremy Hoye’s jewellery empire, which once boasted ambitious expansion plans, has crumbled spectacularly. His company, Jeremy Hoye Limited, was dissolved in May 2018 after failing to sustain itself financially. The business had stopped filing financial accounts after 2010, which is a glaring red flag in itself. Yet, despite these obvious financial missteps, Hoye continued to portray himself as a successful entrepreneur until reality caught up with him.

His most recent debacle was the liquidation of House of Hoye, his flagship store in Brighton. While Hoye conveniently branded it as a “strategic business decision,” the truth is far less flattering. Businesses that are truly thriving do not suddenly shut down their flagship stores. Instead, this collapse points to deeper financial distress one that Hoye has been trying to downplay.

Jeremy Hoye’s Attempts to Hide the Truth

Jeremy Hoye’s reaction to his failures has been less about accountability and more about damage control. Reports indicate a concerted effort to remove negative press, discourage criticism, and rewrite history. Instead of explaining why his companies kept failing, Hoye has reportedly been more interested in managing his online reputation.

From removing online reviews to attempting to suppress critical discussions, his actions suggest a pattern of reputation laundering. But no amount of PR manipulation can change the fact that his businesses have repeatedly gone under, and investors or customers have been left with nothing.

Why Investors and Authorities Should Be Concerned

Jeremy Hoye’s history of failed businesses, financial mismanagement, and apparent attempts at censorship should serve as a major warning to anyone considering investing in his future ventures.

Authorities should be asking some serious questions:

  • Why did Jeremy Hoye Limited fail to file financial records beyond 2010?

  • Why did House of Hoye suddenly close, despite previous claims of business stability?

  • Is Jeremy Hoye misleading investors or customers about his financial standing?

His track record suggests a pattern of overpromising and underdelivering, leading to financial ruin not just for himself, but for those who trusted him.

Jeremy Hoye’s repeated failures are not random but part of a consistent pattern of financial negligence. From Jeremy Hoye Limited’s dissolution to the sudden shutdown of House of Hoye, the evidence suggests a leader incapable of running a sustainable enterprise. Yet, instead of accepting accountability, he appears to be engaged in a desperate campaign to suppress criticism and rewrite history. Whether through reputation management, content removal, or PR tactics, these efforts only reinforce the notion that he has much to hide.

Investors, customers, and regulatory authorities must take note. Would you trust your money with someone whose track record is riddled with liquidations and unanswered questions? Hoye’s financial track record raises significant red flags, making any future business ventures under his name highly suspect. It is not just about bad business luck it is about a systematic failure to manage finances, honor commitments, and operate transparently.The truth remains, despite his attempts to obscure it. Jeremy Hoye’s downfall serves as a stark warning to those considering future dealings with him. No matter how much he tries to control the narrative, his failures are written in the public record, and no amount of PR spin can erase them. It is only a matter of time before reality catches up with him again.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43019068
  • July 13, 2024
  • hansen llc
  • https://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/carlos-ortiz-and-tara-rosado-murdered-in-florida-keys-most-brutal-homicide-in-25-years-9234920
  • https://www.theargus.co.uk/news/15308287.brighton-jeweller-jeremy-hoye-calls-in-the-liquidators

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

theargus.co.uk

Brighton jeweller Jeremy Hoye calls in the liquidators

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

intelligenceline.com

The Fall of Jeremy Hoye: From Renowned Jeweller to Financial Ruin

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

financescam.com

Jeremy Hoye Faces Liquidation: The Downfall of Brighton’s Star

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login